It started as a desperate "space-filler" for a Sunday edition of the New York World. Honestly, Arthur Wynne, the journalist credited with the first modern grid in December 1913, probably didn't think he was launching a global obsession. He called it a "Word-Cross." It was diamond-shaped. It had no black squares. It was, by all accounts, a bit of a mess compared to what we solve over coffee today.
But people went nuts.
By the 1920s, crossword in the past wasn't just a hobby; it was a full-blown public health crisis according to the era's pundits. Libraries were stripped of dictionaries. Productivity in offices plummeted. The New York Times—the very paper that now defines the gold standard for puzzles—actually spent years mocking the trend. They called it a "sinful waste" of time. They thought it was a fad that would die out like flagpole sitting or goldfish swallowing.
They were wrong.
The Great 1920s Panic Over Word Puzzles
Imagine a world where your local library had to implement a "five-minute rule" for looking up words because people were brawling over reference books. That actually happened. In 1924, the New York Public Library reported a surge in "puzzle-mad" patrons who were hogging dictionaries to the point where "legitimate" students couldn't do their work.
It was total chaos.
The hype peaked when Simon & Schuster—now a publishing giant—launched their entire company on the back of a crossword book. It was their first publication ever. It came with a pencil attached. They sold hundreds of thousands of copies. It was the "Pet Rock" of the 1920s, but with more intellectual vanity.
Critics were brutal. Some doctors claimed that the constant "eye strain" and "mental fatigue" from hunting for a five-letter word for "African antelope" (it’s gnu, always gnu) would lead to a nervous breakdown for the general population. The Times even published an editorial in 1924 titled "An Enslaved Checkered World," lamenting that the puzzle was a "devastating disease."
But the "disease" was profitable.
👉 See also: Finding the University of Arizona Address: It Is Not as Simple as You Think
Why the New York Times Finally Gave In
For decades, the New York Times held out. They viewed crosswords as beneath the dignity of a "serious" newspaper. They sneered at the competition.
Then 1941 happened.
After the attack on Pearl Harbor, the editors realized people needed a distraction. The world was falling apart, and a little bit of controlled, solvable chaos was exactly what the public psyche required. In a memo that changed the paper's history, editor Lester Markel admitted that the puzzle deserved a spot because of the "dreadful" news coming from the front lines.
The first Times crossword appeared in February 1942. It wasn't just a game anymore; it was a morale booster.
The early days of crossword in the past were defined by Margaret Farrar. She was the first puzzle editor at the Times and basically invented the rules we still use. She’s the reason we don’t have two-letter words. She’s the reason the grids are symmetrical. If you rotate a professional crossword 180 degrees, the pattern of black squares stays the same. That was her rule. She wanted elegance, not just a list of definitions.
The Evolution of Cluing: From Dry to Deceptive
In the early days, clues were basically just dictionary definitions.
"A large body of water." (3 letters) -> SEA.
Boring, right?
✨ Don't miss: The Recipe With Boiled Eggs That Actually Makes Breakfast Interesting Again
As the decades rolled on, the "British style" (cryptics) and the "American style" began to diverge. American puzzles stayed focused on the grid-fill but started incorporating puns and "themes." In the 1970s and 80s, the puzzles started getting a bit more playful. You’d see clues that relied on pop culture rather than just Latin names for plants.
Eugene Maleska, who edited the Times puzzle after Farrar, was a bit of a traditionalist—some might say a snob. He loved "crosswordese." These are the words that nobody uses in real life but are essential for puzzle construction because they are vowel-heavy.
- Akee (a Caribbean fruit)
- Epee (a fencing sword)
- Erne (a sea eagle)
- Etui (a small needle case)
If you solved a crossword in the past during the Maleska era, you had to know your 18th-century botany and obscure geography. It was a test of rote memorization.
Then came Will Shortz in 1993.
Shortz revolutionized the game by prioritizing "cleverness" over "obscurity." He wanted clues that made you go "Aha!" instead of "What the heck is that?" He brought in slang, brand names, and tricky wordplay. Suddenly, a clue like "Lead singer?" might lead to CHORISTER, or it might lead to PENCIL. That shift saved the medium from becoming a relic of the Greatest Generation.
The Weirdest Moments in Crossword History
People take these grids way too seriously.
In 1944, just before D-Day, the British MI5 went into a full-blown panic. A series of crosswords in The Daily Telegraph featured answers that were secret code names for the Allied invasion.
- Overlord (The operation name)
- Neptune (The naval phase)
- Utah and Omaha (The landing beaches)
The authorities interrogated the creator, a schoolteacher named Leonard Dawe. They thought he was a spy. Turns out? He just heard the words from soldiers hanging around the school and thought they sounded like "good words for a puzzle." Total coincidence. Almost blew the biggest military operation in history.
🔗 Read more: Finding the Right Words: Quotes About Sons That Actually Mean Something
Then there was the 1996 "Clinton or Dole" puzzle.
On the day of the U.S. Presidential election, the New York Times published a puzzle where the headline clue was "Lead story in tomorrow's newspaper." The answer appeared to be CLINTON ELECTED. But, if you changed just a few letters, the exact same grid worked for BOB DOLE ELECTED.
It was a masterpiece of construction. It showed that the crossword in the past wasn't just a static thing—it could be a living, breathing part of the cultural conversation.
Why We Still Care
We live in a world of algorithmic feeds and 5-second videos. Crosswords are the opposite of that. They require "deep work." You can't really multitask a Saturday Times puzzle.
There is also a psychological element called the "Zeigarnik Effect." It’s the tendency to remember uncompleted tasks better than completed ones. That’s why an unsolved corner of a crossword will itch at your brain all day until you finally realize that "Small hopper" isn't a rabbit, it's a POGO STICK.
Honestly, the crossword in the past was a gateway to the gamification of language. Without Arthur Wynne’s diamond grid, we probably wouldn't have Wordle, Spelling Bee, or any of the digital word games that dominate our phones today.
How to Level Up Your Solving Skills
If you're tired of getting stuck on a Tuesday or Wednesday, you need to change how you look at the page. Most people read a clue and try to answer it. That's a mistake. You should be looking for the type of answer required.
- Check the tense. If the clue is "Jumped," the answer must end in -ED (usually). If the clue is "Jumping," look for -ING.
- Look for the "?" at the end. A question mark means wordplay is afoot. If the clue is "Flower?" it’s probably not a rose or a tulip. It’s likely something that "flows," like a RIVER.
- Fill in the "crosswordese" first. Even though modern editors try to avoid them, you’ll still see OREO, ALOE, and AREA everywhere because they help connect the harder words.
- Trust your gut on the themes. Every Thursday Times puzzle has a "gimmick." Sometimes the answers go backward. Sometimes they skip squares. If the grid feels "broken," you've probably found the trick.
The best way to honor the legacy of the crossword in the past is to stop treating it like a test you have to pass. It’s a conversation between you and the constructor. They are trying to trick you; your job is to catch them.
Start by digging into archives. Many digital subscriptions allow you to play puzzles from the 90s and early 2000s. You’ll notice how much the "vibe" of language has changed. You’ll see the shift from formal definitions to the snarky, pun-heavy style we love today. Grab a pencil—or a tablet—and just start filling in what you know. The rest usually reveals itself in the crossings.