The photo is everything. You know the one. Six men, a heavy pole, and the stars and stripes rising over a jagged, hellish landscape of volcanic ash. It is the most reproduced image in the history of photography. It defines the United States Marine Corps. But the story behind James Bradley’s book Flag of Our Fathers, and the subsequent Clint Eastwood film, isn't really about the glory of war. Honestly? It is a story about a massive, accidental lie that nearly destroyed the men who survived it.
War is messy.
Most people think that Joe Rosenthal’s photo captured the moment Iwo Jima was won. It didn't. The "official" flag raising happened on February 23, 1945, just five days into a battle that would last over a month. The men in that photo weren't posing for history; they were just doing what they were told after a previous, smaller flag had been taken down to be kept as a souvenir by a high-ranking officer.
The Truth Behind the Iwo Jima Identity Crisis
When James Bradley wrote Flag of Our Fathers, he believed his father, John "Doc" Bradley, was one of those six men. For decades, the world believed it. The government sold war bonds using their faces. But history has a funny way of correcting itself when we look closer at the grain of a film negative.
In 2016, the Marine Corps officially announced that Doc Bradley wasn't in the photo. He was involved in the first flag raising, but not the iconic second one. The man actually in the shot was Harold Schultz. Later, in 2019, another correction identified Cesar Bazan in place of Rene Gagnon. These aren't just trivia points. They represent a fundamental fracture in how we process the "hero" narrative. Imagine living your whole life being praised for a moment you weren't actually part of, or worse, being the guy who was there and watching someone else take the credit for seventy years while you lived a quiet life in Detroit.
Schultz never corrected the record. He just lived his life.
📖 Related: Despicable Me 2 Edith: Why the Middle Child is Secretly the Best Part of the Movie
Why the Narrative of Flag of Our Fathers Is So Uncomfortable
Clint Eastwood’s film adaptation captures something the history books usually gloss over: the predatory nature of celebrity.
The three surviving "flag raisers"—at least as they were identified at the time—were whisked away from the meat grinder of the Pacific and paraded around American stadiums. They were treated like rock stars to squeeze money out of a war-weary public. It was a PR campaign. Rene Gagnon, Ira Hayes, and Doc Bradley (who we now know was misidentified but still lived through the trauma) were forced to play-act their "heroism" on papier-mâché mountains in the middle of Chicago and New York.
It was soul-crushing.
Ira Hayes, a Pima Native American, had a particularly brutal time. He was a "hero" on the poster but a "Chief" or an "Indian" to the people buying the bonds. He couldn't get a drink in many bars back home, yet he was expected to stand at attention for the cameras. He eventually spiraled into alcoholism and died in a ditch, literally. It's a dark, jagged pill to swallow. Flag of Our Fathers doesn't shy away from this. It suggests that the "Greatest Generation" was often exploited by the very country they were bleeding for.
The Physicality of Iwo Jima
You have to understand the geography to get why this matters. Iwo Jima is a cinder. It’s a sulfuric, stinking rock. The Japanese weren't on the beach; they were inside the mountain.
👉 See also: Death Wish II: Why This Sleazy Sequel Still Triggers People Today
- 27,000 American casualties.
- Nearly 19,000 Japanese soldiers killed.
- A landscape of black sand that made running impossible.
When those men climbed Mount Suribachi, they weren't thinking about iconography. They were thinking about not getting shot by a sniper from a hidden pillbox. The movie captures this chaos by washing out the color. It looks like a graveyard before the bodies are even buried.
The Controversy of Two Perspectives: Flags vs. Letters
You can't really talk about Flag of Our Fathers without mentioning its companion piece, Letters from Iwo Jima. Eastwood did something remarkably bold: he filmed the same battle from the Japanese perspective.
It’s easy to paint the "enemy" as a faceless horde. But when you see General Kuribayashi—played brilliantly by Ken Watanabe—writing letters to his family while knowing he is going to die on that island, the "heroism" of the flag-raising becomes even more complex. It stops being a story of Good vs. Evil and starts being a story of boys dying for the pride of old men in distant capitals.
Some veterans hated this. They felt it humanized the people who had killed their friends. Others found it deeply cathartic because it acknowledged that the "enemy" felt the same terror they did.
The Misidentification Scandal and Modern Forensics
The way we found out about the misidentifications in Flag of Our Fathers is actually pretty cool. It wasn't some secret diary. It was amateur historians—specifically Eric Krelle and Stephen Spence—using digital forensics.
✨ Don't miss: Dark Reign Fantastic Four: Why This Weirdly Political Comic Still Holds Up
They looked at the gear.
They noticed that the man identified as Doc Bradley was wearing a different style of belt and cuffed trousers that didn't match what Bradley was wearing earlier that day. They tracked the equipment. They looked at the shadows. It took the Marine Corps years to admit they were wrong. It changes the book’s emotional core, sure, but it actually reinforces the book’s primary theme: the fog of war is permanent.
Doc Bradley’s son, James, had to grapple with the fact that his father—the man he wrote an entire bestseller about—wasn't in the most famous photo in the world. But here’s the thing: Doc Bradley was a hero. He was a navy medic who earned a Navy Cross for braving heavy fire to save a fellow sailor. He just wasn't in that photo.
Actionable Insights for History Buffs and Film Fans
If you're looking to dive deeper into this specific moment in history, don't just stop at the movie. The nuances are in the margins.
- Watch the "Iwo Jima: Uncovering the Hour" documentaries. These go into the granular detail of the photographic evidence that changed the identities of the flag-raisers. It’s a fascinating look at how digital sleuthing can rewrite history.
- Read "Letters from Iwo Jima" alongside the book. It provides the necessary friction. To understand the flag, you have to understand the people who were trying to keep it from being raised.
- Visit the National Museum of the Marine Corps in Quantico. They have the actual flags (both of them). Seeing the physical fabric—the first small one and the second large one—puts the scale of the "souvenir" controversy into perspective.
- Look for the "Third" Perspective. Check out the work of Robert Sherrod, a journalist who was actually on the beaches. His dispatches provide a raw, uncensored look at the carnage that a sanitized PR tour could never replicate.
History isn't a static thing. It's a living, breathing, and often corrected record. Flag of Our Fathers remains essential because it teaches us that the symbol is often more powerful than the reality, and that the men behind the symbol are usually much more interesting—and much more broken—than the legends suggest.
The real legacy of the photo isn't the victory. It's the weight those six men had to carry for the rest of their lives, whether they were actually in the frame or not. You've got to respect the man, not just the image. Honestly, that's the only way to honor what actually happened on that sulfurous rock in 1945.