He was the pride of Ssangmun-dong. That’s how everyone described him. When you think about Cho Sang-woo from Squid Game, you aren't just thinking about a guy in a green tracksuit; you’re looking at the crushing weight of high expectations gone wrong. He didn't start as a monster. He started as a genius who graduated from Seoul National University. He was the local kid who "made it." But by the time he stepped onto that island, the prestige was gone. All that was left was a desperate man with 6 billion won in debt and a willingness to do literally anything to avoid going home a failure.
It’s easy to hate him. Honestly, after what he did to Ali in the marbles game, most of the internet wanted his head on a pike. But if we’re being real, Sang-woo is the most terrifying character in the show because he represents the logical extreme of our own survival instincts. He isn't a psychopath like Deok-su. He’s a calculator.
The SNU Legend and the Reality of Financial Ruin
Most viewers forget that Sang-woo wasn't just "broke." He was "stole-money-from-clients-and-lost-it-on-the-futures-market" broke. In South Korean society, the pressure to succeed is immense. Graduating from SNU (Seoul National University) is like getting a golden ticket to the elite class. When Sang-woo failed, he didn't just lose money. He lost his identity. This is a crucial detail for understanding Cho Sang-woo in Squid Game. He couldn't face his mother because his entire existence was built on being the "successful son."
He’s the foil to Seong Gi-hun. While Gi-hun is impulsive and emotional, Sang-woo is cold. He looks at the games like a series of math problems. In "Red Light, Green Light," he’s the first one to realize the mechanics of the movement sensor. He stays behind others to use them as shields. It’s smart. It’s also predatory.
The brilliance of the writing lies in how his pragmatism slowly curdles into pure evil. Think back to the honeycomb game. He knew exactly what the game was because of his childhood memories, yet he let Gi-hun pick the umbrella. He didn't do it because he hated Gi-hun. He did it because fewer players meant a higher prize pool. It was a business decision.
That Marbles Scene: Why We Can't Forgive Him
Let's talk about Episode 6. "Gganbu." It’s widely considered one of the most heartbreaking hours of television ever produced. And it’s the moment Sang-woo cemented himself as the series' true antagonist.
📖 Related: Al Pacino Angels in America: Why His Roy Cohn Still Terrifies Us
Ali Abdul was the heart of the show. He was kind, loyal, and he looked up to Sang-woo like an older brother. When Sang-woo realized he was losing the marble game, he didn't just give up. He used Ali’s greatest strength—his trust—against him. He didn't just steal the marbles; he orchestrated a lie about a "partnership" that led Ali to his death while thinking he was safe.
It was a betrayal of the highest order.
What makes it worse is that Sang-woo cried afterward. He wasn't enjoying it. He hated that he had to do it, but his desire to live and win outweighed his soul. This is the "sunk cost fallacy" in human form. He had already sacrificed so much that stopping now would make all the previous deaths meaningless. In his head, he had to win to justify the blood on his hands.
The Glass Bridge and the Final Descent
By the time the players reached the glass bridge, Sang-woo had completely abandoned the facade of "teamwork." When he pushed the glassmaker to his death in the final seconds of the game, he didn't hesitate.
"He was going to run out the clock," Sang-woo argued.
👉 See also: Adam Scott in Step Brothers: Why Derek is Still the Funniest Part of the Movie
Technically? He was right. If he hadn't pushed that man, they all might have died. But that’s the trap of the character. He uses logic to mask his lack of empathy. He justifies murder as "efficiency."
- He killed Sae-byeok while she was dying.
- He betrayed the only friend who actually cared about him.
- He viewed the elderly and the weak as liabilities rather than people.
His evolution is a straight line from "strategic leader" to "cold-blooded executioner." By the final duel in the rain, he isn't even fighting for the money anymore. He’s fighting to prove that his way of living—survival of the fittest—is the only way that works.
Comparing Sang-woo to Gi-hun: Two Sides of the Same Coin
The final fight between Gi-hun and Sang-woo is the philosophical climax of the series. Gi-hun represents the belief that humanity still exists even in a hellscape. Sang-woo represents the belief that humanity is a luxury the poor cannot afford.
Interestingly, Sang-woo’s final act is his only moment of redemption, though it's a dark one. By taking his own life, he ensures that Gi-hun wins the money. He knows he can’t go back to his old life. He knows he’s a murderer. In those final seconds, he asks Gi-hun to take care of his mother. It’s the only time we see the "Ssangmun-dong prodigy" again—the boy who cared about his family.
It doesn't erase the things he did. But it makes him human.
✨ Don't miss: Actor Most Academy Awards: The Record Nobody Is Breaking Anytime Soon
Actionable Insights: What We Can Learn from the Fall of Cho Sang-woo
While we aren't playing games for millions of dollars, the psychological pitfalls Sang-woo fell into are very real in our world.
Watch out for the Sunk Cost Fallacy
Sang-woo felt he couldn't stop because he’d already "paid" too much in blood and guilt. In real life, people stay in toxic jobs or bad investments for the same reason. Know when to walk away, even if you’ve already lost a lot.
Pressure and the "Prestige Trap"
The need to maintain an image of success destroyed Sang-woo before the games even started. If he had been honest with his mother about his failures, he might never have stepped onto that boat. Authenticity is a safety net.
Logic without Empathy is Dangerous
Being "right" or "logical" isn't the same as being good. Sang-woo was right about the glass bridge, but he lost his humanity in the process. In leadership and life, the "efficient" choice is often the most damaging one in the long run.
The legacy of Cho Sang-woo in Squid Game isn't just that he was a villain. It’s that he was a warning. He is what happens when a society values success over people, and when a person values their ego over their soul.
To truly understand the impact of his character, one should re-watch the series focusing specifically on his eyes during the transition between the games. The light leaves them. By the end, he is a ghost in a suit, a shell of the man who was once the pride of his neighborhood.
If you are looking to understand the deeper social commentary of the show, start by analyzing the debt crisis in South Korea. The real-world statistics regarding household debt in Seoul provide a haunting backdrop to Sang-woo’s fictional desperation. He wasn't just a character; he was a mirror.