Spatial computing. It's a phrase Apple tried to force into our collective vocabulary like a parent insisting their kid use a fork instead of their hands. Honestly, it didn't quite stick at first. When the original Vision Pro launched at $3,499, it felt less like a product and more like a high-stakes science experiment strapped to your face. But as we look toward the Apple Vision Pro 2, the conversation is shifting from "who would buy this?" to "how does this actually become a part of my life?"
The tech world is currently obsessed with AI, but hardware still dictates how we interface with that intelligence. The first generation was heavy. It was expensive. It had a battery pack that dangled like a weird umbilical cord. Yet, if you’ve actually spent three hours working inside the "Mount Hood" environment, you know the magic isn't a lie. It’s just trapped in a body that isn't ready for prime time yet. That is why the Apple Vision Pro 2 is perhaps the most scrutinized piece of hardware in Cupertino's pipeline right now.
The Weight Problem Everyone Is Complaining About
Let’s be real: wearing the current Vision Pro feels like having a small, very expensive brick strapped to your forehead. It weighs between 600 and 650 grams. For context, that’s more than an 11-inch iPad Pro. If you wear it for more than an hour, your neck starts to remind you that humans weren't evolved to balance magnesium and glass on their noses.
💡 You might also like: Exactly How Many Pilots in a B-2 Spirit? The Real Cockpit Setup
Apple knows this. Inside the halls of Apple Park, the directive for Apple Vision Pro 2 is reportedly focused on a "slimming down" phase. We aren't just talking about a few grams. Supply chain whispers from analysts like Ming-Chi Kuo suggest a fundamental redesign of the headband and the internal cooling system. They need to get that weight down by at least 15-20% to make it viable for a flight from New York to London. Otherwise, it stays a "couch device."
The Lens Situation
The current Zeiss inserts are a clunky solution. They work, sure, but they’re an extra step, an extra cost, and they make sharing the headset a total nightmare. Rumors suggest Apple is looking at liquid lens technology or more adjustable internal optics for the Apple Vision Pro 2. Imagine a headset that automatically adjusts to your prescription the second you log in with Optic ID. That’s the dream. It’s also incredibly hard to manufacture at scale.
Performance and the M5 Chip Leap
The first Vision Pro runs on an M2. It’s fast, but it’s 2022 tech. By the time the Apple Vision Pro 2 hits shelves, we are likely looking at the M5 chip architecture. This isn't just about making apps open faster. It’s about thermal efficiency.
If the chip is more efficient, the fans can be smaller. If the fans are smaller, the device is lighter. It’s a domino effect. The R1 chip—the co-processor that handles all the sensor data—will also need an overhaul to reduce latency even further. We are currently at 12 milliseconds. To the human eye, that’s basically instantaneous. But to the human vestibular system? Those 12 milliseconds can still cause that slight "off" feeling after a long session. Reducing that lag is the secret sauce to curing VR motion sickness once and for all.
What Apple Got Wrong With the "External Display"
Let’s talk about EyeSight. You know, that weird, ghostly projection of your eyes on the front of the glass? It was supposed to make the headset feel less isolating. Instead, it looked like a low-resolution video of a haunted Victorian child. It was dim. It was blurry. Most people I know who own the Vision Pro think it's the weakest part of the design.
For the Apple Vision Pro 2, Apple has a choice. They can either double down and make the external display high-resolution (OLED), or they can scrap it entirely to save weight and battery life. There is a strong internal camp arguing that the "isolation" of VR isn't solved by showing a digital version of your eyes. It's solved by making the passthrough so good you don't feel like you're looking through cameras.
Battery Life is Still the Elephant in the Room
Two hours. That’s all you get. You can’t even finish Oppenheimer without being tethered to a wall. It’s frustrating. While we’d all love an internal battery, physics is a stubborn jerk. Batteries are heavy. Until solid-state battery technology becomes commercially viable for consumer electronics, the Apple Vision Pro 2 will likely keep the external pack. But it needs to be smaller, or at least offer a "hot-swap" capability so the headset doesn't shut down when you switch cables.
Price vs. Value: The "Non-Pro" Alternative
There is a lot of noise about a "cheaper" Vision headset. Let's call it the Vision Air. To get the price down from $3,500 to, say, $1,500, Apple has to cut corners. They’d probably use lower-resolution screens—maybe moving away from the 4K-per-eye Micro-OLEDs. They might use plastic instead of aluminum and glass.
But the Apple Vision Pro 2 needs to remain the flagship. It needs to be the device that proves why this category exists. If the "Air" model is for watching movies, the Pro 2 is for the person who wants to replace their entire Mac Studio setup with floating windows.
💡 You might also like: At: The Element Symbol for Astatine and Why It’s Basically a Ghost
The Software Gap
Hardware is nothing without a reason to turn it on. Right now, visionOS feels like iPadOS 1.0. It’s functional but limited. You can’t naturally arrange windows in a true 3D space without them "snapping" or behaving oddly. There’s no multi-user support. Honestly, that’s wild for a $3,500 device. You can't just hand it to your spouse to try out without a tedious "Guest Mode" setup.
The Apple Vision Pro 2 launch will likely coincide with visionOS 3.0 or 4.0. By then, we expect:
- Full Mac Virtual Display support for multiple monitors (not just one).
- Native AI integration (Apple Intelligence) that can "see" what you’re looking at and provide context.
- Better hand-tracking that doesn't get confused by low lighting or your lap.
Why You Might Want to Wait
If you are a developer or a "money-is-no-object" early adopter, the current model is a fascinating toy. For everyone else? The Apple Vision Pro 2 is the one that will actually matter. It’s the iPhone 3G moment. The first one proved it could be done; the second one makes it usable for the rest of us.
We saw this with the Apple Watch. Series 0 was slow and had terrible battery life. Series 2 and 3 fixed the core issues and turned it into a hit. The Vision Pro is on the exact same trajectory. Apple is playing a long game here. They aren't trying to sell 10 million units this year. They are trying to build the foundation for the next decade of computing.
Real-World Use Cases That Don't Suck
- Surgery and Training: Dr. Robert Masson, a neurosurgeon, has already used the Vision Pro for spinal surgery. The Pro 2 will only make this more common with better haptics.
- Complex Engineering: Being able to see a 1:1 CAD model of a jet engine in your living room isn't just cool—it's a massive productivity jump.
- The "Home Theater" for Tiny Apartments: If you live in a city like Tokyo or NYC where a 100-inch TV is impossible, this headset is actually a bargain compared to high-end home cinema gear.
Actionable Steps for Potential Buyers
If you’re on the fence about jumping into the Apple ecosystem for spatial computing, don't just read reviews. Go to an Apple Store and do the demo. It’s free, and it lasts about 30 minutes. It will tell you immediately if your eyes can handle the tech.
Secondly, check your IPD (interpupillary distance). The Vision Pro handles this automatically, but knowing your comfort level with VR headsets in general will help you decide if you're a "Pro" user or if you should wait for the lighter, cheaper model.
✨ Don't miss: The Clinton Nuclear Power Station: Why This Illinois Giant Almost Disappeared
Lastly, keep an eye on the refurbished market for the first generation. Once the Apple Vision Pro 2 is officially announced, the price of the original will crater on sites like Back Market or eBay. If you just want it for movies, a discounted Gen 1 might be the smarter financial move.
The future isn't a screen on your desk; it’s the world around you, just augmented. We are just waiting for the hardware to be as light as the idea itself.