You’ve probably seen the meme. Or maybe you heard a pundit use it to describe the latest political circus. It’s one of those phrases that sounds incredibly smart at a cocktail party, but most people actually butcher where it came from. The idea that history repeats itself first as tragedy, then as farce isn't just a witty line; it’s a scathing critique of how humans—especially those in power—tend to repeat their biggest mistakes with increasingly ridiculous results.
Honestly, it’s everywhere.
When Karl Marx wrote this in his 1852 essay The Eighteenth Brumaire of Louis Napoleon, he wasn't trying to be a philosopher of "cycles." He was actually just really, really annoyed. He was watching the French Revolution of 1848 fall apart. Instead of the grand, world-changing heroism of the original French Revolution, he saw a mediocre nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte—Louis-Napoleon—seizing power. To Marx, the first Napoleon was a world-historical tragedy. The second one? He was just a guy in a cheap suit trying to relive the glory days.
It was a parody. A joke. A farce.
The Origin Story Marx Never Expected to Go Viral
Most people think history is a straight line. It’s not. It’s more like a spiral that keeps hitting the same bumps, but the bumps get weirder every time. Marx opened his essay by nodding to Hegel, who had previously noted that great world-historic facts and personages appear, so to speak, twice. Marx added the famous kicker: "the first time as tragedy, the second time as farce."
He was looking at the 1789 Revolution. That was the tragedy. Thousands died, a king lost his head, and the world fundamentally shifted. It was horrific, but it was significant. Fast forward to 1851, and you have Louis-Napoleon (Napoleon III) performing a coup d'état. Marx viewed Louis-Napoleon as a "grotesque mediocrity" who managed to play the part of a hero only because the political stage was so empty.
The distinction is crucial. Tragedy implies a certain level of dignity or at least immense stakes. Farce implies that the actors are playing a role they don't quite fit. They are wearing their ancestors' clothes, and the sleeves are way too long.
Why We Keep Seeing This Pattern in Politics
Look at the 20th century. You can see the first as tragedy then as farce dynamic play out in almost every major geopolitical shift.
✨ Don't miss: Melissa Calhoun Satellite High Teacher Dismissal: What Really Happened
Take the Cold War. The initial struggle between the US and the USSR was a high-stakes tragedy. We're talking about the Cuban Missile Crisis, the literal brink of nuclear annihilation, and deeply held (if flawed) ideological convictions. It was terrifying. It was "real."
Contrast that with some of the "New Cold War" rhetoric we see today. You have politicians on Twitter using the same apocalyptic language to describe trade disputes or social media bots. The stakes are still there, sure, but the delivery feels performative. It’s a simulation of a struggle. It’s people using the vocabulary of the 1950s to solve 2026 problems.
It feels like a reboot of a classic movie where they replaced the lead actors with TikTok influencers.
The Economic Version: Bubbles and Blunders
The phrase works just as well for money as it does for monarchs.
- The Tragedy: The Great Depression of 1929. Families lost everything. People lived in shantytowns. It led to a global shift in how governments managed economies. It was a structural collapse of the highest order.
- The Farce: The 2021 memestock and NFT craze. While people did lose money, the "collapse" involved cartoon monkeys and people YOLO-ing their rent money into Dogecoin because a billionaire tweeted a rocket emoji.
In both cases, you have a financial bubble. In both cases, the bubble pops. But while the first was a somber lesson in the fragility of global markets, the second felt like a chaotic episode of a reality show that stayed on the air two seasons too long.
Does History Actually Repeat Itself?
Historians will tell you "no." Not exactly.
The context always changes. But the human ego? That stays the same. People love to cast themselves as the protagonist of a grand historical narrative. This is where the farce creeps in. When a modern leader tries to evoke the imagery of a "Great Founder" or a "Revolutionary Hero," they are inevitably compared to the original.
🔗 Read more: Wisconsin Judicial Elections 2025: Why This Race Broke Every Record
And the original is almost always more impressive.
This creates a "disconnect." We see the gap between the monumental importance of the past and the slight absurdity of the present. That gap is where the farce lives. It’s the feeling that we are watching a tribute act instead of the real deal.
Recognizing the Farce in Your Own Life
It’s not just for world leaders. We do this to ourselves.
Think about your first big breakup. It was a tragedy. You stayed in bed for a week, listened to the same sad album 400 times, and felt like your world was ending. It was raw. It was foundational.
Your fourth breakup? You’re probably just annoyed. You’re going through the same motions—the "we need to talk" text, the deleting of the photos—but you know the script by heart. You might even catch yourself performing the "sadness" because that’s what you’re supposed to do. You’re parodying your younger self.
That’s the farce.
Actionable Insights: How to Break the Cycle
If you feel like you’re living in a "farce" era, you’re not stuck there. Understanding the first as tragedy then as farce concept is actually a superpower for pattern recognition.
💡 You might also like: Casey Ramirez: The Small Town Benefactor Who Smuggled 400 Pounds of Cocaine
1. Spot the Performance.
When you see a public figure or even a boss using grand, dramatic language ("This is a revolution!"), ask yourself: is this actually a tragedy-level event, or are they just wearing a costume? Recognizing the performance helps you stay grounded and avoid getting swept up in manufactured drama.
2. Audit Your Own History.
Look at the mistakes you keep repeating. Are you doing the same thing but expecting a different result? If you’re on the third iteration of the same bad habit, you’re in the farce stage. Awareness is the only way to stop the loop.
3. Value the "Boring" over the "Dramatic."
Farce thrives on spectacle. Real progress is usually quiet and a bit tedious. If something feels too "cinematic" or "historical," be skeptical. Usually, the most effective solutions to big problems don't look like a scene from a movie; they look like a spreadsheet.
4. Study the Tragedy to Avoid the Farce.
Don't just read the headlines about what's happening now. Go back and look at the original version. If you understand the mechanics of the 1920s, the 2020s become much easier to navigate. You’ll see the "recycled" ideas before they can trick you.
History doesn't have to be a recurring joke. We only end up in a farce when we refuse to learn the lessons of the tragedy that came before it. By spotting the tropes and calling out the performative nonsense, you can step out of the script and start writing something actually new.
Stop playing the role someone else wrote a century ago.
Start looking for the reality beneath the costumes.
The next time you see a "world-changing" event that feels a little too familiar, remember Marx. He wasn't just being cynical; he was giving us a tool to see through the smoke and mirrors of people who think they’re making history when they’re really just making a scene.