You’ve probably seen a pic of a mummy while scrolling through a museum's Instagram or a clickbaity history article and felt that weird mix of "wow" and "ew." It’s natural. We are wired to look at faces, even ones that haven't blinked in three thousand years. But there is a massive gap between what you see in a digital image and what is actually sitting under the glass in Cairo or London. Most of these photos are heavily edited for drama. They crank up the shadows to make the eye sockets look deeper or sharpen the texture of the linen to make it look "ancienter" than it already is. Honestly, it’s a bit of a disservice to the actual science.
Mummification wasn't just about making a scary-looking corpse. It was a high-tech chemical process involving natron—a naturally occurring salt—and expensive resins that basically turned human tissue into something closer to leather or plastic. When you look at a high-resolution pic of a mummy today, you aren't just looking at "old skin." You're looking at a complex archaeological record of religious belief, wealth, and surprisingly advanced chemistry.
What a Pic of a Mummy Actually Reveals (If You Know Where to Look)
The first thing people notice is the teeth. Why are they so white? Ancient Egyptians didn't have Fluoride, but they also didn't have refined sugar. However, if you look closely at a clear pic of a mummy like Ramses II, you’ll notice the teeth are worn down to the nubs. This happened because their bread was full of sand and grit from the grinding stones. They had great color but terrible structural integrity. They were literally chewing on rocks.
Then there’s the nose. You've probably seen photos where the nose looks stuffed or weirdly shaped. That’s because it often is. During the New Kingdom, embalmers would sometimes stuff the nostrils with seeds or small stones to help the face keep its shape after the moisture was sucked out by the salt. If they didn't do this, the face would just collapse into a flat, unrecognizable mask.
✨ Don't miss: 100 Biggest Cities in the US: Why the Map You Know is Wrong
The CT Scan Revolution
In the last decade, the way we produce a pic of a mummy has shifted from external photography to internal "slices." Scientists like Dr. Sahar Saleem and the late Zahi Hawass have used CT scans to look under the bandages without actually unwrapping them. This is huge. Unwrapping a mummy is destructive and, frankly, a bit of an ethical nightmare by modern standards.
These scans have revealed things a standard camera never could:
- Hidden amulets made of gold or faience tucked into the layers of linen.
- Evidence of heart disease and arthritis in "healthy" royals.
- Murder mysteries, like the "Screaming Mummy" (Prince Pentawere), whose throat was found to be constricted, suggesting a violent end.
The Problem with Lighting and "Aesthetic" Archaeology
The lighting in a museum is designed to preserve the artifact, not to help your phone camera. It’s usually dim and yellowish. When someone takes a pic of a mummy and posts it, they usually slap a filter on it to make it look more like a scene from a horror movie. This creates a false impression. In reality, many mummies have a dark, glossy sheen because they were literally dunked in bitumen—the same stuff we use for roads. In fact, the word "mummy" comes from the Persian word mummia, which means bitumen.
🔗 Read more: Cooper City FL Zip Codes: What Moving Here Is Actually Like
Early explorers actually thought the black color was just dirt or rot, but it was a deliberate choice. It was meant to link the deceased to Osiris, the god of the underworld, who was often depicted with black skin representing the fertile silt of the Nile.
Ethical Photography: Is it Okay to Post These?
This is a heated debate in the museum world right now. Some argue that a pic of a mummy is a photo of a human being who never gave consent to be a tourist attraction. Museums like the British Museum and the Fitzwilliam Museum in Cambridge have even started rethinking their signage. They often refer to them as "mummified persons" now to remind us that these weren't just objects. They were people with names, families, and a very specific desire to be left alone in the dark forever.
When you share a photo of a mummy, you're participating in a tradition that started with "mummy unwrapping parties" in the Victorian era. Back then, it was a social event. Today, it’s a digital one. It’s worth asking if we’re losing the "human" part of the equation when we hunt for the most "spectacular" shot.
💡 You might also like: Why People That Died on Their Birthday Are More Common Than You Think
How to Spot a Fake or "Enhanced" Pic of a Mummy
The internet is full of "alien mummies" and "giant mummies." 99% of these are plaster casts or taxidermy experiments. If you see a pic of a mummy where the proportions look like a Grey Alien (large head, tiny body, three fingers), it’s almost certainly a fabrication. Real mummies, even the most poorly preserved ones, follow human skeletal logic. Bone doesn't shrink that much.
Look for the "crackle." Real mummified skin has a very specific texture—it looks like old bookbinding. It doesn't look like smooth plastic or grey clay. If the texture is too uniform, it’s a prop. Also, check the context. Real mummies are almost never photographed outside of a climate-controlled box or a laboratory setting. If you see one sitting in a "tomb" with perfect lighting and no glass, it’s a movie set.
Preservation is a Constant Battle
Light is the enemy. Every time a flash goes off—even though they tell you not to use them—the photons hit the organic fibers of the linen and the skin. Over years, this causes fading and structural breakdown. This is why the Royal Mummies Gallery in Cairo is so strict. They want these "people" to last another three thousand years. Digital photography is a double-edged sword: it documents them for history, but the process of getting the "perfect shot" can be physically damaging if not done by professionals with specialized equipment.
Practical Steps for the Curious
If you are genuinely interested in the science of what you're seeing in a pic of a mummy, don't just look at Pinterest or Instagram. Those are curated for vibes.
- Visit Digital Archives: Sites like the Theban Mapping Project or the Brooklyn Museum’s digital collection offer high-resolution, unedited photos that show the actual color and texture of the remains.
- Look for the "In Situ" Photos: These are photos taken exactly as the mummy was found. They are often messy and covered in dust, but they tell a much truer story than the cleaned-up museum versions.
- Understand the Taphonomy: That's just a fancy word for what happens to a body after death. If a mummy looks "skeletal," it might be from a period where the embalming wasn't as great, like the First Intermediate Period. If it looks "fleshy," it’s probably from the 21st Dynasty, which was the peak of the craft.
- Follow Real Bioarchaeologists: People like Dr. Brenna Hassett or the teams at the University of Warsaw’s Mummy Project post actual updates on findings that haven't been filtered through a "spooky" lens.
Next time you see a pic of a mummy, look past the "creep factor." Look at the way the linen was folded. Notice the tiny details, like a ring still on a finger or the way the hair was styled. Those are the things that bridge the gap between "ancient artifact" and "human being." That’s where the real history is hiding.