Let’s be honest. The early 1990s were absolutely obsessed with the "lawyer in peril" trope. You couldn't throw a stone in a cinema without hitting a legal thriller based on a John Grisham novel or a script trying desperately to mimic one. Amidst that sea of suits and mahogany courtrooms, the Guilty as Sin film arrived in 1993, and while it didn't exactly set the world on fire at the box office, it remains a weirdly fascinating relic of its time. It’s got everything: peak Rebecca De Mornay, a wildly hammy Don Johnson, and a plot that feels like it was dreamed up during a feverish binge of film noir.
People often confuse it with Jagged Edge or Body of Evidence. I get why. But this one has a specific, sleazy energy that makes it stand out even decades later. It’s a movie that asks a very simple, terrifying question: What do you do when you realize your client is a monster, but you're legally bound to protect him?
The Setup: Jennifer Haines and the Client from Hell
Rebecca De Mornay plays Jennifer Haines. She’s an ambitious, sharp-as-a-tack defense attorney in Chicago who just won a major case. She’s on top of the world. Then walks in David Greenhill, played by Don Johnson with a smirk that practically screams "I definitely did it." Greenhill is accused of throwing his wealthy wife out of a high-rise window. He doesn't want just any lawyer; he wants Jennifer.
The dynamic is immediately off-kilter.
Usually, in these movies, there’s a "did he or didn't he" mystery that carries us through the second act. Not here. The Guilty as Sin film makes it pretty clear early on that Greenhill is a sociopath. He’s a "lady-killer" in the most literal, gruesome sense of the word. He targets rich women, seduces them, and disposes of them. It’s not a whodunnit. It’s a "how do I get out of this" thriller.
Why Sidney Lumet Was an Odd Choice for This
If you look at the credits, one name jumps out: Sidney Lumet.
Wait. The guy who directed 12 Angry Men? The man behind Dog Day Afternoon and Network? Yes. That Sidney Lumet. It’s easily one of the most commercial, "popcorn" movies in his entire filmography. Lumet was a master of the courtroom, but he usually used it to explore deep ethical quandaries or systemic corruption. In the Guilty as Sin film, he’s basically playing with a slasher movie structure dressed up in a double-breasted suit.
🔗 Read more: Donnalou Stevens Older Ladies: Why This Viral Anthem Still Hits Different
There's a gritty, New York-style realism he usually brings to his work, but here, he leans into the melodrama. The lighting is moodier. The pacing is faster. It’s Lumet having a bit of fun with a script by Larry Cohen—the guy who wrote Phone Booth and directed It's Alive. When you combine a prestige director like Lumet with a B-movie king like Cohen, you get this strange, high-low art hybrid that shouldn't work, yet somehow does.
The Don Johnson Factor
Don Johnson was coming off Miami Vice and trying to pivot into serious film roles. In this movie, he is absolutely swinging for the fences. His David Greenhill is a man who is deeply in love with his own reflection. He’s creepy. He’s charming. He’s genuinely unsettling because he’s so transparently a predator, yet he moves through the world with total impunity.
He stalks Jennifer. He breaks into her apartment. He messes with her personal life. It's a performance that borders on camp, but in the context of a 90s erotic thriller, it fits perfectly. He’s the physical embodiment of Jennifer’s hubris. She thought she could handle anyone. She was wrong.
Breaking Down the Ethical Nightmare
The core of the Guilty as Sin film isn't actually the murder. It’s the attorney-client privilege. This is what really grinds the gears of the audience. We watch Jennifer discover evidence—real, incriminating evidence—that her client has killed before and will kill again. But because of the law, she can’t go to the police. She can’t quit the case without risking her career or her life.
It’s a claustrophobic setup.
- She is trapped by her own profession.
- The villain knows the rules better than she does.
- The justice system is used as a weapon against the person trying to uphold it.
The film leans heavily into the idea that the law isn't about truth; it’s about the game. Greenhill loves the game. He treats the trial like a performance, a way to woo the jury and the public. It’s a cynical view of the American legal system that felt very "of the moment" in the early 90s, especially with real-life trials like O.J. Simpson's just around the corner in 1994.
💡 You might also like: Donna Summer Endless Summer Greatest Hits: What Most People Get Wrong
A Technical Look at the 90s Aesthetic
Visually, the movie is a time capsule. If you love 90s fashion, Jennifer’s wardrobe is a masterclass in power dressing. We’re talking massive shoulder pads, neutral tones, and hair that is perfectly coiffed even when she’s being chased by a murderer. The cinematography by Andrzej Bartkowiak (who later directed Romeo Must Die) gives Chicago a cold, sterile look that mirrors Jennifer’s initial detached professionalism.
The score by Howard Shore is also worth mentioning. Before he was winning Oscars for Lord of the Rings, Shore was the king of the "unsettling thriller" sound. His music here is subtle, building a sense of dread that the script sometimes struggles to maintain. It keeps the stakes feeling high even when the plot twists start getting a little ridiculous.
The Critical Reception: Then vs. Now
When it was released in June 1993, critics weren't exactly kind. Roger Ebert gave it two stars, essentially saying it was a well-made movie that didn't make a lick of sense. He wasn't entirely wrong. The logic in the third act starts to unravel like a cheap sweater.
However, looking back at it now, there’s a craftsmanship to the Guilty as Sin film that we don’t see in modern direct-to-streaming thrillers. It was shot on film. It had a real budget. It had a legendary director. Even if the story is "trashy," it’s prestige trash. That’s a genre we’ve largely lost.
Today, it holds a respectable enough cult following among fans of the genre. It’s frequently cited as one of the better "non-Grisham" legal thrillers. It doesn't try to be a moral lesson; it just tries to be a tense, slightly gross-out ride through the dark side of the law.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Ending
People often complain that the ending of the Guilty as Sin film goes off the rails. They’re right—it absolutely does. It moves from a courtroom drama to a full-blown action-horror climax.
📖 Related: Do You Believe in Love: The Song That Almost Ended Huey Lewis and the News
But that’s the point.
The movie is arguing that you cannot defeat a person like David Greenhill within the confines of the law. The law is a system of rules, and Greenhill doesn't believe rules apply to him. To stop a monster, Jennifer has to step outside the courtroom and meet him on his own turf. It’s a cynical, almost nihilistic conclusion, but it’s consistent with the "Lumet-meets-Cohen" vibe of the whole project.
Actionable Takeaways for Movie Buffs
If you’re planning on revisiting this one or watching it for the first time, here is how to get the most out of the experience:
Watch it as a Double Feature
Pair it with The Hand That Rocks the Cradle (1992). Both films feature Rebecca De Mornay at the height of her "ice queen" era, though she plays the victim/hero in one and the villain in the other. It shows her incredible range during that decade.
Look for the Lumet Touches
Pay attention to the scenes in the judge's chambers or the quiet moments between Jennifer and her mentor, Moe (played by the great Jack Warden). You can see the "real" Sidney Lumet in those beats—the focus on character and the weariness of old men who have seen too much.
Don't Take the Legal Logic Too Seriously
If you are an actual lawyer, you will probably want to scream at the screen. The ethical violations are fast and frequent. Just accept that in this universe, the Chicago Bar Association is apparently on a very long vacation.
Check the Streaming Availability
Because it's a Hollywood Pictures release (a defunct Disney subsidiary), it often hops around various streaming platforms like Tubi or Hulu. It’s also usually available for a few bucks on VOD.
The Guilty as Sin film is a reminder of a specific era of filmmaking where movie stars were enough to carry a mid-budget thriller to the local multiplex. It’s not a masterpiece, but it is a hell of a lot of fun if you’re in the mood for some 90s gloom.
Practical Next Steps
- Verify the Cast: If you’re a fan of Jack Warden, this is one of his late-career gems where he provides the emotional heart of the story.
- Compare the Styles: If you've only seen Lumet's "serious" work like The Verdict, watch this to see how he handles a high-concept thriller.
- Analyze the Gender Dynamics: Consider how the film portrays a powerful woman being targeted by a man who uses his charm as a weapon—a theme that feels even more relevant today than it did in 1993.