You’re scrolling through Google Discover on your phone while waiting for coffee. A headline pops up. It’s wild. It’s something about a celebrity death or a massive scientific breakthrough that seems way too big for you not to have heard about it five minutes ago. You click. The site looks legitimate enough—there are ads, a logo that looks vaguely like a major news outlet, and a byline. But it’s total nonsense. This is the classic example of a fake news article that somehow bypasses the most sophisticated algorithms on the planet to land right in front of your eyes.
It’s frustrating.
Google spends billions on AI to filter out the junk, yet the junk finds a way. Why? Because the people creating these hoaxes have figured out the "signals" that search engines crave. They aren't just writing lies; they are engineering engagement.
The Anatomy of a Hoax That Ranks
Most people think fake news is just a poorly written blog post. It isn't. Not the stuff that ranks, anyway. If you want to see a real-world example of a fake news article that successfully gamed the system, look back at the 2023 "obituary" trend. Scammers realized that when a person’s name starts trending, there is a "data void." Google’s crawlers are desperate for information to satisfy searchers. So, these bad actors spin up AI-generated obituaries for people who are still very much alive.
They use specific keywords. They use "structured data" or schema markup to tell Google, "Hey, this is a news article with a date and an author."
The algorithm sees the structure and the relevance to a trending topic and pushes it to the top. It’s a mechanical success, even if it’s a factual failure. Honestly, it’s kinda brilliant in a dark way. They aren't trying to convince a human editor; they are trying to check the boxes of a math equation.
📖 Related: Iris scanner biometric device: Why it's actually better than your fingerprint
The "Breaking News" Trap
Speed is the enemy of accuracy. When something happens—or when people think something is happening—Google prioritizes "Freshness." This is a known ranking factor. If a site publishes a story three seconds after a keyword starts spiking, it has a massive advantage.
Take the 2020 example where a fake "official" document circulated claiming a certain European country was going back into a total lockdown before any announcement was made. It was formatted to look like a government PDF. Because so many people were searching for "lockdown update," Google’s automated systems grabbed the most "relevant" looking document.
It didn't matter that the URL was slightly off. The sheer volume of clicks acted as a "vote" of confidence in the eyes of the machine. The more people clicked in panic, the higher it climbed. It’s a feedback loop of misinformation.
Why Google Discover is the New Wild West
Discover is different from Search. In Search, you ask a question. In Discover, Google guesses what you want. It’s an "interest feed." This makes it incredibly vulnerable to clickbait.
If you’ve ever clicked on a story about a specific hobby or a niche TV show, Google thinks, "Oh, they love this." Then, a site produces a fake story about that show being canceled. Because you’ve shown interest in the past, Google pushes that example of a fake news article directly to your home screen. You didn’t even have to look for it. It found you.
The "human-quality" of these fakes has also skyrocketed. We aren't just talking about misspelled words anymore. With large language models, a teenager in a basement can generate 5,000 words of "authoritative-sounding" text about a fake geopolitical crisis in minutes.
The prose is smooth.
The grammar is perfect.
The facts are just... missing.
Spotting the Red Flags in the Wild
You have to be a bit of a detective now. It’s not enough to trust the "Top Stories" box anymore. One major red flag is the "About this result" panel, but even that can be manipulated if a site has been around long enough to gain "domain authority."
- Check the URL carefully. A very common tactic is "typosquatting." Instead of
nytimes.com, you might seenytimes-news.comor something similar. - Reverse image search the lead photo. Often, a fake news article uses a photo from a protest in 2014 and claims it’s from yesterday.
- Look for the "Source Consensus." If a massive event is happening, every single outlet from the BBC to Al Jazeera will be covering it. If only one weirdly named website has the "scoop," it’s fake. Basically 100% of the time.
Honestly, the most dangerous fakes are the ones that confirm what we already want to believe. Psychologists call this "confirmation bias." If you see a headline that makes you feel a surge of anger or vindication, that is the exact moment you need to be the most skeptical. The creators of these articles are banking on your emotional reaction to trigger a share before you even finish the second paragraph.
The Role of "Zombie" Websites
Sometimes, an old, reputable local newspaper goes out of business. The domain expires. A bad actor buys that domain because it already has "trust" in Google’s eyes. They then start churning out fake content. This is a particularly insidious example of a fake news article because the URL itself carries a history of legitimacy. To the algorithm, the site is a trusted source. To the reader, it looks like a local paper. But the "journalists" are just bots or low-paid ghostwriters halfway across the world.
How to Protect Your Own Feed
You can actually train the algorithm to be better. If you see a fake story in Google Discover, don’t just swipe it away. Use the three-dot menu and select "Not interested in [Topic]" or "Report content." This sends a direct signal back to the mothership that the content was low quality.
Also, diversify where you get your news. Don't rely solely on an AI-curated feed. Go directly to the sources you trust. Bookmark them. Pay for a subscription if you can. Quality journalism costs money to produce; fake news is almost free to manufacture.
Actionable Steps for the Skeptical Reader
- Verify the "Primary Source": If an article says "According to a report by the FDA," go to the FDA website. If the report isn't there, the article is a lie.
- Examine the Bylines: Click the author's name. Do they have a profile? Do they write for other places? If the author "John Smith" has written 40 articles in the last two hours on 40 different topics, he’s not a human.
- Check the "Contact Us" Page: Legitimate news organizations have physical addresses and real phone numbers. Fake sites usually have a generic contact form or nothing at all.
- Install a Fact-Checking Extension: Tools like NewsGuard or similar browser add-ons provide a "nutrition label" for news sites, telling you if a site has a history of publishing falsehoods.
The battle against misinformation isn't just a tech problem. It’s a human one. As long as we are susceptible to sensationalism, there will be someone willing to profit from a fake news article. Stay sharp. Read past the headline. If it feels like it’s designed to make you scream at your screen, it probably is.
Start by auditing your own Discover feed today. Clean out the junk, report the obvious fakes, and stop giving the "zombie" sites the clicks they need to survive. It’s the only way to make the internet a little less chaotic.