Most people think they know what a Guy Ritchie movie looks like. You expect fast-talking London gangsters, snappy montages, and maybe a bit of stylized violence. But then The Covenant happened in 2023, and it basically threw the rulebook out the window. It isn’t just another "shoot-em-up" action flick. It’s a gut-wrenching, sweaty, and deeply stressful look at a specific kind of debt that isn't paid in cash, but in blood and loyalty. Honestly, it’s probably the most mature thing Ritchie has ever put on film.
The movie follows US Army Sergeant John Kinley, played with a sort of exhausted intensity by Jake Gyllenhaal, and his Afghan interpreter Ahmed, portrayed by Dar Salim. It’s set during the War in Afghanistan, but it’s less about the geopolitics and more about a singular, grueling debt. When their unit is ambushed, Ahmed carries a wounded Kinley across miles of treacherous, Taliban-controlled terrain. It's brutal. You can almost feel the dehydration through the screen. But the real story starts when Kinley gets home and realizes the US government isn't going to help the man who saved his life.
The Covenant and the Harsh Reality of SIVs
What makes The Covenant feel so heavy is that while the specific characters are fictional, the premise is painfully real. It centers on the Special Immigrant Visa (SIV) program. This was—and is—a real-world mechanism designed to protect locals who worked with US forces. If you were an interpreter, you were a target. Your family was a target. The movie shines a harsh light on the bureaucratic nightmare that left thousands of real-life "Ahmeds" stranded after the US withdrawal.
It’s frustrating to watch. Kinley sits in his comfortable home in America, making phone call after phone call, getting put on hold by nameless bureaucrats while Ahmed is hunted like an animal back in Afghanistan. This isn't just movie drama; it's a reflection of the actual backlog that saw tens of thousands of Afghan allies left in limbo. According to data from the Association of Wartime Allies, the failure to process these visas in a timely manner had life-or-death consequences for thousands. Ritchie doesn't preach about it. He just shows you the toll it takes on a man's soul when he realizes his country's word isn't as good as his own.
Why Jake Gyllenhaal and Dar Salim Work So Well
The chemistry here isn't about witty banter. It's about silence.
📖 Related: Colin Macrae Below Deck: Why the Fan-Favorite Engineer Finally Walked Away
Jake Gyllenhaal is known for going "big" in roles, but here he stays internal. He’s playing a man who is literally haunted by his own survival. On the flip side, Dar Salim is the heart of the movie. Ahmed isn't a sidekick. He’s a father, a former drug smuggler looking for redemption, and a man with more tactical awareness than half the soldiers he’s working with. When he decides to drag Kinley’s limp body across the mountains, he knows exactly what it’s going to cost him.
It’s a masterclass in physical acting. There is a sequence where Ahmed has to pull a cart carrying Kinley up a steep, crumbling incline. It’s long. It’s painful. You see every muscle straining. It’s not "cool" action; it’s desperate survival. This is where the movie earns its title. A covenant isn't just a contract. It's a solemn promise. A bond that can't be broken without losing your humanity.
Breaking Down the "Guy Ritchie" Style
If you came for the Snatch or Sherlock Holmes energy, you’ll be surprised. The camera work is more grounded. There are fewer "trick" shots. However, Ritchie's DNA is still there in the pacing. The tension builds like a pressure cooker. He uses sound design—the buzzing of flies, the distant hum of a drone, the crunch of gravel—to make the Afghan wilderness feel like a character that wants to kill you.
- The first act is a procedural. It’s about how these teams actually worked.
- The second act is a survival horror movie.
- The third act is a mission of personal redemption.
This structure keeps you off balance. Just when you think you’re watching a standard military thriller, it shifts into something much more intimate and desperate. The "heroics" here aren't about winning a war; the war is already lost. The heroics are about saving one person because it's the right thing to do.
👉 See also: Cómo salvar a tu favorito: La verdad sobre la votación de La Casa de los Famosos Colombia
The True Cost of the Interpreters’ Sacrifice
We have to talk about the real-world context because The Covenant demands it. Between 2001 and 2021, an estimated 50,000 Afghan interpreters worked with the US military. When the Taliban took over in August 2021, many of these individuals were left behind despite promises of relocation.
The movie ends with a series of photos of real soldiers and their interpreters. It’s a somber reminder that for every John Kinley who went back to get his friend, there are hundreds of stories that didn't end with a Hollywood rescue. This is where the film's "E-E-A-T" (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) shines. It doesn't pretend there's a happy ending for everyone. It acknowledges the messiness.
Critics like Matt Zoller Seitz have pointed out that while the film functions as a "rescue fantasy," it’s grounded in a very real anger about how veterans feel when their promises are ignored by the state. It taps into a specific kind of veteran experience: the feeling of being abandoned by the very system you served.
Why This Movie Didn't Explode at the Box Office
It’s a bit of a mystery why The Covenant didn't become a massive cultural phenomenon. It was released in a crowded window, and maybe the title—Guy Ritchie’s The Covenant—felt a bit confusing to audiences used to his comedies. Or perhaps, honestly, people were just tired of thinking about Afghanistan.
✨ Don't miss: Cliff Richard and The Young Ones: The Weirdest Bromance in TV History Explained
But word of mouth has been strong. On platforms like Rotten Tomatoes, the audience score remains significantly higher than many other military dramas of the last decade. People respond to the lack of "rah-rah" jingoism. It’s a movie about a man who is embarrassed by his government and takes matters into his own hands. That resonates across the political spectrum.
The film also avoids the "White Savior" trope by making Ahmed the most competent person in the story for the first hour and a half. Kinley isn't saving a helpless victim; he’s trying to repay a titan who already saved him. That shift in power dynamics makes the eventual rescue feel earned rather than condescending.
Practical Takeaways for Fans of the Genre
If you're looking for more than just a Friday night watch, there are ways to engage with the themes of The Covenant in the real world. This isn't just a movie; it's a window into a continuing crisis.
- Research the SIV Program: Look into the work of organizations like No One Left Behind. They provide direct support to evacuated interpreters and advocate for those still waiting.
- Watch for Nuance: Pay attention to how the film handles the "enemy." The Taliban aren't faceless monsters; they are portrayed as a persistent, organized, and terrifyingly efficient force, which raises the stakes for the protagonists.
- Explore Dar Salim’s Filmography: If you liked his performance, check out his work in Danish cinema. He brings a level of gravitas that is often missing from supporting roles in American action films.
Final Thoughts on Loyalty
The Covenant is a rare bird. It’s an action movie with a soul. It doesn't give you the easy satisfaction of a "mission accomplished" banner. Instead, it leaves you with the quiet realization that doing the right thing often costs everything you have.
The film stands as a tribute to the bond between soldiers and the locals who risk everything to help them. It’s about the fact that a promise made in a foxhole shouldn't expire when you step onto an airplane. If you haven't seen it, find a big screen and some good speakers. It’s worth the stress.
To truly understand the impact of the film, your next step should be to look into the actual testimonies of Afghan SIV recipients. Their stories of transit and resettlement provide the necessary "part two" to the fictional journey of Ahmed. Reading these first-hand accounts bridges the gap between cinematic drama and the enduring human stakes that inspired Guy Ritchie to step outside his comfort zone.