It wasn't just a button press. People like to point at Leonid Toptunov, the young operator who was only 25 at the time, and say he messed up. Or they blame Anatoly Dyatlov for being a bully. But if you really want to know why did the accident at Chernobyl happen, you have to look at a RBMK reactor as a giant, temperamental beast that was basically designed to eat itself if things got too quiet.
It happened because of a toxic mix of bad math, state secrets, and a "safety test" that was anything but safe.
On April 26, 1986, the world changed. Northern Ukraine became the site of the worst nuclear disaster in history. We’re talking about a massive steam explosion that flipped a 2,000-ton upper biological shield—the "lid" of the reactor—like it was a coin. It wasn’t a nuclear explosion like an atomic bomb, but the radioactive fallout was staggering. To understand the "why," we have to peel back the layers of Soviet engineering and the frantic atmosphere of that Friday night.
The fatal flaw in the RBMK design
The Soviet RBMK-1000 reactor was a marvel of efficiency, but it had a "positive void coefficient." That sounds like jargon, but it’s the smoking gun. Essentially, in most Western reactors, if the cooling water turns to steam (voids), the nuclear reaction slows down. It’s self-limiting.
In an RBMK? The opposite occurs.
When water—which usually absorbs neutrons—turns to steam bubbles, the reactivity actually increases. More steam leads to more heat, which creates more steam, which creates even more heat. It’s a runaway feedback loop. Physicists like Valery Legasov knew this was a quirk of the design, but the information was classified. Operators at the plant didn't fully grasp that at low power, the reactor became a ticking time bomb.
Then there’s the "scram" button, the AZ-5.
💡 You might also like: Starliner and Beyond: What Really Happens When Astronauts Get Trapped in Space
You’d think hitting the emergency stop would save you. But the control rods in an RBMK were tipped with graphite. Graphite increases reactivity. When the operators finally hit AZ-5 to shut things down, those graphite tips entered the core first, displacing the water and causing a massive, localized spike in power. It was like trying to put out a fire by throwing a cup of gasoline on it before the water arrives.
A safety test gone wrong
Ironically, the disaster happened during a test meant to make the plant safer. The goal was to see if, during a power failure, the spinning momentum of the turbines could provide enough electricity to run the cooling pumps for 45 to 60 seconds. That’s the gap of time it took for the backup diesel generators to kick in.
They had failed this test three times before. They were desperate to get it right.
But the test was delayed. An electrical controller in Kiev requested the plant stay on the grid to meet power demands. This meant the graveyard shift, which hadn't been trained for the test, ended up inheriting the mess. By the time they were allowed to drop the power, the reactor had become "poisoned" with Xenon-135. Xenon is a gas that eats neutrons. It makes the reactor sluggish.
The power plummeted too low—down to about 30 Megawatts. It should have been at least 700 Megawatts for the test.
Toptunov and Akimov tried to bring the power back up by pulling out almost all the control rods. This is like driving a car at 100 mph with no brakes and the engine overheating. They were operating in a state that was strictly forbidden by the safety manuals, but the "safety" systems didn't stop them because many of the automatic shutdowns had been manually disabled so they wouldn't interfere with the test.
📖 Related: 1 light year in days: Why our cosmic yardstick is so weirdly massive
The sequence of the explosion
The actual explosion was a two-part punch. At 01:23:40, Akimov pressed AZ-5. Within seconds, the power surged to over 100 times the reactor's rated capacity. The fuel pellets shattered. The cooling water flashed into high-pressure steam instantly.
The first explosion was steam. It blew the roof off.
The second explosion, occurring seconds later, was likely a hydrogen explosion or the ignition of the graphite. This threw chunks of burning, highly radioactive graphite into the night air. When the firefighters arrived, they thought they were just fighting a roof fire. They didn't know the core was gone. They were walking on "clean" looking blocks of graphite that were actually emitting lethal doses of radiation every minute.
Why did the accident at Chernobyl happen? Culture and Secrecy
If we’re being honest, the accident happened because of the culture of the USSR at the time. There was a "Plan at all costs" mentality. Admitting that the RBMK had a design flaw would have been an admission of Soviet inferiority. So, the flaws were kept in secret manuals that the average engineer at the plant never saw.
Experts like Nikolai Dollezhal, the lead designer of the RBMK, defended the tech. They blamed the operators entirely. And sure, the operators broke protocols. But those protocols were written for a machine they didn't fully understand because the state didn't want them to.
The legal trial that followed in 1987 was mostly a sham. It focused on the "human error" of Dyatlov, Fomin, and Bryukhanov. While they were certainly negligent, the trial ignored the fact that the reactor was built with a "reset" button that acted as a detonator under specific conditions.
👉 See also: MP4 to MOV: Why Your Mac Still Craves This Format Change
Real-world impact and the cleanup
The numbers are still debated. The official Soviet death toll is 31. This is a joke.
The Chernobyl Forum, led by the IAEA and WHO, suggests the total death toll from long-term radiation exposure could be around 4,000. Other groups, like Greenpeace, estimate it could be as high as 90,000 or more when you factor in all of Europe.
The "Liquidators"—the hundreds of thousands of soldiers, miners, and volunteers who cleaned up the mess—bore the brunt of it. They shoveled radioactive debris off the roof of Reactor 3, sometimes working for only 40 or 90 seconds before they reached their lifetime limit of radiation. They were called "Bio-robots."
Key Factors for the Failure:
- The Positive Void Coefficient: Making the reactor unstable at low power.
- The Graphite-Tipped Control Rods: Causing a power surge during an emergency shutdown.
- Xenon Poisoning: Forcing the operators to pull out too many control rods to regain power.
- Organizational Hubris: The belief that a Soviet reactor could never fail.
- The Delayed Test: Putting an exhausted, unprepared night shift in charge of a complex experiment.
Practical takeaways and the future
Chernobyl didn't end nuclear power, but it changed how we build it. Today, the "New Safe Confinement" structure sits over the old sarcophagus, a massive silver arch designed to last 100 years.
If you're looking for the lesson here, it's about transparency. Nuclear energy is actually incredibly safe compared to coal or oil in terms of deaths per Terawatt-hour, but it requires a culture where engineers can say "No" to their bosses without fear of being fired or imprisoned.
What you can do to learn more:
- Read "Midnight in Chernobyl" by Adam Higginbotham: This is arguably the most researched book on the topic, using declassified archives to show exactly how the bureaucracy failed.
- Study the INSAG-7 Report: This is the International Nuclear Safety Advisory Group’s follow-up report from 1992. It corrected the earlier 1986 report (INSAG-1) by admitting that the reactor's design flaws were just as much to blame as the operators.
- Explore Virtual Tours: Since the 2022 conflict in Ukraine, physical tourism to the Exclusion Zone has shifted, but digital mapping projects of Pripyat show the haunting reality of what happens when technology outpaces our ability to control it.
The disaster wasn't an act of God. It was a man-made catastrophe born from the intersection of pride, poor engineering, and a desperate need to pass a test on a Friday night. By understanding the "why," we ensure that the next generation of reactors—like the small modular reactors (SMRs) being built today—are designed with "passive safety" where physics works with us, not against us.