It was the early 2000s. Red carpets were chaotic, low-rise jeans were everywhere, and two of the biggest stars on the planet were wearing each other's DNA around their necks.
Honestly, it's the kind of thing that wouldn't even fly today. Can you imagine a modern A-lister showing up to a premiere at the El Capitan Theatre and telling a reporter they’re carrying a vial of their spouse's blood? Twitter would melt. But back then, the Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie blood jewelry wasn't just a weird fashion choice; it became the defining image of a relationship that the media simply couldn't look away from. People still talk about it like it was some dark, gothic ritual.
The reality? It was a lot more "DIY craft project" than "occult ceremony."
The Truth Behind the Vials
Let's get one thing straight: they weren't walking around with pint-sized mason jars of type O-negative.
According to Billy Bob Thornton himself—who has spent the last two decades explaining this to anyone who will listen—the "vials" were actually tiny lockets. Think the size of a fingernail. He’s often joked that the press made it sound like they were wearing quart jars. In reality, they were just silver lockets that you'd buy at a hobby shop or a high-end jewelry store, intended for a photo or a lock of hair.
Jolie, who has always had a bit of an edgy, macabre streak, thought it would be a romantic gesture. They were spending a lot of time apart. He was off filming Sling Blade or A Simple Plan (actually, the timing was closer to Monster's Ball), and she was busy with Lara Croft: Tomb Raider. Being long-distance is hard. They wanted something to keep them connected.
So, they pricked their fingers with a pen.
That’s it. A couple of drops smeared on the inside of a locket. By the time the world saw them on the red carpet, the blood had probably already dried and turned a dark, brownish color. It wasn't some glowing, vibrant liquid. It was just... biological material in a necklace.
👉 See also: Mara Wilson and Ben Shapiro: The Family Feud Most People Get Wrong
Why the Media Went Nuclear
You have to remember the context of 2000. Angelina Jolie was the "wild child" of Hollywood. She had just won an Oscar for Girl, Interrupted, she was estranged from her father Jon Voight, and she had a reputation for being dangerously cool. Billy Bob was the eccentric, brilliant Southern auteur who was twenty years her senior.
When they got married in Las Vegas after a whirlwind two-month romance—while Billy Bob was allegedly still in a relationship with Laura Dern—the tabloids smelled blood. Literally.
The Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie blood necklaces became the perfect metaphor for their "vampiric" love. It fed into every stereotype the public had about them. They were seen as intense, boundary-pushing, and perhaps a little bit unhinged.
- The public saw: Satanic rituals and weird Hollywood darkness.
- The couple saw: A sweet, slightly punk-rock way to say "I love you."
They were basically the precursors to Machine Gun Kelly and Megan Fox, but without the Instagram filters.
The Logistics of 2000s Romance
It’s easy to look back and cringe. We’ve all done things in our twenties that feel a bit much in retrospect. For Jolie, this was a period of intense self-expression. She was tattooing his name on her arm (which she later had to get removed via painful laser sessions) and wearing his T-shirts.
Actually, the blood necklaces weren't even the weirdest part of the relationship if you listen to the rumors from that era. There were stories about them buying side-by-side burial plots. There was the constant, over-the-top PDA. But the blood is what stuck. It's the "hook" that stays in the cultural memory because it's so visceral.
The fascinating thing is how Billy Bob talks about it now. He’s usually very self-deprecating. In an interview with The Hollywood Reporter, he basically said that the whole thing was blown out of proportion because they were "the couple of the moment." If two indie musicians did it today, nobody would care. But because it was Lara Croft and the guy from Bad Santa, it became legendary.
✨ Don't miss: How Tall is Tim Curry? What Fans Often Get Wrong About the Legend's Height
Deconstructing the "Vampire" Narrative
People love a good "crazy celebrity" story. It makes us feel more normal.
There's a specific kind of E-E-A-T (Experience, Expertise, Authoritativeness, and Trustworthiness) required when looking at celebrity history. You have to look at the primary sources. If you watch the old interviews from the Gone in 60 Seconds premiere, you see two people who are clearly, deeply infatuated. They weren't trying to be scary. They were trying to be intimate.
The Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie blood necklaces were, in their minds, no different than wearing a wedding ring. It’s a physical manifestation of a spiritual bond. Of course, most people just use gold or diamonds. Using bodily fluids is... a choice.
But was it dangerous? No. Was it a cult? Definitely not. It was just two eccentric artists living in a bubble of fame where nobody ever told them "maybe don't do that."
What Happened to the Jewelry?
After the divorce in 2003, the necklaces vanished.
You don't exactly put "vial of ex-husband's blood" up for auction at Sotheby’s. It’s generally assumed they were either destroyed or tucked away in a box of old memories that neither of them wants to open. Jolie went on to become a UN Special Envoy and a mother of six, pivoting her image from "goth rebel" to "global humanitarian." Billy Bob continued his streak of being one of the most reliable character actors in the business.
The tattoos were covered up. The blood was likely tossed.
🔗 Read more: Brandi Love Explained: Why the Businesswoman and Adult Icon Still Matters in 2026
But the legend remains because it represents a time in Hollywood that doesn't exist anymore. Everything is so sterilized now. Every PR move is calculated by a team of twenty people. Back then, you could just show up to the Golden Globes with a smear of blood around your neck and just... exist.
Lessons from the Blood Locket Era
If you’re looking for a takeaway from the whole Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie blood saga, it’s probably about the transience of "forever."
Everything about their relationship was branded as permanent. The tattoos. The blood. The public declarations of eternal devotion. And then, three years later, it was over. It’s a reminder that even the most intense, "written in blood" romances can fizzle out.
It also highlights the massive gap between celebrity reality and tabloid fiction.
- Check the scale. When you hear a wild celebrity story, it’s usually 10% fact and 90% hyperbole. The "vials" were lockets.
- Context matters. What looks like a "ritual" in a headline is often just a bored couple trying to be edgy on a Tuesday.
- Trends cycle. We’re seeing a return to this kind of "intense" celebrity branding today, proving that humans are perpetually fascinated by the macabre.
Moving Beyond the Hype
If you're fascinated by this era of pop culture, don't just stop at the headlines. Look at the filmography of the people involved. Thornton’s work in the early 2000s is genuinely some of the best acting of that decade. Jolie’s transition from this "blood necklace" phase into her work with the UNHCR is one of the most successful image rebrands in history.
To truly understand the Billy Bob Thornton and Angelina Jolie blood phenomenon, you have to look at it as a piece of performance art. It wasn't meant to be "normal." It was meant to be felt.
Actionable Steps for Pop Culture Enthusiasts
- Audit the Source: Next time you see a "shocking" celebrity fact, look for the original video interview. You'll often find the tone is much lighter than the article suggests.
- Study the Rebrand: Use Angelina Jolie’s career as a case study in how to pivot from a "wild" reputation to a "respected" one. It’s a masterclass in PR.
- Preserve History: If you’re a collector, look for the physical media (magazines, posters) from this era. Digital articles change, but the original print coverage of the Thornton-Jolie era is a time capsule of pre-social media celebrity culture.
The era of the blood necklace is over, but the human desire to do something "crazy" for love is pretty much eternal. Just maybe stick to jewelry that doesn't require a bandage.
Source References:
- The Hollywood Reporter - Billy Bob Thornton Interview (2014)
- Entertainment Weekly - Red Carpet Archives (2000-2002)
- The New York Times - Profiles of Angelina Jolie (Post-2003)