History is usually gray. We see the past through a dusty lens of monochromatic film that makes everyone look like a ghost or a statue. But when you look at Che Guevara in color, something shifts in the brain. He stops being a stencil on a t-shirt or a dorm room poster and suddenly becomes a guy. A real, breathing person with sun-damaged skin, messy hair, and tobacco stains on his fingers. It’s jarring.
Honestly, colorizing history is controversial for a reason. Purists hate it. They think it messes with the "soul" of the original shot. But for most of us, seeing the vibrant olive drab of his fatigue jacket or the specific, tired hazel of his eyes makes the Cuban Revolution feel less like a textbook chapter and more like a live broadcast. You start to notice things. The grime under the fingernails. The way the humidity in the Sierra Maestra made his asthma worse. The actual, vivid red of the blood on his hands.
The Viral Power of Che Guevara in Color
Most people know the Guerrillero Heroico—that famous shot by Alberto Korda. It’s arguably the most reproduced image in the history of photography. But Korda shot that in high-contrast black and white. It’s graphic. It’s easy to print on a mug. When you see Che Guevara in color, specifically the photos taken during his final days in Bolivia or his 1964 trip to the United Nations, the myth starts to peel away.
Color adds a layer of accountability. In black and white, a jungle is just shades of gray. In color, you see the grueling, suffocating green of the Bolivian terrain where he eventually met his end. You see the pale, sickly complexion he had toward the end, a result of chronic illness and starvation.
Why our brains react differently to colorized history
Neuroscience actually backs this up. Our brains process color information in the visual cortex much faster than we process shapes or contrast alone. When we see a "real-life" palette, our empathy centers light up. We recognize the subject as a member of our species rather than a historical relic. Seeing Che Guevara in color forces a confrontation with his humanity—both the charismatic leader and the cold-blooded executioner at La Cabaña. You can't hide behind the "artistic" distance of grayscale anymore.
Behind the Lens: Who actually shot the color?
Not all color shots of Guevara are modern "colorizations." Some were genuine color film, which was expensive and rare for revolutionary movements in the late 50s and early 60s.
- René Burri, the famous Magnum photographer, took some of the most iconic color images of Che in 1963. He caught him in his office in Havana, chomping on a cigar, looking intensely at something off-camera. The blue of the smoke against the brown of the cigar is vivid. It’s tactile.
- Andrew St. George, a journalist who spent time with the rebels in the mountains, also captured early glimpses of the movement.
- Later, during his "diplomatic" phase, European photographers captured him in crisp suits—a weird departure from the "rebel" look—where the color highlights his surprisingly fair complexion, a nod to his Irish and Spanish ancestry.
It's kinda wild to think about. We think of the 60s as this technicolor explosion because of the Beatles and Woodstock, but the political world often stayed in black and white in our collective memory. Seeing him in full color bridges that gap.
The controversy of the "Cool" aesthetic
There is a dark side to this. By making Che Guevara in color look so modern and "HD," we risk turning a violent political figure into a lifestyle brand. This is the "merchandising of revolution." When a photo looks like it could have been taken yesterday on an iPhone, it’s easier to sell it as a "vibe."
But if you look closely at the colorized footage of his trial or his speeches, the vibe isn't always "cool." It’s intense. It’s often scary. You see the sweat. You see the zealotry. Critics of Guevara, including many in the Cuban-American exile community, argue that colorization often sanitizes the brutality of his regime by making him look like a movie star. They aren't wrong. A colorized photo of a handsome man is a powerful propaganda tool, whether intentional or not.
💡 You might also like: Face Framing Layers Bangs: Why Your Stylist Might Be Hesitant (and How to Get Them Right)
The Bolivia Photos: A Grim Reality
The most haunting use of color is in the photos taken of his body after his execution in La Higuera, Bolivia, in 1967. The Bolivian army wanted to prove he was dead. They laid him out on a laundry sink. The color photos from that day are gruesome. The stark contrast of his open eyes against the pale skin—it looks like a Renaissance painting. Seeing those images in color removes the "legend" status and shows the brutal, messy end of a man who lived by the sword.
How to find authentic color versions
If you’re looking for these images, you have to be careful. The internet is flooded with bad AI colorizations that make everyone look like they have a fake tan.
- Look for Magnum Photos archives. René Burri’s work is the gold standard.
- Check the National Archives of Cuba. They have recently begun digitizing original color slides from the early 60s.
- Verify the source. If the colors look too "neon," it’s a modern hack job. Real 60s color film (like Kodachrome) has a specific, warm, slightly grainy feel.
What this means for how we see history
We’re entering an era where black and white will eventually feel "fake" to younger generations. If we want history to remain relevant, we have to see it in the spectrum we live in. Seeing Che Guevara in color isn't just about aesthetics. It’s about stripping away the layers of time.
It forces us to ask: If this guy was standing in the room with me today, in his green fatigues and his black beret, would I be inspired or terrified? Color doesn't give you the answer, but it gives you better data to decide for yourself.
Moving forward with historical media
To truly understand the impact of these visuals, you need to look past the "cool" factor. Start by comparing a colorized image of Guevara at the UN with the actual transcript of his speech. Notice how the visual "softness" of color film interacts with the hardness of his rhetoric.
Search for the work of René Burri specifically. His 1963 contact sheets show the "in-between" moments—the moments where Che wasn't posing, where he looked tired, or bored, or angry. That is where the real history lives. Don't just settle for the posters. Look for the skin tones, the rust on the trucks, and the real shades of the Cuban sky. That's how you break the spell of the icon and see the man.
Practical Steps for Evaluating Historical Imagery:
- Cross-reference with primary texts: A photo of Che smiling in color hits differently when read alongside his "Message to the Tricontinental."
- Audit the "Colorist": If viewing a modern colorization, find the artist’s name (like Marina Amaral). Expert colorists research the exact dye of the uniforms and the weather on the day the photo was taken to ensure accuracy.
- Analyze the "Why": Ask why a specific photo was colorized. Was it to humanize, to demonize, or to sell a product? The intent often changes the palette.