It feels like a lifetime ago when the headlines first broke. In the middle of a global pandemic that had everyone locked in their houses and scrubbing groceries with bleach, the U.S. made a move that left the world's jaw on the floor. On July 6, 2020, the Trump administration officially submitted a notice to the United Nations. The message? We’re out. The United States was leaving the World Health Organization (WHO).
You’ve probably heard a dozen different versions of why this happened. Some say it was just politics. Others say it was about China. Honestly, it was a messy mix of both, plus a long-standing frustration with how international organizations spend American tax dollars. To really understand why did trump leave who, you have to look past the soundbites and see the specific list of grievances the White House laid out. It wasn't just a sudden whim; it was a calculated—and highly controversial—divorce.
The China Factor: Independence or Influence?
The biggest, loudest reason given for the split was China. Basically, the Trump administration argued that the WHO had become a "puppet" for the Chinese government. During the early days of COVID-19, the White House felt the WHO took everything Beijing said at face value without actually checking the facts.
Specifically, the administration pointed to a few key moments:
- The WHO’s initial tweets in January 2020 suggesting there was "no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission," which they claimed was based on faulty Chinese data.
- The delay in declaring a Public Health Emergency of International Concern (PHEIC).
- The praise the WHO Director-General, Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus, heaped on China for its transparency, even as reports surfaced of whistleblowers being silenced in Wuhan.
Trump’s team felt the WHO was helping China "cover up" the origins of the virus. In a scathing four-page letter sent to Dr. Tedros in May 2020, Trump gave the organization 30 days to commit to "major substantive improvements." When that didn't happen to his satisfaction, he pulled the plug. It was a "reform or we leave" ultimatum that actually resulted in a departure.
The Money: Paying More for Less?
Money talks. In the world of global diplomacy, it screams.
👉 See also: The Ethical Maze of Airplane Crash Victim Photos: Why We Look and What it Costs
The U.S. has historically been the WHO's largest donor. We're talking hundreds of millions of dollars every year—roughly 15% to 22% of their entire budget depending on the year and the type of funding. Trump’s argument was pretty simple: Why are we paying the most if we aren't getting the most influence or the most protection?
He frequently compared the U.S. contribution to China’s, noting that China paid a fraction of what America did but seemed to have more sway over the organization's decisions. For a president who campaigned on "America First," this looked like a bad deal. He wanted to redirect those funds to other global health initiatives that the U.S. could control directly, rather than funneling it through a Geneva-based bureaucracy.
The Travel Ban Dispute
Remember when the U.S. restricted travel from China in late January 2020? The WHO actually came out and said that such restrictions weren't necessary and could interfere with international travel and trade.
Trump took that personally.
He viewed the travel ban as one of his most successful early moves to stop the virus. When the WHO criticized it, he saw it as proof that the organization was prioritizing "political correctness" over actual life-saving measures. To him, the WHO was getting the science wrong and the politics even worse.
✨ Don't miss: The Brutal Reality of the Russian Mail Order Bride Locked in Basement Headlines
What Actually Happened with the Withdrawal?
Here is where it gets a bit technical but super important. You don't just "quit" the WHO like you quit a gym membership. There’s a process.
Under a 1948 joint resolution by Congress, the U.S. has to give a one-year notice before leaving. This meant that even though Trump started the process in July 2020, the U.S. wasn't actually scheduled to be "gone" until July 2021.
Fast forward to January 2021. Joe Biden wins the election. On his very first day in office, he signs an executive order to stop the withdrawal. So, for a while, we were back in.
However, the story didn't end there. As of early 2025, with Donald Trump back in the White House for a second term, the withdrawal process was immediately reignited. On January 20, 2025, he signed a new executive order to once again pull the United States out of the WHO. This second attempt cited many of the same issues: lack of reform, too much international bureaucracy, and a desire to keep American sovereignty over health decisions.
The 2026 Reality: Where We Stand Now
Now that we are in 2026, the dust is still settling. The U.S. has stopped its "assessed contributions" (the mandatory dues) and is in the final stages of the one-year exit window.
🔗 Read more: The Battle of the Chesapeake: Why Washington Should Have Lost
The impact is real and kinda complicated. On one hand, the U.S. is saving hundreds of millions in dues. On the other hand, we’ve lost our seat at the table where global health rules are written. For example, the U.S. is no longer part of the negotiations for the "Pandemic Treaty," a new international agreement designed to prevent the next global outbreak.
Critics, like Lawrence Gostin from Georgetown University, argue that this makes the U.S. "blind" to new viruses because we aren't part of the same data-sharing networks anymore. Supporters of the move, however, say we can just build our own networks with allies we actually trust.
What Most People Get Wrong
People often think the U.S. just stopped caring about global health. That’s not really the case. The plan was never to just let diseases run wild; it was to fund things differently. The administration has looked into boosting the CDC’s international presence or working through different groups like Gavi (the Vaccine Alliance) where they feel they have more oversight.
It's also worth noting that the WHO isn't exactly perfect. Even some of the WHO's biggest supporters agree the organization needs a massive overhaul. It’s slow, it’s underfunded, and it’s often caught in the crossfire of geopolitical rivalries. The debate isn't really about whether the WHO is flawed—it’s about whether you fix it from the inside or walk away and build something better.
Actionable Insights: What This Means for You
If you're wondering how this affects your daily life, here’s the bottom line:
- Vaccine Data: The U.S. now has to work harder to get early samples of new virus strains (like the seasonal flu) because we aren't automatically in the WHO loop. This could potentially affect how quickly new vaccines are developed each year.
- Travel Safety: Keep a closer eye on State Department travel advisories. Without the WHO's central "all-clear" or "warning" system being the primary guide for the U.S., our own domestic agencies (like the CDC) are taking the lead on deciding which countries are safe to visit.
- Tax Dollars: You might see more news about "bilateral" health deals—meaning the U.S. giving money directly to a specific country to fight malaria or AIDS, rather than giving it to a global pot.
The question of why did trump leave who isn't just a history lesson; it's a look at how America sees its role in the world. Whether it was a bold stand for sovereignty or a dangerous retreat from global cooperation is still being debated in the halls of Congress and at kitchen tables across the country.
Stay informed by checking the official U.S. State Department updates and the CDC's Global Health page for the latest on how America is tracking outbreaks outside of the WHO framework. Knowledge is the only real way to stay safe in a world where germs don't care about borders or treaties.