If you look at an election of 1860 drawing, you’re not just looking at old ink on paper. You’re looking at a country about to explode. Seriously. People back then didn't have TikTok or 24-hour cable news to vent their frustrations, so they used political cartoons—lithographs, mostly—to absolutely roast their opponents. It was brutal.
Most people think of the 1860 election as a simple four-way race where Abraham Lincoln just kind of showed up and won. But the visual record tells a way more chaotic story. These drawings were the "memes" of the 19th century. They were designed to be understood by everyone, even people who couldn't read well. They were visceral, often mean-spirited, and packed with symbols that we’ve mostly forgotten how to decode.
The Rail-Splitter and the Giant Mauls
One of the most famous images from this era is a lithograph titled "The Rail Candidate." If you’ve ever seen an election of 1860 drawing featuring Lincoln carrying a literal wooden rail on his shoulder, you’ve seen the birth of a brand. Lincoln's campaign managers were geniuses. They took a guy who was basically a corporate lawyer for the railroads and rebranded him as a humble, axe-swinging frontiersman.
In these drawings, you often see Lincoln straddling a "Republican Platform" made of literal wooden rails. It’s funny because, in some of these illustrations, the rails are being held up by enslaved people or by radical abolitionists like Horace Greeley. This was the opposition’s way of saying, "Hey, this 'honest Abe' guy is actually a puppet for the people who want to tear the country apart." The imagery was deliberate. It was tactical.
It’s easy to forget that Lincoln wasn't a hero to everyone in 1860. Far from it. In many Southern-leaning drawings, he was depicted as a gangly, awkward, and even frightening figure. The contrast between the "Honest Abe" drawings produced in the North and the "Black Republican" caricatures in the South shows exactly how divided the United States had become. There was no middle ground left.
A Four-Way Mess in Ink
Let’s talk about the competition. You had Stephen A. Douglas (Northern Democrat), John C. Breckinridge (Southern Democrat), and John Bell (Constitutional Union Party). If you find an election of 1860 drawing called "The National Game. Three Outs and One Run," you’ll see the whole mess laid out like a baseball game.
Lincoln stands at home plate, holding a "rail" for a bat. Douglas, Breckinridge, and Bell are all failing miserably in the field. It’s a great piece of pro-Lincoln propaganda, but it also highlights the mathematical reality of that year. The Democratic Party had basically split in two, which is the political equivalent of trying to win a marathon while tripping over your own shoelaces.
💡 You might also like: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
- Stephen Douglas: Usually drawn as "Little Giant," often looking short and stout next to the towering Lincoln.
- John Breckinridge: Frequently depicted as a puppet of the "Slave Power" or standing on a platform that's literally crumbling into the ocean.
- John Bell: Usually shown trying to "glue" the Union back together with a tiny pot of paste, looking totally overwhelmed.
The visual metaphors weren't subtle. In "The Political Quadrille," another famous election of 1860 drawing, the four candidates are shown dancing with different partners. Lincoln is dancing with a Black woman, a jab at the Republican Party's supposed "socialist" and "abolitionist" tendencies. This wasn't just art; it was a warning. It was fear-mongering in high definition for the 1860s.
The Currier & Ives Factor
You can't talk about these drawings without mentioning Currier & Ives. They were the kings of the lithograph. Based in New York, they churned out these prints like crazy because people would actually buy them to hang in their homes or taverns.
Think about that for a second. Imagine printing out a political meme today and framing it in your living room. That’s how much these images mattered. They were the primary way people "consumed" the personalities of the candidates. Since Lincoln didn't really travel or give speeches during the campaign (that was the tradition back then), a drawing was often the only way a voter in rural Pennsylvania or Ohio would ever "see" him.
But these drawings also had a dark side. The 1860 campaign was arguably the most racist in American history up to that point. Pro-slavery artists used lithography to create horrific caricatures. They wanted to convince white voters that a Lincoln victory would lead to "Amalgamation"—a 19th-century term for interracial marriage. When you look at an election of 1860 drawing from a Southern press, you're seeing the visual architecture of white supremacy being used as a campaign tool. It’s heavy stuff, but you can’t look away if you want to understand why the Civil War started months later.
Decoding the Symbols
If you’re looking at an old print and you’re confused, look for these specific things:
- The Eagle: Usually represents the Union. If it’s looking skinny or sick, the artist thinks the country is in trouble.
- The Axe: Lincoln’s primary "accessory." It symbolized his work ethic but also his potential to "chop" the Union in half.
- The Globe: Often shows the U.S. being ripped apart or sold off.
- The Whiskey Jug: Usually used to discredit Stephen Douglas, who was rumored to have a drinking problem.
It’s kinda fascinating how little has changed. We still use these tropes. We still use "strongman" imagery for candidates we like and "frail/clumsy" imagery for those we don't. The election of 1860 drawing was the blueprint for the modern political attack ad.
📖 Related: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different
Why the Art Still Matters in 2026
Honestly, studying these drawings is a reality check. We tend to think our current political climate is uniquely toxic. Then you look at a drawing from 1860 where a candidate is being depicted as a literal devil or a traitor, and you realize we've been here before.
The 1860 drawings weren't just about winning an election; they were about defining what "America" was going to be. Was it a collection of sovereign states? Or was it a single, indivisible nation? The artists of the time were taking those massive, philosophical questions and boiling them down into a single scene with a few snarky captions.
How to Analyze an 1860 Political Print
If you're a collector or just a history nerd, here's how you actually "read" one of these things without getting lost:
First, check the source. Was it printed in New York or Richmond? That tells you the bias immediately. Second, look at the feet. Seriously. In many 1860 drawings, the way a candidate stands—on a shaky platform, on a "mason-dixon line," or on a specific map—tells you exactly what the artist thinks about their policy.
Third, look for the "ghosts." Many of these drawings include background figures like George Washington or Andrew Jackson looking down in shame. It’s the 19th-century version of saying "our ancestors are rolling in their graves."
Actionable Insights for History Enthusiasts
If you want to dive deeper into this visual history, don't just look at Google Images. There are better ways to get the "real" experience.
👉 See also: Nate Silver Trump Approval Rating: Why the 2026 Numbers Look So Different
Visit the Library of Congress Online Archives
The LOC has a massive digital collection of 1860 political cartoons. You can zoom in to see the tiny details, like the text on the tiny slips of paper candidates are often holding. It’s free and way higher quality than what you'll find on most blogs.
Check Out Local Historical Societies
If you live in the Northeast or the Midwest, your local historical society might actually have original Currier & Ives prints. Seeing the actual size of these things—often 10x14 inches or larger—changes how you perceive their impact. They weren't small thumb-nail images; they were bold statements meant to be seen from across a room.
Learn the "Lithography" Process
Understanding how these were made makes you appreciate them more. Artists had to carve these images into limestone blocks. One mistake and the whole thing was ruined. This wasn't a "quick post" on social media; it was a laborious, expensive process that required a team of craftsmen.
Use These as Teaching Tools
If you're a teacher or a parent, use an election of 1860 drawing to start a conversation about perspective. Ask, "Who do you think paid for this drawing?" It’s the easiest way to teach media literacy using a 160-year-old example.
The 1860 election was a breaking point for the United States. While the speeches and the legislation are important, the drawings are where the "vibe" of the era truly lives. They capture the fear, the humor, and the sheer stakes of a moment when the country was deciding if it would continue to exist. Next time you see a lanky, black-and-white Lincoln holding a wooden rail, remember: you’re looking at a piece of the most successful PR campaign in American history.