The glitter is barely settled. Honestly, the smell of industrial-strength hairspray probably still haunts the ballroom at CBS Television City. Every time the host grabs that gold envelope, millions of people hold their breath, ready to riot on social media. It's wild. We’re talking about a ballroom dancing competition, yet the dancing with the stars results trigger the kind of raw, unfiltered passion usually reserved for NFL playoffs or contested elections.
Why? Because it’s never just about the footwork.
If it were just about the technique, the professional ringers would win every single year without fail. But the leaderboard is only half the story. You have the judges—Carrie Ann Inaba, Bruno Tonioli, and Derek Hough—handing out paddles, but then you have the "couch judges" at home. That's where the real chaos happens. The friction between technical merit and fan popularity is what makes the results so unpredictable, and frankly, so frustrating for the purists.
The Math Behind the Madness
People always ask how the winner is actually picked. It’s not a state secret, but it’s definitely weighted in a way that favors the "journey" over the "perfection." Basically, the final score is a 50-50 split. You take the judges’ scores from the night and combine them with the live viewer votes.
Here is the kicker: the percentages matter more than the raw numbers. If a star is at the bottom of the leaderboard but has a massive, dedicated fanbase—think Bindi Irwin or Bobby Bones—they can leapfrog over someone with a perfect 30. It happens constantly.
🔗 Read more: Love Island UK Who Is Still Together: The Reality of Romance After the Villa
Remember Season 27? That was the year the internet basically imploded. Bobby Bones won. He wasn't the best dancer. Not even close. Juan Pablo Di Pace, who was arguably one of the most talented celebrities to ever grace the floor, didn't even make the finale. That specific moment changed how the show handled voting moving forward. They realized that if the "best" dancers keep going home too early, the show loses its competitive integrity. But if the fans don't have a say, they stop tuning in. It’s a delicate, slightly broken balance.
Why Technical Skill Often Loses to "The Journey"
Let's talk about the "ringers." Whenever a Broadway star or a former gymnast joins the cast, the "unfair" accusations start flying before they even put on their shoes. But if you look at the dancing with the stars results over the last decade, being the best on day one is actually a bit of a curse.
Viewers love a transformation. They want to see someone who looks like a baby giraffe on week one turn into a suave tango master by week eight. If you start at a 10, you have nowhere to go. There’s no "arc."
- The Underdog Factor: When someone like Iman Shumpert (Season 30) wins, it’s because he defied expectations. He was a 6'5" NBA player who shouldn't have been able to move like that. His win wasn't just about the scores; it was about the spectacle of his growth.
- The Emotional Connection: A lot of the time, the vote is a sympathy vote or a "relatability" vote. If a star opens up about a personal tragedy during the "Most Memorable Year" week, their vote count usually skyrockets.
- The Pro Power: Never underestimate the pro partners. Fans of Lindsay Arnold, Witney Carson, or Val Chmerkovskiy will vote for whoever they are paired with, regardless of if that celebrity can actually find the beat.
The Judges vs. The Public: A Constant Tug-of-War
Carrie Ann is the "lift police." Bruno is the energetic poet. Derek is the technical technician. They see things we don't. They see the turned-in toes, the missed leads, and the lack of frame. But their scores are often just a suggestion to the public.
💡 You might also like: Gwendoline Butler Dead in a Row: Why This 1957 Mystery Still Packs a Punch
When the judges' scores are tight—say, everyone is getting 9s and 10s—the judges actually lose their power. If the spread between the top and bottom is only three points, the fan vote completely takes over. This is why you’ll sometimes see the judges give a "harsh" score to a fan favorite. They are trying to create a mathematical gap to protect the better dancers from being eliminated. It’s strategic scoring. It’s not always "fair," but it’s how they try to steer the ship.
The Most Controversial Finishes in Show History
You can't discuss the results without mentioning the "snubs."
- Zendaya (Season 16): She was incredible. She lost to Kellie Pickler. People still argue about this in Reddit threads to this day.
- Milo Manheim (Season 27): Another victim of the Bobby Bones landslide. Milo was a powerhouse, but the "Radio Force" was too strong.
- Heather Morris (Season 24): She was a professional dancer for Beyoncé. The public decided she was "too good" and she was booted mid-season in one of the biggest shocks the ballroom has ever seen.
How to Correctly Interpret the Leaderboard
If you're looking at the dancing with the stars results and wondering who is safe, don't just look at the top. Look at the "middle." The dancers in the middle of the pack are usually the ones at the highest risk.
The people at the very bottom get the "pity vote." The people at the very top get the "prestige vote." But the people in the 4th or 5th spot? Their fans often get complacent, assuming they are safe. That’s how you end up with a shock elimination where a frontrunner goes home and the entire audience gasps in unison.
📖 Related: Why ASAP Rocky F kin Problems Still Runs the Club Over a Decade Later
The "Red Room" reactions aren't always staged, either. The pros know the math. They can feel when the momentum is shifting away from them. When you see a pro looking devastated during the results, it’s usually because they saw the writing on the wall based on the previous week's social media engagement.
What This Means for Future Seasons
The show has experimented with different voting windows. They’ve tried "live voting" where you can only vote during the broadcast. This heavily favors the East Coast and Central time zones. If you’re on the West Coast, you’re basically voting blindly based on what you saw the week before or what you’re seeing on social media snippets.
This creates a weird geographical bias in the results. Stars with big fanbases in the South or the Midwest often over-perform because those regions tend to have higher "appointment viewing" habits for reality TV.
Actionable Takeaways for Following the Results
If you want to actually predict who is going to win—or if you're trying to save your favorite—you have to look beyond the sparkles.
- Track Social Media Growth: Check Instagram and TikTok follower counts on Tuesday mornings. The celebrity with the highest percentage of new followers that week is almost never in the bottom two.
- Watch the "Packages": Pay attention to the pre-dance film clips. If the show is giving a celebrity a "villain edit" or making them look lazy, they are likely being set up for an exit. If they are getting a "vulnerable" edit, the producers want them to stay.
- Ignore the "Perfect 10s" Early On: Judges often hand out inflated scores in the semi-finals to ensure a specific four people make it to the finale. It’s called "stacking the deck."
- Vote Early: Because of the live-voting window, you need to have your devices ready the moment the show starts. Don't wait until the end of the episode; by then, the tallies are already being finalized.
The dancing with the stars results are a fascinating study in human psychology. We say we want a fair dance competition, but what we actually want is a good story. We want the underdog to fly, the arrogant star to humbled, and the most likable person to hold the Mirrorball Trophy. As long as the public has 50% of the power, the best dancer will always be at the mercy of the most popular one. That's not a bug in the system; it's the entire point of the show.
To stay ahead of the curve, keep an eye on the internal "power rankings" released by dance analysts who track frame and footwork separately from the "narrative" of the season. Comparing the two will give you the clearest picture of who is actually in danger of going home next.