Architecture is public. It sits on a street corner, naked to the world, begging to be photographed. You walk by the Burj Khalifa or a tiny, brutalist library in Seattle, snap a photo, and post it. Easy, right? Most people think that because a building is outdoors, it’s fair game for any use. They’re wrong. Honestly, the legal reality behind an image of a building is a messy, expensive minefield that catches businesses and creators off guard every single year.
It’s about "Freedom of Panorama." Or, in many cases, the total lack of it.
The Copyright Act of 1990 Changed Everything
Before December 1, 1990, in the United States, you could pretty much do whatever you wanted with a photo of a building. Then came the Architectural Works Copyright Protection Act. This changed the status of buildings from mere functional objects to "original works of authorship."
Now, if a building was designed after that 1990 cutoff, the architect or the firm likely owns the copyright to the design. This doesn't mean you can't take a selfie in front of it. It does mean that if you use that image of a building for a commercial purpose—like a billboard, a book cover, or a digital ad—you might be infringing on someone’s intellectual property.
Context matters. A lot. If the building is just a tiny part of a wide city skyline, you’re usually safe under the "de minimis" doctrine. But if the building is the star of the show? That’s when the lawyers start drafting cease and desist letters.
When "Public" Doesn't Mean "Free"
Take the Eiffel Tower. It’s the most famous landmark in the world. During the day, it is in the public domain. You can take a million photos and sell them as postcards. But the moment the sun goes down and the lights flicker on, the rules flip. The specific lighting display is considered a separate artistic installation. Technically, publishing a nighttime image of a building like the Eiffel Tower for commercial gain requires permission from the Société d'Exploitation de la Tour Eiffel.
💡 You might also like: What is the S\&P 500 Doing Today? Why the Record Highs Feel Different
It sounds ridiculous. It feels like a "gotcha" rule. But in the world of high-end commercial photography, these details are the difference between a successful campaign and a seven-figure settlement.
Other buildings have even stricter protections. The Transamerica Pyramid in San Francisco? Trademarked. The Flatiron Building in New York? The Gherkin in London? They all have legal teams protecting their visual identity.
The Freedom of Panorama Map
The world is a patchwork of confusing laws. In the UK, Germany, and Australia, "Freedom of Panorama" is broad. You can stand in a public place, take an image of a building, and use it commercially without a property release. It’s common sense law.
Then there’s France, Italy, and Greece. In these spots, the laws are much tighter. In Italy, the Cultural Heritage and Landscape Code can actually restrict commercial use of images of historic public monuments. You might think you’re just taking a cool shot of a ruin, but if you’re using it to sell watches, the Italian government might have something to say about it.
Why Stock Photo Sites Are So Picky
Ever tried to upload an image of a building to a site like Getty Images or Adobe Stock? They are brutal. They will reject a perfectly composed, sharp photo just because there is a recognizable modern building in the background.
📖 Related: To Whom It May Concern: Why This Old Phrase Still Works (And When It Doesn't)
They aren't being mean. They’re protecting themselves and their clients. If a car company uses your photo in a Super Bowl ad and it turns out the architect of the skyscraper in the background wants a cut, the liability is massive. Stock agencies require a "Property Release." This is a legal document signed by the property owner or the architect giving you permission to use the building’s likeness commercially.
Without that paper, your photo is basically stuck on your hard drive or limited to "Editorial Use Only."
The "Visible From a Public Place" Rule
In the U.S., there is a very specific carve-out in Section 120 of the Copyright Act. It says that if a building is located in or is visible from a public place, the copyright in the architectural work doesn't include the right to prevent the making, distributing, or public display of pictures, paintings, or photographs of the work.
Wait. Didn't I just say you could get sued?
Here is the nuance. While the copyright might not stop you, trademark law can. If a building's shape is so unique that it functions as a brand—like the Burj Al Arab in Dubai—using its image can be seen as "trademark infringement" or "unfair competition" if it implies an endorsement.
👉 See also: The Stock Market Since Trump: What Most People Get Wrong
It’s a distinction that keeps IP lawyers employed for decades.
How to Stay Safe When Using Images of Buildings
If you’re a small blogger, you’re probably fine. If you’re a business owner, you need a strategy. Don't just grab a photo from a "free" site and assume it’s cleared for commercial use. Most free sites don't verify property releases.
- Check the 1990 Rule: In the US, buildings completed before December 1, 1990, have significantly fewer protections.
- Wide vs. Tight: Use shots where the building is part of a larger environment rather than the sole focus.
- Check for Trademarks: Research if the specific building has a registered trademark for its visual appearance.
- Get a Release: If you are doing a professional shoot, always try to get a property release signed by the building management.
- Edit the Distinctions: Sometimes, removing a specific logo or a unique architectural flourish in post-production can move an image into a safer legal territory, though this is a gray area.
The digital world has made us think everything we see is ours to capture and use. But architecture is art, and art is protected. Whether it's a glass skyscraper in Manhattan or a geometric museum in Bilbao, an image of a building carries more legal weight than most people ever realize.
Practical Steps for Content Creators
Before publishing your next project featuring prominent architecture, perform a quick audit. Identify the age of the structure. If it’s modern, look for "Property Release" requirements on major stock agency "restricted" lists—Getty Images maintains a comprehensive list of buildings that require specific permissions. For high-budget commercial work, always consult with an intellectual property attorney to review the specific "Freedom of Panorama" laws in the country where the building stands. Ignoring these steps can lead to forced takedowns or expensive retroactive licensing fees that far exceed the original cost of a cleared photo. Regardless of how public a building seems, the rights to its image are often very private.