On a warm August night in 1989, Beverly Hills changed forever. It wasn't just the sound of shotgun blasts in a quiet mansion on Elm Drive. It was the aftermath. For years, people have been obsessed with one question: Why did the Menendez brothers kill their parents? If you ask the prosecution from the nineties, it was greed. Pure and simple. They wanted the $14 million fortune. But if you listen to Lyle and Erik, the story is much darker. It’s a story of survival, or at least, that’s what they want the world to believe.
Jose and Kitty Menendez were watching TV when their sons walked in. They didn't stand a chance. It was brutal. The crime scene was so messy that police originally thought it was a mob hit. Why would two preppy, tennis-playing brothers do this?
Most people remember the shopping spree. In the months after the funeral, Lyle and Erik spent roughly $700,000 on Rolexes, cars, and even a restaurant. That’s the "greed" narrative. But looking back today, especially with new evidence surfacing in the last couple of years, that explanation feels kinda thin. People don’t usually blow their lives up just for a watch.
The Defense Case: A "Perfect" Family's Secret
During the first trial, which was televised and became a national sensation, the brothers dropped a bombshell. They claimed they had been victims of horrific sexual, physical, and emotional abuse at the hands of their father, Jose. They said Kitty, their mother, knew about it but did nothing—or worse, participated in the psychological torment.
This is the crux of why they claim they did it. It wasn't about the money, they said. It was about "imperfect self-defense."
They were terrified.
According to their testimony, the nights leading up to the murders were filled with escalating tension. They believed their parents were going to kill them to keep the family secrets quiet. Think about that for a second. You're living in a mansion, you have everything, but you’re convinced your own father is going to murder you in your sleep. That kind of pressure does something to the brain.
The Roy Rosselló Connection
For decades, many people thought the abuse claims were a legal "hail mary." A lie to stay out of the gas chamber. But things changed recently. Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, came forward in the Peacock docuseries Menendez + Menudo: Boys Betrayed. He alleged that Jose Menendez—who was a powerful executive at RCA Records at the time—had also drugged and raped him when he was a teenager.
📖 Related: Howie Mandel Cupcake Picture: What Really Happened With That Viral Post
This isn't just hearsay anymore. This is a pattern.
When you look at why did the Menendez brothers kill their parents through the lens of Rosselló’s allegations, the brothers' testimony starts to look a lot more like a lived reality and less like a scripted courtroom drama. If Jose was doing this to kids outside the home, what was he doing to his own sons?
Two Trials, Two Very Different Outcomes
The first trial ended in a hung jury. People couldn't decide. Half the jurors saw two broken boys who snapped under the weight of lifelong trauma. The other half saw two spoiled brats who executed their parents in cold blood.
Then came the second trial.
Judge Stanley Weisberg made a controversial call. He stripped the defense of most of its abuse testimony. He basically told the jury they couldn't consider the brothers' fear as a valid reason for the killings. Without the context of the alleged abuse, the jury saw exactly what the prosecution wanted them to see: two killers and a big inheritance.
They were sentenced to life without parole.
- Trial 1: Massive media circus, hung juries, focus on trauma.
- Trial 2: No cameras allowed, limited abuse testimony, conviction.
Honestly, the difference between the two trials is the reason we are still talking about this today. If the second jury had heard everything the first jury heard, would Lyle and Erik still be in San Diego’s Richard J. Donovan Correctional Facility? Probably not for life.
👉 See also: Austin & Ally Maddie Ziegler Episode: What Really Happened in Homework & Hidden Talents
The Psychological "Snap"
Let's talk about the biology of fear. When a human being is subjected to chronic trauma, the amygdala—the brain's fear center—becomes hyper-reactive. Experts like Dr. Ann Burgess, who testified for the defense, argued that the brothers were in a state of "learned helplessness" and "hyper-vigilance."
They weren't planning a heist. They were reacting to a perceived threat that had been building for twenty years.
You have to wonder why they didn't just move out. Lyle was 21. Erik was 18. They were adults! But trauma doesn't work that way. It keeps you small. It keeps you trapped in the "child" role. The prosecution pointed to the fact that they bought the guns days in advance as proof of premeditation. The defense countered that they bought the guns because they were scared they were being hunted. It’s a classic "he said, she said," but with bodies on the floor.
The Role of Kitty Menendez
Kitty is often the forgotten piece of this puzzle. Why kill her? She wasn't the primary abuser, according to the brothers. Lyle and Erik claimed she was a broken woman, addicted to substances and completely under Jose’s thumb. They described her as "erratic."
They said they killed her to "put her out of her misery" and because she was a witness. It sounds cold. It is cold. But in the distorted logic of a domestic abuse survivor who has finally snapped, it made sense to them at the time. They felt they had to wipe the slate clean.
The 2024/2025 Legal Shift
Right now, the Los Angeles District Attorney’s office is reviewing new evidence. This includes a letter Erik wrote to his cousin, Andy Cano, eight months before the murders. In that letter, Erik explicitly mentions the abuse.
"I've been trying to avoid dad. It's still happening Andy, but it's worse for me now."
✨ Don't miss: Kiss My Eyes and Lay Me to Sleep: The Dark Folklore of a Viral Lullaby
This letter is a "smoking gun" for many. It proves that the brothers weren't just making up stories after they got caught. They were talking about it before the triggers were ever pulled. This is why the question of why did the Menendez brothers kill their parents is being re-examined by the justice system. If the motive was trauma and not money, the charge should have been manslaughter, not first-degree murder.
Common Misconceptions That Won't Die
You've probably heard that they killed their parents because Jose was going to disinherit them. There was a rumor about a new will. But no such will was ever found.
Another big one: the "billionaire" lifestyle. While they were wealthy, Jose wasn't a billionaire. He was a high-level executive, but the fortune wasn't as bottomless as the media made it out to be. The shopping spree was real, but psychologists often point out that "manic spending" is a common coping mechanism for people who have just experienced a massive trauma or a life-altering event. It’s a way to feel in control when your world is spinning out.
What This Means for Today
The Menendez case isn't just a true crime story. It’s a mirror for how we treat male victims of sexual abuse. In the nineties, the idea that a powerful man could abuse his athletic, "privileged" sons was laughable to many. Today, we know better. We've seen the scandals in Hollywood, in sports, and in the church.
We are finally starting to understand that wealth doesn't protect you from pain.
If you're looking for a simple answer, you won't find one. They killed their parents because of a toxic cocktail of generational trauma, alleged systemic sexual abuse, and a moment of pure, unadulterated terror. Whether you believe that justifies their actions or not, the "money" motive is looking weaker every single day.
Understanding the Facts: Next Steps
If you want to understand the full scope of this case beyond the headlines, you need to look at the primary sources.
- Read the Habeas Corpus Petition: The latest legal filings from 2023 and 2024 contain the Roy Rosselló affidavit and the Andy Cano letter. These are the documents that might actually get them out of prison.
- Watch the First Trial Footage: Much of it is available on YouTube. Pay attention to the testimony of Dr. Vicary and Dr. Burgess. It provides the clinical context for the "snap."
- Differentiate Between "Justification" and "Excuse": In legal terms, the brothers aren't saying it was "right" to kill their parents. They are arguing that the crime was committed under extreme emotional distress, which changes the legal classification of the act.
The Menendez case remains a landmark study in how the justice system handles domestic violence when the victims don't look like "typical" victims. As the DA's office decides whether to resentence them, the world is finally forced to look at the "why" with a lot more nuance than we had in 1989.