It was supposed to be eight days. Just eight days. Suni Williams and Butch Wilmore climbed into the Boeing Starliner capsule on June 5, 2024, expecting a quick "taxi ride" to the International Space Station (ISS) and a celebratory splashdown shortly after. Instead, they’ve spent months watching the Earth rotate from 250 miles up, while engineers on the ground argued over whether their ride home was a deathtrap or just "finicky."
If you’re asking why are the astronauts stuck in space, you aren't alone. It’s been the biggest headline in aerospace for a reason. This isn't a movie plot; it’s a messy, expensive, and deeply technical failure of a multi-billion dollar project that was meant to give NASA a second way to get people off the planet.
Space is hard. We hear that a lot. But this specific situation is a mix of helium leaks, "cooked" thruster seals, and a massive dose of corporate caution.
The Hardware Headache: What Actually Broke?
The trouble started before the wheels—or rather, the rockets—even left the pad. There was a known helium leak. NASA and Boeing decided it was "manageable." But as Starliner approached the ISS, four more leaks popped up. Then, the thrusters started acting weird.
Imagine driving a car where the power steering randomly cuts out while you're trying to parallel park. That’s basically what happened to Butch and Suni. Five of the 28 reaction control system (RCS) thrusters failed during the docking sequence. While they managed to dock manually, the "why" behind the failure became a nightmare for NASA’s Commercial Crew Program.
NASA’s Steve Stich and Boeing’s Mark Nappi spent weeks looking at data from testing at the White Sands Test Facility in New Mexico. What they found was a bit scary. They discovered that a small Teflon seal inside the thrusters was heating up, swelling, and physically blocking the flow of propellant. This is "vapor lock," and in the vacuum of space, it’s a recipe for disaster. If those thrusters failed during the critical deorbit burn, the astronauts wouldn't just be late for dinner—they’d be in a vehicle they couldn't control.
Why Couldn't They Just Use the Starliner Anyway?
This is where things get tense. Boeing insisted the ship was safe. They pointed to the ground tests. They argued that even with some failed thrusters, the redundancy was enough.
👉 See also: How to Log Off Gmail: The Simple Fixes for Your Privacy Panic
NASA disagreed.
The memory of the Challenger and Columbia disasters hangs heavy over every meeting at Johnson Space Center. There was a fundamental disagreement between the engineers who built the craft and the agency responsible for the lives of the crew. NASA eventually decided the risk was "unacceptable."
It’s a huge blow to Boeing’s reputation. Especially since SpaceX, their primary rival, has been flying crews back and forth like a bus service since 2020.
The SpaceX Rescue Plan
Because Starliner was deemed too risky for a crewed return, it flew back to Earth empty in September 2024. It landed perfectly in New Mexico, which was bittersweet. It proved the ship could make it, but it didn't change the fact that NASA didn't know it would make it.
So, how do they get home?
Enter the Crew-9 mission. In late September, a SpaceX Dragon capsule launched with two empty seats. This was the "lifeboat" plan. Butch and Suni were officially integrated into the ISS Expedition 71/72 crew. They aren't just guests anymore; they are full-time station residents.
✨ Don't miss: Calculating Age From DOB: Why Your Math Is Probably Wrong
They are now scheduled to come home in February 2025.
Think about that for a second. An eight-day mission turned into an eight-month stay. They didn't pack for eight months. They didn't say goodbye to their families for eight months. They are living in clothes delivered by cargo ships and eating space food way longer than they ever intended.
Life on the ISS: It’s Not a Vacation
People think being "stuck" in space sounds cool. It’s not. The ISS is about the size of a six-bedroom house, but it’s cramped, loud, and smells like a mix of ozone and burnt steak.
Butch and Suni are professionals. They’ve been doing science experiments, maintaining the station's plumbing (which breaks more often than you’d think), and exercising two hours a day to keep their bones from turning into Swiss cheese. Without gravity, your body decides it doesn't need a skeleton anymore. You lose bone density and muscle mass at an alarming rate.
There's also the radiation. Every day they stay up there, they are soaking up cosmic rays that we are protected from on Earth by our atmosphere. It’s a calculated risk, but a long stay increases the lifetime risk of cancer.
The Bigger Picture for Boeing and NASA
The reason why are the astronauts stuck in space matters so much is because of the "Commercial Crew" contract. NASA gave Boeing $4.2 billion and SpaceX $2.6 billion back in 2014 to build these ships.
🔗 Read more: Installing a Push Button Start Kit: What You Need to Know Before Tearing Your Dash Apart
Boeing is years behind. They’ve already taken over $1.5 billion in losses on the Starliner program. Every month those astronauts stay up there is a reminder that the "legacy" aerospace giant is being outperformed by Elon Musk’s company. It raises serious questions about the future of Starliner. Will it ever fly again? NASA says they want a second provider for redundancy, but at what point do you stop throwing good money after bad?
The Mental Toll of a Mission Creep
Honestly, the psychological part is what gets me. These astronauts are incredibly disciplined, but "mission creep" is a real thing. You mentalize a week of intense work and then you're told it's actually half a year.
Suni Williams is a veteran. She’s been in space for over 320 days across her career. She’s tough. But missing birthdays, holidays, and the simple feeling of wind on your face or the smell of rain—that weighs on a person. They are "stuck" because the physics of orbital mechanics and the bureaucracy of safety protocols demanded it.
What Happens Next?
The plan is now set in stone. Here is the reality for the crew:
- February 2025 Return: They will board the SpaceX Dragon with the Crew-9 members.
- Physical Therapy: When they land, they will likely need weeks of rehab to walk normally again.
- Starliner Overhaul: Boeing has to go back to the drawing board on those thrusters. They have to prove to NASA—with data, not just promises—that the swelling seal issue is fixed.
The "stuck" narrative is technically true, but NASA prefers the term "extended mission." Whatever you call it, it’s a landmark moment in space history. It shows that even in 2024 and 2025, space remains an unforgiving environment where a tiny piece of plastic—a seal the size of a coin—can derail a billion-dollar mission and leave two humans circling the globe for months on end.
If you're following this story, keep an eye on the February 2025 landing window. That's the finish line. Until then, Butch and Suni will keep working, keep exercising, and keep looking out the window at a home they can't reach just yet.
To understand the full scope of the technical failures, you should look into the Integrated Test Sequencing reports that NASA released. They detail the exact temperatures at which the Teflon seals began to degrade. Also, keep track of the SpaceX Crew-10 schedule; any delays there could potentially push the return of the "stuck" astronauts even further back, though that is currently unlikely. Monitoring the official NASA blogs for "Station Updates" is the most reliable way to see if their return remains on track for early 2025.