Food and grief. They're a weird pairing, right? But back in 2016, AMC thought they had found the secret sauce with their crime drama Feed the Beast. It had David Schwimmer fresh off his post-Friends career resurgence and Jim Sturgess playing a visionary chef with a serious coke habit. On paper, it was the "next Breaking Bad" with spatulas instead of meth labs.
It didn't work.
If you’ve ever binged the ten episodes that make up the first and only season, you know exactly why it’s such a frustrating watch. It’s a show about a sommelier and a chef trying to open a high-end Greek restaurant in the Bronx, but it’s also about the mob, corrupt officials, and a silent child. It tried to do everything. It ended up doing a lot of things just okay.
What Feed the Beast Was Actually Trying to Be
The show was based on a Danish series called Bankerot. In the American version, we meet Tommy Moran (Schwimmer) and Dion Patras (Sturgess). Tommy is a broken man. His wife died in a hit-and-run, he’s raising a son who stopped speaking because of the trauma, and he’s basically drinking his way through his days as a wine salesman. Dion is the "bad boy" archetype. He just got out of prison and owes a massive debt to a mobster known as The Tooth Fairy.
The central hook of Feed the Beast is their dream: Thirio. It’s a restaurant that’s supposed to save them both.
The pilot starts with a lot of energy. You see the grit of the Bronx mixed with the sterile, beautiful aesthetic of high-end plating. It’s "food porn" with a dark underbelly. When the show focuses on the logistics of the kitchen—the pressure of a soft opening, the nuances of a vintage wine, the sheer ego required to run a line—it’s actually pretty great. But it never stays there for long.
The Schwimmer Factor
Honestly, David Schwimmer is better here than people give him credit for. We all see Ross Geller when we look at him, but in this show, he leans into a deep, pathetic sadness that feels authentic. He’s not "funny sad"; he’s "haven't-washed-my-hair-in-four-days" sad.
📖 Related: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
Jim Sturgess, meanwhile, plays Dion with a frantic, twitchy energy. He’s the catalyst. He’s the one who manipulates Tommy into opening the restaurant because he needs a way to funnel money to the mob. It’s a classic "odd couple" dynamic, but with much higher stakes and a lot more illegal substances.
Why the Critics Mauled It
The reviews were brutal. Rotten Tomatoes has it sitting at a dismal 23%. Why? Because the tone was all over the place. One minute you’re watching a sensitive exploration of a father trying to connect with his mute son, and the next, a mobster is literally pulling someone’s teeth out with pliers.
It felt like AMC was trying to force a "prestige drama" template onto a story that didn't need it. The "Tooth Fairy" character, played by Michael Gladis, felt like a cartoon villain compared to the grounded, depressing reality of Tommy’s life. It was jarring. People wanted The Bear (even though it didn't exist yet), but they got a soap opera with a high production budget.
The Problem With Genre Blending
Mixing crime and cooking isn't new, but Feed the Beast struggled to find the balance.
- The mob stuff felt derivative.
- The family drama felt heavy-handed.
- The culinary side was the most interesting part but got pushed to the background.
When you look at successful shows in this niche, they usually pick a lane. If it's a crime show, the "job" is the backdrop. If it's a workplace show, the "drama" comes from the work. This show tried to make them equal, and the gears just ground against each other.
The Bronx Setting and Visual Style
Give credit where it's due: the show looked expensive. The cinematography by Mott Hupfel made the Bronx look moody and atmospheric. The contrast between the dusty, neglected streets and the gleaming copper pots of the kitchen provided a visual metaphor for the characters' aspirations.
👉 See also: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
They shot a lot of it on location, and you can feel that. It wasn't just a backlot in California. The gray skies and the industrial textures added a layer of realism that the script sometimes lacked. It’s a shame the writing couldn't always match the visual ambition.
Why It Only Lasted One Season
AMC officially canceled Feed the Beast in September 2016. The ratings just weren't there. It premiered to about one million viewers and dropped steadily from there. By the finale, it had lost nearly half its audience.
In a world where Better Call Saul and The Walking Dead were the standard-bearers for the network, a niche drama about a failing restaurant didn't have the legs to survive a slow start. The cliffhanger ending—which I won't spoil here just in case you're a masochist who wants to watch it—never got resolved. It remains one of those "what if" shows that sits in the back of the Netflix or Hulu library, waiting for someone to rediscover it.
Could It Have Been Saved?
Probably. If the showrunners had leaned more into the "restaurant as a character" aspect, it might have found a cult following. There is a specific kind of tension in the service industry that is naturally cinematic. The ticking clock, the demanding customers, the hierarchy of the kitchen—that’s where the drama lives. The mob stuff felt like a distraction.
Imagine a version of Feed the Beast that focused entirely on the struggle of two broken men trying to survive the brutal economy of New York dining. That’s a show people would still be talking about today. Instead, it’s a footnote.
Finding the Bright Spots
It’s not all bad. Really. If you’re a fan of culinary TV, the scenes involving Dion’s cooking are legitimately impressive. They hired real consultants to make sure the techniques looked right. You won't see any "Henson-style" fake chopping here.
✨ Don't miss: Ashley My 600 Pound Life Now: What Really Happened to the Show’s Most Memorable Ashleys
And for those who like dark, brooding dramas, the chemistry between Schwimmer and Sturgess is actually quite strong. They feel like old friends who have drifted apart and been forced back together by tragedy. There’s a history there that doesn't need to be explained in dialogue; you can see it in how they occupy the same space.
Key Takeaways for Viewers
If you decide to jump into this one-season wonder, go in with managed expectations.
- Don't expect a resolution. The story ends on a massive "to be continued" that never happened.
- Watch for the acting. Schwimmer is doing career-best dramatic work here.
- Enjoy the food. It’s some of the best-looking food ever put on a non-reality TV show.
Where to Watch and What to Do Next
As of now, you can usually find the show on various streaming platforms or for purchase on Amazon and Apple. It’s a quick ten-episode commitment.
If you've already seen it and you're looking for that same "high-pressure kitchen" vibe without the unnecessary mobsters, your next move is definitely The Bear on FX/Hulu. It basically took the DNA of what Feed the Beast was trying to do and perfected it. Alternatively, check out the original Danish series Bankerot if you can find it with subtitles; it has a bit more of the dark humor that the American version lacked.
For those interested in the real-world Bronx food scene that inspired the setting, look into the revitalization of the Arthur Avenue area. The show tapped into a real cultural shift in the borough that continues to this day.
Ultimately, Feed the Beast is a fascinating failure. It’s a reminder that even with a great cast and a big budget, you can’t force a show to have a soul. It has to find its own voice, and this one just happened to be shouting too many things at once.