Red. That’s the first thing you think of when you see a pic of planet mars. It's the "Red Planet," after all. But if you were actually standing in the middle of Gale Crater, looking at your boots, the colors might confuse you. It’s not just a flat, rust-colored filter. In reality, Mars is a messy, moody palette of butterscotch, greenish-grey, and deep salmon.
The images we get from the Perseverance rover or the older Curiosity data aren't just snapshots taken with a digital camera like the one on your phone. They're data sets. When NASA releases a new pic of planet mars, they are often making a choice between "natural color"—what a human eye would supposedly see—and "enhanced color," which is basically a scientific highlighter used to show different minerals.
It’s actually pretty wild how much work goes into a single frame.
The Science Behind the Camera Lens
Taking a photo on Earth is easy because the light is predictable. On Mars, the atmosphere is thin, dusty, and scatters light in ways that make the sky look pinkish-red during the day and blue at sunset. Yeah, you read that right. Martian sunsets are blue because the fine dust particles are just the right size to let blue light penetrate the atmosphere more efficiently than the longer-wavelength red light.
Cameras like Mastcam-Z on Perseverance use filters. These filters look at specific wavelengths. Scientists then have to "calibrate" these images using a calibration target—a small, sundial-like device mounted on the rover that has blocks of known colors. If the camera knows what "true red" looks like on that target under the Martian sun, it can adjust the rest of the image to match.
But even then, it's subjective.
Sometimes, the "raw" pic of planet mars looks incredibly washed out. To make it useful for geologists, they crank the contrast. This helps them tell the difference between a volcanic basalt rock and a sedimentary mudstone. If they didn't do this, everything would just look like a blurry pile of cinnamon.
Why the Colors Keep Changing
You might notice that a pic of planet mars from the 1970s Viking landers looks totally different from a high-res shot from 2024. Part of that is technology, obviously. But part of it is the processing philosophy. Early images were often balanced to look "Earth-like" because scientists wanted to compare Martian geography to places like the Arizona desert.
👉 See also: Pi Coin Price in USD: Why Most Predictions Are Completely Wrong
By pretending the lighting is the same as Earth's, it’s easier to spot features like ancient riverbeds.
It's a bit like using a filter on Instagram to make your food look better, except here, the "better" means "scientifically readable." If you look at the raw files from the Mars Reconnaissance Orbiter (MRO), they are often eerie. The HiRISE camera on that orbiter can see things as small as a kitchen table from space. The colors in those photos are often "false color"—blue might represent basalt, while yellow or white represents clay or salts.
It’s beautiful, sure. But it’s not what you’d see if you were peeking out the window of a SpaceX Starship.
Finding Water in a Grainy Photo
We are obsessed with looking for water. Every time a new pic of planet mars drops, people zoom in on the dark streaks on crater walls. These are called Recurring Slope Lineae (RSL). For years, the big debate was: is that liquid water seeping out, or just dry sand avalanches?
Dr. Lujendra Ojha, who famously discovered evidence of liquid water on Mars while still an undergraduate, used these images to change our entire understanding of the planet's history. By looking at the "spectroscopic" signature in the pixels, he could tell there were hydrated salts.
Pixels are more than just dots of color. They are chemical signatures.
The Problem with "The Face on Mars"
We can’t talk about Martian photos without mentioning the 1976 Viking 1 image. You know the one—the giant face staring up from the Cydonia region. It looked human. It looked intentional. It launched a thousand conspiracy theories about ancient civilizations.
✨ Don't miss: Oculus Rift: Why the Headset That Started It All Still Matters in 2026
But then, in 2001, the Mars Global Surveyor took a much higher-resolution photo.
The "face" was gone.
It was just a mesa. The "eyes" and "mouth" were just shadows caused by the low angle of the sun. This is a classic example of pareidolia—the human brain’s annoying habit of seeing familiar shapes in random patterns. When you look at a pic of planet mars, your brain is actively trying to make it look like Earth. We want to see trees in the dust devils and fossils in the jagged rocks.
Honestly, though, the reality is cooler than the myths.
Where to Find the Real, Unedited Mars
If you want to see what's actually happening on the surface right now, you don't have to wait for a NASA press release. They actually dump the raw, unprocessed data onto their servers almost as soon as it hits Earth.
- The NASA Raw Image Database: You can see every single unedited pic of planet mars sent back by Perseverance and Curiosity. They are often black and white and look a bit "noisy."
- HiRISE (University of Arizona): This is the high-resolution camera orbiting the planet. Their website lets you "suggest" a target for the camera to shoot.
- The Planetary Society: They do a great job of explaining the context of what you’re looking at so you don't mistake a rock for a Martian bone.
The most recent photos from the Jezero Crater are particularly nuts. We’re seeing "delta" formations where a river once spilled into a giant lake. The pebbles are rounded. On Earth, pebbles only get rounded when they are tumbled in running water for a long time.
Seeing that in a photo—a physical record of a wet, blue Mars from billions of years ago—is pretty humbling.
🔗 Read more: New Update for iPhone Emojis Explained: Why the Pickle and Meteor are Just the Start
What to Look for in the Next Batch of Photos
The next time you see a pic of planet mars trending on social media, check the corners of the image. You can often see the "legs" of the rover or the tracks it left behind. These tracks aren't just for show; scientists use the depth of the tread marks in the soil to calculate how "fluffy" or dense the Martian regolith is.
If the rover sinks, the ground is soft. If it sits on top, it’s hard-packed.
Also, look at the sky. If it’s a pale, hazy butterscotch color, that means there is a lot of dust in the air. If the sky looks darker, almost black, it means the atmosphere is clear. Sometimes you can even see "ice clouds" made of carbon dioxide (dry ice) or water ice.
Mars isn't a dead rock. It’s a dynamic, shifting world. It's just a bit lonelier than ours.
Next Steps for Mars Enthusiasts:
To get the most out of Martian photography, start by exploring the Mars Perseverance Raw Images portal. Instead of looking at the polished "official" photos, browse the raw files to see the planet's true, gritty textures. Download a few and try adjusting the "Levels" or "Curves" in a basic photo editor; you'll quickly see how a "blue" rock can suddenly appear when you shift the white balance. Finally, use the HiWish program by the University of Arizona to see if your favorite Martian landmark has been photographed in high-def recently.