You think you’re in control. Most of us do. We wake up, grab a coffee, and assume the decisions we make—from which stocks to buy to whether that third taco is a good idea—are based on cold, hard logic. But science and human behavior tell a much messier story. Your brain isn’t a sleek supercomputer; it’s a "kluge." That’s a term psychologists like Gary Marcus use to describe a clumsy, makeshift solution to a problem. Basically, our brains are evolved hardware running outdated software that’s prone to glitching in the modern world.
These glitches are what we call cognitive biases.
They aren't just "quirks." They are deeply embedded patterns that dictate how you see the world, and they’re often the reason we make spectacularly bad choices. If you've ever held onto a losing investment because you "didn't want to admit defeat," or if you've ever bought something just because it was on sale—even though you didn't need it—you’ve been a victim of your own biology.
The Science and Human Behavior Behind Why We Can't Let Go
Let’s talk about the Sunk Cost Fallacy. It’s one of the most destructive forces in human decision-making.
At its core, this bias makes us continue an endeavor—a relationship, a job, a project—once an investment in money, effort, or time has been made. It’s the reason people stay in miserable marriages for twenty years. "I've already put so much time into this," they say. From a purely logical standpoint, the time you spent is gone. It's a "sunk cost." The only thing that should matter is whether the future will be better if you stay or leave. But our brains hate loss. We are "loss averse."
Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky, the grandfathers of behavioral economics, proved this with their work on Prospect Theory. They found that the pain of losing $100 is twice as powerful as the joy of gaining $100. Because we fear that "loss" of the time or money we already spent, we keep digging the hole deeper. It's irrational. It's human. It's why billion-dollar government projects like the Concorde supersonic jet kept getting funded long after everyone knew they were financial disasters.
We See What We Want to See (Literally)
Confirmation bias is the big one. You’ve probably heard of it, but you likely underestimate how much it's currently warping your reality.
This isn't just about ignoring facts you don't like. It’s about how your brain filters information before you're even consciously aware of it. In a 2004 study at Emory University, researchers used fMRI machines to track the brains of "committed" Democrats and Republicans during the US Presidential election. When participants were shown information that contradicted their preferred candidate, the parts of the brain responsible for reasoning basically shut down. Meanwhile, the circuits involved in emotional regulation lit up.
Your brain literally protects your ego by filtering out the truth.
It feels good to be right. It feels physically painful to be wrong. So, we seek out the news sites that agree with us. We follow people on social media who parrot our own opinions. We become trapped in an echo chamber of our own making, and the scary part is, we think we're being "objective" the whole time.
Why Your "Gut Feeling" Is Often Wrong
We love to romanticize intuition. We're told to "trust our gut."
But science and human behavior research suggests your gut is frequently a liar, especially in complex environments. This brings us to the distinction between System 1 and System 2 thinking. System 1 is fast, instinctive, and emotional. System 2 is slower, more deliberative, and logical.
When you’re walking through a dark alley and hear a noise, System 1 is great. It keeps you alive. But when you’re trying to evaluate a complex medical diagnosis or a multi-year business strategy, System 1 is a disaster. It relies on "heuristics"—mental shortcuts.
- The Availability Heuristic: You think shark attacks are more common than they are because they make for vivid news stories. You’re actually more likely to be killed by a falling coconut, but your brain can’t "see" a coconut death as easily as a Great White.
- The Anchoring Effect: Ever notice how the "original price" is always crossed out next to the "sale price"? That first number is an anchor. Your brain latches onto it, making the second number seem like a deal, even if it’s still overpriced.
- The Dunning-Kruger Effect: This is the one where people with the least amount of knowledge in a subject tend to be the most confident in their abilities. They don't know enough to know what they don't know.
Social Proof: The Survival Instinct That Makes Us Follow the Herd
Why did everyone buy Stanley cups last year? Why do we look at Yelp reviews before entering a restaurant?
Social proof.
Back on the savannah, if you saw your entire tribe start running in one direction, you didn't stop to ask, "Excuse me, what seems to be the trouble?" You ran. If you didn't, you got eaten by a saber-toothed tiger. The people who followed the herd survived and passed on their genes.
Today, that same instinct makes us do stupid things. It drives market bubbles. It drives "cancel culture." It’s why we feel a strange pressure to agree with the group in a meeting, even when we know the group is headed for a cliff. Psychologist Solomon Asch proved this in the 1950s with his famous line experiments. He showed that people would knowingly give a wrong answer just to fit in with a group of strangers.
We aren't as independent as we like to think. We are social animals, and the fear of social exclusion is, for our brains, nearly identical to physical pain.
The Nuance of Human Nature
It's tempting to look at all this and think humans are just broken. But these biases exist for a reason. They are "efficient." If we had to use System 2 logic for every single decision—like which brand of toothpaste to buy—we’d be paralyzed. We’d never get out of the bathroom.
The goal isn't to delete these biases. You can't. The goal is to build "choice architecture" that accounts for them.
🔗 Read more: Samaritan Pacific Communities Hospital: What You Need to Know Before Heading to the Coast
Richard Thaler, another Nobel Prize winner, calls this "Nudging." If you want people to save more for retirement, don't just tell them to do it. Make the "opt-in" the default. Because we’re lazy (a bias called Status Quo Bias), most people will just stay in the plan. It’s using our natural behavioral flaws to create a better outcome.
How to Actually Fight Your Own Brain
So, what do you do with this? Knowing about science and human behavior is only half the battle. You have to actively intervene in your own thought processes.
First, slow down. When you feel a surge of certainty or a rush of anger, that's System 1 taking the wheel. Stop. Count to ten. Force yourself to find three reasons why you might be wrong. This is called "red teaming" your own ideas.
Second, change your environment. If you know you're prone to impulse buying, take your credit card off your phone. If you're trying to eat better, don't keep junk food in the house. Your "willpower" is a finite resource, and it's much weaker than your environment.
Third, seek out dissent. If you’re a die-hard fan of a certain political ideology, go read the most intelligent version of the opposing view. Not the "crazy" version that's easy to mock, but the one that actually makes sense. It’s uncomfortable. It feels like your brain is itching. That itch is the feeling of confirmation bias being challenged.
Actionable Steps for Better Decision Making
Stop trying to be "smarter" and start being more systematic.
- Conduct a "Pre-Mortem": Before starting a big project, imagine it has failed one year from now. Now, work backward. Why did it fail? This bypasses the "overconfidence bias" and lets you see risks you were ignoring.
- The 10-10-10 Rule: When facing a tough emotional choice, ask yourself: How will I feel about this in 10 minutes? 10 months? 10 years? This forces your brain to shift from System 1 (immediate emotion) to System 2 (long-term perspective).
- Audit Your Information Diet: Actively track where you get your news. If every source agrees with you, you're not informed; you're validated. Find one source that challenges your worldview and read it weekly.
- Sleep on Big Decisions: This sounds like cliché advice from your grandma, but it's neurochemically sound. Sleep helps the brain process emotional data and integrate it with long-term memory, reducing the "affect heuristic" (making decisions based on current mood).
- Write it Down: When you make a big decision, write down exactly why you’re doing it and what you expect to happen. This prevents "Hindsight Bias"—the tendency to look back and say "I knew it all along" when things go wrong (or right).
Understanding the science and human behavior that drives your daily life isn't about becoming a robot. It's about becoming a more aware human. You’re going to be biased. You’re going to be irrational. But once you know where the trapdoors are, you’re much less likely to fall through them.