August 20, 1989. It was a Sunday night in Beverly Hills. Lyle and Erik Menendez walked into their family’s den and opened fire with 12-gauge shotguns. Their father, Jose, died instantly. Their mother, Kitty, didn’t. She tried to crawl away. They finished her off with a shot to the face.
For decades, the world has wrestled with a single, haunting question: why did the Menendez brothers kill their mom? If you ask the prosecution from the 1990s, they’ll tell you it was about money. Pure greed. A couple of rich kids wanting to fast-track their inheritance. But if you listen to the brothers—and the mountain of evidence that has resurfaced recently—the answer is way more disturbing. It’s a story of systemic sexual abuse, psychological torture, and a mother who, according to her sons, didn't just fail to protect them but actively participated in the nightmare.
The Motive That Divided a Nation
The first trial in 1993 was a media circus. It was the original "true crime" obsession before podcasts even existed. People were glued to Court TV. Lyle and Erik sat there, in their knit sweaters, looking like prep school kids, and told stories that made the jury weep. They claimed their father, Jose Menendez, had sexually and physically abused them for years.
But why Kitty? Why did they kill their mother?
Honestly, the "why" regarding Kitty Menendez is often harder for people to wrap their heads around than the "why" regarding Jose. Jose was the primary aggressor. He was the powerhouse executive at RCA and LIVE Entertainment. He was the one they feared. Kitty, however, was a more complex figure in the brothers' narrative. According to the defense, led by the formidable Leslie Abramson, Kitty was a "facilitator."
She wasn't just a bystander.
The brothers testified that Kitty would sometimes hold them down while Jose abused them. Or she would ignore the screams. Or, in moments of her own instability, she would lash out. Erik described her as a woman who had "checked out" of her role as a protector. When they finally decided to act, they didn't see two parents; they saw two monsters who were eventually going to kill them to keep the family secrets quiet.
The "Perfect" Family Facade
To understand why they did it, you have to look at the Menendez home life. It wasn't just wealthy; it was high-pressure. Jose was a "success at all costs" kind of guy. He pushed his sons to be elite athletes and scholars. Failure wasn't an option.
Kitty Menendez was a former beauty queen who struggled with depression and, allegedly, substance issues. The brothers painted a picture of a household where the doors didn't have locks and privacy was a sin. Jose was a tyrant. Kitty was his enabler.
💡 You might also like: Doomsday Castle TV Show: Why Brent Sr. and His Kids Actually Built That Fortress
The brothers claimed that in the days leading up to the murders, the tension reached a breaking point. They had finally confronted their father about the abuse. They thought he was going to kill them to protect his reputation. In their minds, it was a "kill or be killed" scenario. Kitty was included in that because, in the brothers' eyes, she was an extension of Jose. They believed she would never take their side.
The Money Narrative: Was It Just for the Will?
You can't talk about why did the Menendez brothers kill their mom without talking about the Rolexes and the Porsches.
After the murders, before they were even suspects, Lyle and Erik went on a spending spree. They blew roughly $700,000 in just six months. Lyle bought a Rolex, a Porsche Carrera, and several high-end clothing items. Erik hired a full-time tennis coach. They were living the high life while their parents were barely in the ground.
This was the "smoking gun" for the prosecution.
District Attorney David Conn argued that the abuse story was a total fabrication. A "men’s line" of defense designed to get sympathy. To the state, the motive was simple: the brothers were spoiled, they were about to be written out of the will, and they wanted the $14 million estate right then and there.
Wait. Let's look at that.
If you’re a 18 and 21-year-old who has just "escaped" a lifetime of torture, do you act rationally? The defense argued that the spending wasn't a sign of cold-blooded greed, but a "manic" reaction to newfound freedom. They were trying to buy the happiness they never had. It sounds a bit thin to some, but to others, it makes sense in the context of extreme trauma.
The New Evidence: The Roy Rosselló Allegations
For years, the "abuse" defense was dismissed by many as a legal trick. Then, the Netflix documentary and the Menendez + Menudo series dropped.
📖 Related: Don’t Forget Me Little Bessie: Why James Lee Burke’s New Novel Still Matters
Roy Rosselló, a former member of the boy band Menudo, came forward with a bombshell. He claimed that Jose Menendez had drugged and raped him when he was a teenager. This was huge. It provided independent corroboration that Jose Menendez was a sexual predator.
Suddenly, the brothers' stories didn't seem so "convenient" anymore. If Jose was doing this to a famous pop star, why wouldn't he be doing it to his own sons? This shift in public perception has led many to reconsider why Kitty had to die too. If the abuse was that pervasive and that violent, Kitty’s silence—or her active participation—became a death sentence.
A Mother’s Betrayal
In most families, the mother is the safety net.
For Lyle and Erik, Kitty was the person who allegedly ripped their toupees off (Lyle started losing his hair early due to stress) and mocked their pain. Erik testified that when he tried to tell her about the abuse, she told him to "deal with it."
That kind of betrayal does something to the psyche. It creates a specific type of rage. When they burst into that room with the shotguns, they weren't just killing their father. They were killing the woman who watched it happen and did nothing.
They saw her as a co-conspirator.
In the second trial, the judge excluded much of the abuse testimony. The jury wasn't allowed to hear the full extent of what the brothers claimed had happened to them. This trial resulted in a first-degree murder conviction and life without parole. No "imperfect self-defense." No manslaughter. Just cold, hard murder.
The Psychological Breakdown
Let’s be real: killing your parents with a shotgun is an incredibly intimate and violent act. It’s not a "poison in the tea" kind of crime. It’s messy. It’s loud.
👉 See also: Donnalou Stevens Older Ladies: Why This Viral Anthem Still Hits Different
Psychologists who have studied the case often point to "Battered Child Syndrome." It’s similar to how a battered spouse eventually snaps. The brothers were living in a state of hyper-vigilance. They were convinced that their parents were discussing how to dispose of them. Was it a delusion? Maybe. But to them, the threat was real.
They killed Kitty because she was part of the unit that threatened their existence. In their warped reality, they couldn't kill Jose and leave Kitty alive. She would have been the witness. She would have been the one to send them to the chair. Or, she would have continued the cycle of control.
Where the Case Stands in 2026
The conversation around why did the Menendez brothers kill their mom has shifted dramatically because of how we understand trauma today. In 1993, male sexual abuse was a "taboo" topic. People laughed about it. Late-night talk show hosts made jokes.
Today, we have a much more nuanced understanding of how trauma affects the brain.
- The Habeas Corpus Petition: The brothers' lawyers filed new petitions based on the Rosselló evidence and a letter Erik wrote to his cousin months before the murders, detailing the abuse.
- Public Sentiment: Social media, specifically "Gen Z" on TikTok, has championed the brothers’ release, viewing them as victims of a failed legal system.
- District Attorney Review: There has been ongoing pressure on the L.A. County D.A.'s office to resentence the brothers or grant them a new trial.
Moving Beyond the "Greed" Myth
It’s easy to say they did it for the money. It’s a clean narrative. It makes sense to a cynical world. But if you look at the brutality of the crime and the psychological wreckage that followed, the "greed" motive feels incomplete.
Greedy people usually try to get away with it. They don't break down and confess to their therapist (which is how the brothers were eventually caught). They don't spend decades in prison maintaining the same harrowing story of abuse, even when it would be easier to just "repent" and say they wanted the cash.
Why did they kill her? They killed her because, in the dark, suffocating world of the Menendez mansion, she was no longer their mother. She was an accomplice to their destruction.
Next Steps for True Crime Followers:
To get the most accurate picture of this case, you should move beyond the dramatizations. Start by reading the actual court transcripts from the first trial (1993). Look specifically at the testimony of Dr. Ann Burgess, an expert on trauma and sexual abuse who interviewed the brothers. Additionally, follow the updates from the Los Angeles County District Attorney’s Office regarding the pending petition for a new hearing. Understanding the distinction between "premeditated murder" and "imperfect self-defense" is key to grasping why this case remains one of the most controversial in American history.