If you were looking for help with developmental disabilities in the mid-eighties, you probably hit a wall. Hard. By the time 1986 rolled around, the landscape of social services in the United States was undergoing a massive, painful, and necessary transformation. We call it deinstitutionalization. It sounds like a dry, academic term, but for the families involved, it was a revolution. At the heart of this shift was a small but vital organization that became a lifeline for many: Brothers Home in 1986.
Living through that era meant watching the old "asylum" model crumble. People were tired of seeing their loved ones tucked away in cold, state-run facilities like Willowbrook, which had been exposed as a nightmare only a decade prior.
Families wanted something better. They wanted a front porch. A kitchen table. A sense of belonging.
What Brothers Home in 1986 represented for the community
It wasn't just a building. When we talk about Brothers Home in 1986, we’re talking about the Brothers of Charity, an international religious organization with deep roots in social work and healthcare. They weren't new to the game, but 1986 was a pivotal year for their American operations, particularly in places like Pennsylvania and the surrounding regions.
They were pushing the "group home" concept before it was cool.
Back then, "community-based living" was a radical idea to many neighbors. People were scared. There was a lot of Not-In-My-Back-Yard (NIMBY) energy. But Brothers Home pushed through that. They provided a residential setting for men with intellectual and developmental disabilities that actually looked like... well, a home.
The philosophy was simple: Every human being has a right to dignity.
In 1986, this meant moving away from the "medical model"—where people were treated like patients to be cured—and moving toward the "social model." You weren't a patient. You were a resident. You had chores. You had a roommate. You had a life.
The struggle for funding in a Reagan-era economy
Honestly, 1986 was a weird time for social services. We were deep into the Reagan administration, and the federal government was busy "block-granting" everything. This basically meant the feds would hand a chunk of money to the states and say, "Good luck, figure it out."
For organizations like the Brothers of Charity, this created a constant scramble.
They weren't just caregivers; they had to be amateur lobbyists. They were fighting for Medicaid waivers. They were trying to prove that it was actually cheaper to house someone in a community setting than in a massive state institution.
💡 You might also like: Easy recipes dinner for two: Why you are probably overcomplicating date night
And they were right.
But the paperwork? It was a nightmare. If you look at the records from that era, you see a constant back-and-forth between private non-profits and state regulators. The standards were being written as they went along. How many staff members do you need for three residents? What kind of fire suppression system is mandatory for a residential house? These are the questions that defined Brothers Home in 1986.
Why 1986 was the breaking point for institutions
To understand why this specific year matters, you have to look at the legislative tailwinds. The Developmental Disabilities Assistance and Bill of Rights Act had been around for a while, but by the mid-80s, the courts were finally growing teeth.
Judges were looking at state-run warehouses and saying, "No more."
- Pennhurst State School and Hospital in Pennsylvania had recently closed its doors.
- The Halderman v. Pennhurst case had set a massive legal precedent for the "right to habilitation" in the least restrictive environment.
- Advocacy groups like The Arc were gaining massive political influence.
Brothers Home in 1986 was the practical solution to a legal mandate. When the states were ordered to move people out of institutions, they didn't have anywhere to put them. They turned to the Brothers.
They turned to the private sector to do what the government had failed to do for a century: provide a soul.
The day-to-day reality inside a 1980s group home
It wasn't all sunshine and rainbows. Let's be real.
Running a home for people with complex needs is exhausting. In 1986, the staff at Brothers Home weren't just employees; they were often young, idealistic people working for very little pay. They were doing the heavy lifting of social integration.
Imagine taking a group of men who had spent twenty years in a silent ward and taking them to a local diner.
The stares. The awkwardness. The triumph of ordering a burger and fries for the first time.
📖 Related: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
These are the small victories that never make it into the history books. But they are the reason why the group home model survived. It worked. People who were once considered "unmanageable" were suddenly flourishing because they had a routine and a sense of agency.
A shift in specialized care
One of the things Brothers Home in 1986 did exceptionally well was addressing the "dual diagnosis" problem. This is when someone has both an intellectual disability and a mental health issue.
Most places in the 80s would just medicate these people into a stupor.
The Brothers tried a different path. They focused on behavioral interventions. They looked at the environment. Is the room too loud? Is the routine too rigid? By tweaking the "home" part of the Brothers Home, they managed to reduce the need for heavy-duty antipsychotics in many of their residents.
It was pioneering work, even if they didn't call it that at the time.
The legacy that sticks with us today
If you look at the modern landscape of the Brothers of Charity Services, you see the DNA of 1986 everywhere. The focus has shifted toward even more independence—supported living where people have their own apartments—but the core mission remains.
We owe a lot to that specific era.
If those early group homes had failed—if they had been centers of abuse or financial ruin—the "deinstitutionalization" movement might have stalled. We might have gone back to the old ways.
Brothers Home in 1986 proved that the community model wasn't just a pipe dream. It was a viable, humane, and sustainable way to treat our fellow citizens.
Common misconceptions about the 1986 era
A lot of people think that once the big institutions closed, everyone lived happily ever after. That’s just not true. The "homelessness" crisis of the late 80s was partly fueled by the fact that many people were released from state hospitals without a safety net like Brothers Home.
👉 See also: Curtain Bangs on Fine Hair: Why Yours Probably Look Flat and How to Fix It
The Brothers were the exception, not the rule.
Many people ended up on the streets or in the criminal justice system because there weren't enough beds in community homes. 1986 was a year of great progress, but also a year of great abandonment for those who couldn't find a spot in a reputable program.
Also, the "religious" aspect of the Brothers of Charity often gets misunderstood. While they were a Catholic organization, the 1986 houses were focused on service, not proselytizing. They took everyone. They served everyone.
Actionable steps for families navigating modern care
If you are currently looking for residential support for a family member, the lessons from 1986 still apply. The "vibe" of a home matters as much as the clinical credentials.
1. Check the turnover rate. In 1986, the best homes had staff that stayed for years. Today, the industry is struggling with a staffing crisis. If a home has a revolving door of caregivers, the quality of care will suffer, regardless of how nice the building looks.
2. Ask about community integration. Is the house just a "mini-institution"? Do the residents actually go out? Do they have jobs? Do they have friends outside of the house? A real "home" isn't a locked box.
3. Verify the accreditation. Back in the day, things were a bit "Wild West." Now, we have organizations like CARF (Commission on Accreditation of Rehabilitation Facilities). Ensure any home you consider is meeting high national standards.
4. Trust your gut on the atmosphere. When you walk into a house like the ones run by the Brothers, it should smell like a home. It should sound like a home. If it feels like a hospital, it’s probably not the right place for long-term living.
The history of Brothers Home in 1986 is a reminder that social progress isn't an accident. It's the result of people deciding that the status quo is unacceptable and building something better, one brick and one bedroom at a time. We’ve come a long way since the eighties, but the fundamental need for a place to belong hasn't changed one bit.
To move forward in the current landscape of disability rights, we have to look at the stability and community-first approach that organizations like the Brothers pioneered decades ago.
Start by researching the "HCBS Settings Rule" in your state. This is the modern evolution of the 1986 movement, ensuring that anyone receiving federal funding for home-based services is truly integrated into their community. If a provider isn't meeting those standards, look elsewhere. Your family member deserves a home, not just a bed.