Look back at June 2018 for a second. The vibe was different. We were all obsessed with the idea that a 7-footer who could run like a deer was the only way to win in the modern NBA. If you pull up almost any mock nba draft 2018 from that spring, you’ll see the same names at the top, usually in the same order. Deandre Ayton. Marvin Bagley III. Maybe Luka Doncic if the writer was feeling "European-savvy," but even then, there was this weird, lingering skepticism about whether a kid from Real Madrid could handle the "athleticism" of the league. It's hilarious now. Honestly, it's a bit embarrassing for the scouting community.
We thought we knew. We didn't.
The 2018 class was hyped as a transformative group, and in many ways, it was. But the gap between the projected "locks" and the actual superstars is a chasm. When experts were putting together their final mock nba draft 2018 boards, the Phoenix Suns were essentially locked in on Ayton because he was the local hero from Arizona. He had the physique of a Greek god. He looked like the next David Robinson. Meanwhile, a chubby-cheeked kid in Slovenia was dismantling grown men in the second-best league in the world, and half the NBA front offices were worried about his "lateral quickness."
The Ayton vs. Luka Debate: A Study in Process Failure
If you go back to the consensus mock nba draft 2018 rankings, Ayton was the heavy favorite for the #1 spot. It made sense at the time, or at least we told ourselves it did. Phoenix needed a center. Ayton was efficient. He had soft hands. But the mistake wasn't just physical; it was a failure to recognize where the game was going.
The league was moving toward playmaking and gravity.
Luka Doncic had gravity.
Even though many mock drafts had Luka at #2 or #3, the Sacramento Kings famously passed on him for Marvin Bagley III. Why? Because Bagley was "the better fit" for their fast-paced system. Imagine that. Passing on a generational talent because you’re worried about how he fits with Willie Cauley-Stein or De'Aaron Fox. Bagley was a double-double machine at Duke, but he didn't have a right hand, and his defensive IQ was... well, it wasn't great. Most mock drafts at the time praised the Kings for taking the "high-motor" athlete. They were wrong.
💡 You might also like: NFL Free Agents That Are Still Available: Why the 2026 Market is Getting Weird
The Dallas Mavericks, however, saw the board differently. They traded up with Atlanta (who took Trae Young) to snag Luka at #3. It was a masterstroke. While the mock nba draft 2018 experts were debating wingspans, Mark Cuban and Donnie Nelson were looking at EuroLeague MVP trophies.
The Trae Young Factor
You can't talk about this draft without Trae.
People forget how polarizing he was. Some mocks had him falling out of the top ten because of his size. "He's too small," they said. "He’ll get bullied." Sound familiar? It’s the same thing they said about Steph Curry. Trae ended up going #5 after the trade, and honestly, the Hawks didn't do half bad. He's an All-Star. He led them to a Conference Final. But in the context of a mock nba draft 2018, the variance on Trae was wilder than almost any other player.
The Mid-First Round Sleepers We All Missed
The real value of looking at an old mock nba draft 2018 isn't seeing who went #1. It's seeing who went #10 through #20. This is where the "experts" usually lose the plot.
Take Mikal Bridges. He went #10 to the 76ers (then got traded to Phoenix). Most mocks had him right in that 8-12 range because he was a "safe" 3-and-D prospect from Villanova. He turned out to be way more than that. He became the "Iron Man" of the league and a fringe All-Star.
Then there’s Shai Gilgeous-Alexander.
Go back and look.
Shai was often mocked in the late lottery, around 11 or 12. The Clippers took him at #11 after a trade with Charlotte. Nobody—and I mean nobody—predicted he would become a First Team All-NBA player and an MVP candidate. He was seen as a "lanky guard with good instincts." The draft community failed to account for his insane work ethic and how his unorthodox rhythm would translate to the NBA level.
🔗 Read more: Why the NCAA Tournament 2016 Bracket Still Breaks Our Brains
- Jaren Jackson Jr. (Mocked high, stayed high): He was the darling of the analytics community.
- Wendell Carter Jr. (The "safe" pick): He's had a solid career, but never hit that superstar ceiling.
- Kevin Knox (The "workout warrior"): He climbed up mocks because he shot the ball well in an empty gym. A classic trap.
Why the "Safe" Picks Are Often the Most Dangerous
There is a recurring theme in every mock nba draft 2018 you’ll find online: the obsession with "floor."
Writers loved Mohamed Bamba. He had a 7'10" wingspan. He was the "safe" defensive anchor. He went #6 to Orlando. Meanwhile, players with "lower floors" but higher IQs were pushed down. This is the fundamental flaw in draft coverage. We value what we can measure (height, speed, vertical) over what actually wins games (decision-making, shooting gravity, emotional intelligence).
Michael Porter Jr. is another fascinating case study. If not for the back injuries, he was a consensus #1 talent. Every mock nba draft 2018 had him sliding, but nobody knew where the floor was. He fell to Denver at #14. That’s a championship-level steal, even with the missed games. It shows that sometimes, the "risk" is the only thing worth taking in the mid-first round.
- Ayton: Solid starter, but not a franchise-changer.
- Bagley: A journeyman.
- Doncic: A legend in the making.
- Jaren Jackson Jr.: Defensive Player of the Year.
- Trae Young: Elite offensive engine.
The disparity is staggering.
Lessons for Future Scouting
So, what do we actually do with this info? If you're looking at drafts today, you have to stop scouting the jersey and start scouting the "it" factor. Every single player who overperformed their mock nba draft 2018 position—Luka, Shai, Jalen Brunson (who went in the second round!)—had elite basketball IQ and a history of winning at high levels.
Brunson is the funniest one. He was the National Player of the Year at Villanova. He won two championships. And he fell to #33? Because he was "too small and slow"? It’s the same mistake over and over.
We get blinded by the "prototypical" NBA frame.
If a guy is 6'9" and can jump out of the gym, we'll invent a jumper for him in our heads. If a guy is 6'2" and kills everyone on the court, we'll find reasons why he won't do it at the next level.
Actionable Insights for Evaluating Talent
If you want to move past the surface-level analysis of a standard mock nba draft 2018, focus on these three things:
1. Production over Potential
Stop falling in love with "potential" if there’s no production to back it up. Luka was the most productive teenager in the history of European basketball. The stats were there. The wins were there. If the production is elite against high-level competition, the "athleticism" concerns usually don't matter.
2. The "Second Jump" and Lateral Quickness Myth
Scouts obsessed over Bagley’s "second jump." It didn't matter because he couldn't guard a pick-and-roll. When reading a mock draft, look for mentions of defensive versatility. If a player can only guard one position, their value is capped, regardless of how high they can jump.
3. Shooting Gravity
In the 2018 class, the players who stayed relevant are the ones who can either shoot or create shots for others. It sounds simple, but every year, teams draft "non-shooters" in the top ten hoping they’ll develop a stroke. It rarely happens as quickly as they need it to.
To truly understand the 2018 draft, you have to look at the "misses" as much as the "hits." It wasn't just a bad year for scouts; it was a transition year for the sport. We were moving away from the "Big Man" era and fully into the "Skill" era. The mocks just hadn't caught up yet.
Keep these filters in mind next time you see a "guaranteed" #1 pick. The consensus is often just a comfortable lie we all agree on until the actual games start. Go back and check the tape. The signs for Luka and Shai were always there; we were just too busy measuring Deandre Ayton’s standing reach to notice.
Check the historical win shares for this class. You'll find that the "unathletic" guys are the ones holding the trophies. That's the real takeaway from the 2018 cycle. Focus on the processing speed of the brain, not just the speed of the 40-yard dash. It'll save you from a lot of scouting heartbreak.