History is usually messy, but the Great Purge was a different kind of chaos. It wasn't just a random outburst of violence or a "madman" losing his grip on reality, though that's a common story people like to tell. If you want to understand why did Stalin start the Great Purge, you have to look at a cocktail of deep-seated paranoia, a very real fear of a coming world war, and a cold, calculated need to liquidate anyone who could possibly say "no" to the Kremlin. It was about total control. Absolute, unquestionable, terrifying control.
In the mid-1930s, the Soviet Union was a pressure cooker. Joseph Stalin had won the power struggle after Lenin died, but he didn't feel safe. He looked around and saw "enemies" everywhere—in the army, in the factories, and sitting right across from him at the Politburo table.
The Kirov Murder: The Spark That Lit the Fire
It all really kicked off on December 1, 1934. Sergei Kirov, a high-ranking Bolshevik and the head of the party in Leningrad, was shot dead. Kirov was popular. Maybe too popular. Some historians, like Robert Conquest in his seminal work The Great Terror, have long suspected Stalin actually ordered the hit himself to get rid of a rival and create a pretext for the crackdown. Others, like J. Arch Getty, suggest it might have been the act of a lone gunman, Leonid Nikolayev, whose messy personal life collided with politics.
Regardless of who pulled the trigger, Stalin used the corpse as a stepping stone. He immediately passed the "Law of 1 December," which allowed for the trial and execution of "terrorists" without any real defense or appeal. It was the legal green light for mass murder. He blamed "Zinovievites" and "Trotskyites," essentially branding any political disagreement as a capital crime. This was the opening act. If you're asking why did Stalin start the Great Purge, this is the moment where theory became bloody practice.
Paranoia or Cold Logic?
Stalin wasn't just "crazy." That’s a lazy explanation. He was a practitioner of realpolitik taken to its most extreme, violent conclusion. He looked at the rise of Nazi Germany in the West and the Japanese Empire in the East. He knew a war was coming. In his mind, any internal dissent was a "Fifth Column" that would betray the USSR when the first shells started falling.
He had this obsession with "encirclement." He believed the capitalist powers were constantly plotting to infiltrate the Soviet state. To Stalin, a disgruntled general wasn't just a guy with a different opinion on tank strategy; he was a potential spy for the Abwehr. To "purify" the nation before the big war, he decided to kill everyone who might hesitate to follow his orders.
The Show Trials: Breaking the Old Guard
You’ve probably heard of the Moscow Trials. These were the public spectacles where the "Old Bolsheviks"—men who had literally fought alongside Lenin to build the USSR—suddenly confessed to being spies for the Gestapo or plotting to poison Stalin’s tea.
📖 Related: NIES: What Most People Get Wrong About the National Institute for Environmental Studies
Why confess? Because the NKVD (the secret police) was incredibly good at breaking people. Sleep deprivation, threats to family members, and non-stop "conveyor" interrogations would make almost anyone say anything.
- The Trial of the Sixteen (1936): This took out Kamenev and Zinoviev. They were the biggest names left from the revolutionary era.
- The Trial of the Seventeen (1937): Focused on "industrial saboteurs."
- The Trial of the Twenty-One (1938): This was the big one. Nikolai Bukharin, once the "darling of the party," was executed.
By the time the third trial ended, the original leadership of the Russian Revolution had been almost entirely wiped out. Stalin was the last man standing. He didn't just want them dead; he wanted them disgraced. He wanted the public to see them as "mad dogs" and "vile dregs of humanity."
The Army Was Not Exempt
One of the most baffling parts of the Great Purge was the decapitation of the Red Army. If you're worried about a German invasion, why would you kill your best generals? In 1937, Marshal Mikhail Tukhachevsky and seven other top commanders were executed after a secret trial.
Tukhachevsky was a military genius. He pioneered the "Deep Battle" theory. But he was also independent-minded and had his own power base. Stalin feared a military coup more than he feared Hitler at that moment. The purge eventually claimed:
- 3 out of 5 Marshals
- 14 out of 16 Army Commanders
- 60 out of 67 Corps Commanders
The result? When the Nazis actually did invade in 1941, the Red Army was led by terrified, inexperienced officers who were too scared to make a move without checking with Moscow first. This is a crucial piece of the puzzle when wondering why did Stalin start the Great Purge—it was a trade-off where he sacrificed national security for his own personal security.
The NKVD Order No. 00447: The Terror Reaches the Masses
While the show trials got the headlines, the real carnage happened in the basements of NKVD stations across the country. Order No. 00447, issued in July 1937, targeted "ex-kulaks," "criminals," and other "anti-Soviet elements."
👉 See also: Middle East Ceasefire: What Everyone Is Actually Getting Wrong
This wasn't about individual guilt. It was about quotas.
Local NKVD branches were literally given lists of how many people to arrest (Category 2) and how many to shoot (Category 1). Local officials, terrified of looking "soft," would often write back to Moscow asking to increase their quotas. "Please, let us shoot 2,000 more people in our district," they'd beg. It was a bureaucratic frenzy of death. People were picked up for having a foreign-sounding last name, for having a cousin in Poland, or just because a neighbor wanted their apartment.
The Role of Nikolai Yezhov
The man overseeing this was Nikolai Yezhov, the "Vanishing Commissar." He was barely five feet tall, nicknamed the "Iron Hedgehog." Under his leadership, the purge reached its peak, a period often called the Yezhovshchina. He was a fanatical executor of Stalin's will, but eventually, even he became a liability. In 1938, Stalin replaced him with Lavrentiy Beria. Yezhov was arrested, tortured, and shot. He was even airbrushed out of official photos.
That was the logic of the system: the hunter eventually becomes the prey.
Was There a Social Reason?
Some modern historians argue that the purge wasn't just Stalin's top-down command. It also tapped into a weird kind of social mobility. If you were a young, ambitious party member, how did you get a promotion? By denouncing your boss as a "wrecker." When the old manager got arrested, the young guy got the job.
This created a grassroots momentum for the terror. It turned the Soviet Union into a "society of informers." Everyone was looking over their shoulder, trying to be the first to point the finger so it wouldn't be pointed at them.
✨ Don't miss: Michael Collins of Ireland: What Most People Get Wrong
The Economic "Wrecking" Myth
The 1930s were a time of forced industrialization and famine. Things were breaking down. Machines failed, harvests were poor, and the Five-Year Plans were hitting walls. Instead of admitting that the central planning was flawed, the state needed a scapegoat.
Enter the "Wrecker."
If a factory's output dropped, it wasn't because of bad logistics; it was because an engineer was secretly sabotaging the machines on orders from Paris or Tokyo. This narrative allowed Stalin to maintain the illusion of his own infallibility. If things went wrong, it was always because of "enemies."
Why It Finally Stopped
By late 1938, the purge was literally breaking the country. The economy was stalling because all the experts were in the Gulag or dead. The administration was paralyzed. Stalin, ever the pragmatist, realized the "excesses" were now threatening his own power by making the state unmanageable.
He blamed the NKVD (specifically Yezhov) for "going too far" and wound the clock back. Most people didn't get out of the camps, but the mass executions slowed down. The damage, however, was done. The Soviet soul was scarred.
Actionable Insights: Learning from the Great Terror
Understanding why did Stalin start the Great Purge isn't just a history lesson; it's a study in how authoritarian systems operate. Here is what we can learn:
- Identify the Pretext: Large-scale political shifts often start with a single, high-profile event (like the Kirov murder) used to justify emergency powers.
- The Danger of Quotas: When success is measured by "arrests" or "outputs" without regard for individual truth, the system inevitably turns on the innocent.
- Watch for "Othering": The purge relied on labeling people as "enemies of the people" or "vermin." This dehumanization is always the precursor to mass violence.
- Bureaucratic Self-Preservation: In a culture of fear, individuals will commit atrocities just to prove their loyalty and avoid becoming a target themselves.
If you want to dig deeper into this, I highly recommend reading The Whisperers: Private Life in Stalin's Russia by Orlando Figes. It moves away from the big political names and looks at how regular families tried to survive when everyone was a potential informant. You should also look at the declassified "NKVD Files" that surfaced after 1991, which show the cold, mathematical reality of the execution quotas. Understanding this era requires looking past the propaganda and seeing the calculated machinery of the state at work.
The Great Purge reminds us that power, when unchecked and fueled by conspiracy theories, doesn't just target its enemies—it eventually devours its own creators. It was a period where logic was twisted, and the only way to stay "safe" was to be the most ruthless person in the room. Even then, as Yezhov found out, your time was probably limited.