You’ve probably seen the images of sprawling shantytowns in Lima or Cairo. To most people, those are just scenes of poverty. But to Hernando de Soto economist and thinker, those dusty hillsides represent trillions of dollars in "dead capital." It’s a bold claim. He’s basically argued for decades that the poor aren't actually poor in assets; they’re just poor in legal assets.
The man is a polarizing figure. Bill Clinton called him the world’s greatest living economist. On the flip side, some academics think his ideas are a dangerous oversimplification of how societies actually work. He isn't your typical ivory tower academic who hides behind complex calculus. He’s been on the ground. He’s had his offices bombed by the Shining Path Maoist guerrillas in Peru because his ideas—giving property rights to the poor—were a direct threat to their "revolution of the masses."
The Logic of Dead Capital
Think about your house. If you live in a developed country, you have a piece of paper called a deed. That paper is magic. It lets you get a mortgage, start a business, or guarantee a loan.
Now, imagine you’re a tailor in a favela in Brazil. You built your shop with your own hands. You’ve worked there for twenty years. But you don't "own" the land in the eyes of the government. Because you lack that piece of paper, your shop is dead capital. You can’t use it as collateral. You can't easily sell it to someone else except through informal, risky channels. Hernando de Soto economist insights suggest that the total value of this informal real estate held by the world's poor is over $9 trillion.
That’s a staggering number. It’s more than all the foreign aid given to the developing world in the last half-century.
Why the Law is a Wall
De Soto’s team famously conducted an experiment in Lima to see how hard it was for a regular person to go "legal." They tried to register a small garment workshop with one employee. It took them 289 days of full-time work. They had to navigate eleven different government agencies and pay bribes just to keep the process moving—though they refused to pay the bribes for the study, which is why it took nearly a year.
Most people just give up. They stay in the "extralegal" sector.
This isn't just about laziness or a desire to avoid taxes. It's about survival. When the legal system is a brick wall, people build their own systems. They have informal "judges" and neighborhood agreements. But those agreements only work within a small circle. You can’t trade with someone three cities away if there’s no formal law to back up the contract.
The Mystery of Capital
One of his most famous books, The Mystery of Capital, tries to answer why capitalism works in the West and fails everywhere else. His answer? The West spent the 19th century integrating all its informal property into one unified legal system.
He points to the American West. Most of the early settlers were technically "squatters." They didn't have deeds from the government. But they fought for their land, and eventually, the U.S. government realized it was easier to legalize their presence through things like the Preemption Acts than to kick them off.
The Critics Fire Back
It’s not all praise, though. Honestly, De Soto has some very loud detractors.
Critics like Timothy Mitchell or various experts from the World Bank have pointed out that giving someone a title doesn't magically create a market. If you’re a subsistence farmer and you get a land title, but there are no banks willing to lend to you, or you have no way to get your crops to market, that piece of paper is just... paper.
There's also the "gentrification" risk. Once a slum is legalized, property taxes go up. Developers move in. Sometimes the poorest people end up selling their newly titled land for a quick buck and moving to a new, even more remote shantytown. It's a complicated cycle that a simple title doesn't always fix.
Applying the Theory to the Digital Age
Lately, De Soto has pivoted. He’s looking at blockchain.
If the problem is a corrupt or inefficient government registry, why not put property titles on a decentralized ledger? He’s worked with companies and governments to see if technology can leapfrog the 289-day bureaucracy he found in Lima.
✨ Don't miss: Dow Jones Do Today: Why the Market is Acting So Weird Right Now
He sees the same "informality" happening in the digital world. People create value in data and virtual spaces, but who owns it? How is it formalized? For Hernando de Soto economist principles, the medium changes—from dirt to data—but the underlying logic remains: without formal recognition, value cannot be leveraged.
The Reality of Implementation
In countries like Egypt, the Philippines, and Tanzania, De Soto’s Institute for Liberty and Democracy (ILD) has tried to map the informal economy. They found that in Cairo, for example, something like 90% of people live in "informal" housing.
Think about the massive untapped potential there.
But implementing his ideas is a political nightmare. You have to fight bureaucrats who lose their bribe money. You have to fight elites who don't want the poor to have a seat at the table. And you have to convince the poor that the government isn't just trying to register them so they can be taxed into oblivion.
What Most People Get Wrong
People often mistake De Soto for a typical "neoliberal."
They think he just wants to privatize everything. That’s not quite it. He’s more of a legal historian. He believes the "market" already exists in the slums—it’s vibrant, it’s active, it’s full of entrepreneurs. The problem is that the market is extralegal.
He wants to bring the law to the people, rather than forcing the people to fit into an archaic law.
It’s a subtle difference, but it matters. He’s not saying "import American laws to Peru." He’s saying "look at how Peruvians are actually trading and turn that into the law."
Actionable Insights for Global Business and Policy
If you're looking at the world through the lens of De Soto's theories, your strategy shifts. You stop looking at emerging markets as "charity cases" and start looking at them as untapped balance sheets.
- Look for the "Shadow" Market: If you are expanding a business into a developing nation, ignore the official GDP numbers for a second. Look at the informal trade. That's where the real demand lives.
- Infrastructure over Aid: Funding a road or a digital registry that allows for clear ownership is often more effective than direct cash transfers.
- The Trust Gap: Understand that for someone in an informal economy, the "state" is often an enemy or a predator. Building trust requires more than just a legal contract; it requires understanding the local informal rules that already exist.
- Leverage Technology: Digital identity and blockchain aren't just buzzwords in this context. They are potential tools to bypass the "289-day" bureaucracy.
De Soto’s work reminds us that poverty isn't always a lack of resources. Sometimes, it’s just a lack of a system that allows those resources to talk to each other. Whether you agree with his solutions or not, you can't ignore the $9 trillion question he's put on the table.
To truly grasp the impact of these ideas, you should compare the economic trajectories of countries that have simplified property registration versus those that haven't. The data usually tells a story of "hidden" growth that official statistics miss entirely. Look into the "Doing Business" reports—even with their flaws—to see the direct lineage of De Soto's influence on global policy.
The next step is evaluating how "informal" your own systems are. Even in big corporations, "dead capital" exists in the form of unused patents or unrecorded tribal knowledge. Formalizing that, just as De Soto suggests for land, is often the quickest path to growth.