You're probably looking at a screen right now. In fact, I’d bet money on it. Maybe you’re on a train, or ignoring a meeting, or lying in bed while the blue light burns your retinas at 2 AM. We all do it. But back in 1985, a guy named Neil Postman wrote a book called Amusing Ourselves to Death, and he basically predicted this exact predicament before the high-speed internet was even a glimmer in the public's eye. He wasn't just complaining about TV. He was terrified that we were trading our ability to think for the constant hit of "pleasurable" information.
It’s a heavy thought.
Postman’s big argument was that the medium—how we get our info—actually changes the info itself. If you get your news from a 30-second TikTok clip with a "subway surfers" video playing underneath it, that news isn't the same as a 5,000-word investigative report. The context dies. The nuance evaporates. We’re left with what he called "disinformation"—not necessarily lies, but information that is misplaced, irrelevant, or fragmented. It creates the illusion of knowing something when you actually don't.
The Orwell vs. Huxley Problem
Most people think of the future as a dark, "Big Brother" dystopia. We’re scared of 1984. We’re scared of the government banning books or cameras in our living rooms. But Postman pointed out that Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World was the much more likely reality.
In Orwell’s world, people are controlled by inflicting pain. In Huxley’s, they’re controlled by inflicting pleasure. Orwell feared those who would deprive us of information. Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. Orwell feared that the truth would be concealed from us. Huxley feared the truth would be drowned in a sea of irrelevance.
Honestly? Look around. Huxley won.
📖 Related: Why 3 4 sleeve mother of the bride gowns are basically the only thing people want to wear right now
We aren't being forced to watch propaganda. We are choosing it because it’s shiny and moves fast. When everything is presented as entertainment—from politics to religion to education—we stop asking if it’s true and start asking if it’s fun. If it’s not fun, we swipe. That’s the danger. It’s a soft tyranny of the "Like" button.
How Modern Technology Broke the Context-Counter
Think about the "Now... This" phenomenon. Postman obsessed over this phrase used by news anchors. It’s a transition that tells you that whatever you just saw—a famine, a murder, a political collapse—has no connection to what you’re about to see next. "A school bus crashed in Ohio. Now... this weather report!"
It’s jarring. Or it should be.
But we’ve become so accustomed to it that we don't even blink. On Instagram or X, you might see a photo of a genocide followed immediately by a sponsored ad for a probiotic soda, followed by a meme of a cat playing a piano. Your brain isn't wired to handle that kind of emotional whiplash. The result is a weird kind of apathy. We see everything, so we feel nothing.
The "Amusing Ourselves to Death" philosophy suggests that when communication becomes a series of disjointed flashes, we lose the "line" of history. We live in a perpetual present. There is no yesterday, no tomorrow, just the current scroll.
The Death of the Typographic Mind
Before the telegraph and the photograph, people lived in what Postman called a "typographic culture." People read long, boring, dense books. They listened to seven-hour political debates (like the Lincoln-Douglas debates) without checking their watches. Why? Because their brains were trained for linear, logical thought.
📖 Related: The Aston Martin Cheapest Car New: What Most People Get Wrong
Print requires you to sit still. It requires you to follow a sequence of ideas. It’s hard work.
Visual media? It’s the opposite. It’s all about the image. You don't "argue" with an image. You just feel it. You can't say an image of a sunset is "false" in the same way you can say a written sentence is false. Images just are. And as our culture moved from the page to the screen, we stopped valuing logic and started valuing "aesthetic appeal."
This is why a politician's haircut matters more than their policy paper. It’s why a scientist who is charismatic on camera gets more funding than one who is brilliant but mumbles. We’ve swapped substance for "showmanship."
Real-World Consequences of a Distracted Public
This isn't just some academic theory. It has teeth.
Take the 2024 and 2026 election cycles as a case study. The majority of political discourse happened in snippets. Not policy debates, but "gotcha" moments. When Amusing Ourselves to Death hits the real world, complex problems—like the national debt or climate change—get turned into memes. You can't solve the national debt in a meme. But you can make people angry about it in 10 seconds.
The health industry feels it too. We see "bio-hackers" on YouTube giving medical advice that contradicts decades of peer-reviewed research. Because they have high production values and 4K cameras, we trust them more than a dusty medical journal. We are being entertained into making bad life choices.
- Political discourse: Becomes a branch of the entertainment industry.
- Education: "Gamified" until the actual learning becomes secondary to the points earned.
- Religion: Turned into "televangelism" or "influencer spirituality" where the message must be upbeat to keep the ratings high.
The common thread is that the seriousness of these topics is stripped away to make them "palatable."
What Most People Get Wrong About Postman
A lot of critics say Postman was just a Luddite who hated technology. That’s a bit of a lazy take, frankly. He didn't want to smash the TVs; he wanted us to understand what the TV was doing to our brains.
He wasn't saying "entertainment is bad." He was saying that when entertainment becomes the primary lens through which we experience the world, we lose our grip on reality. It’s fine to watch a sitcom. It’s dangerous when the news becomes a sitcom.
There’s also this idea that the internet "fixed" this because it’s interactive. People thought, "Hey, we aren't passive viewers anymore! We're participating!" But in many ways, the internet just accelerated the problem. We aren't just consuming the entertainment; we are the entertainment. We’ve turned our own lives into a broadcast, constantly editing our "feed" to be more amusing to others.
Breaking the Cycle: Actionable Insights
So, what do we actually do? We can't go live in a cave. Well, you could, but the Wi-Fi is terrible.
The goal isn't to quit technology, but to build a "defense" against the mindless pull of the screen. You have to intentionally re-introduce friction into your life.
First, change your "info-diet" structure. Stop getting news from social media feeds. If you want to know what’s happening in the world, go to a primary source or a long-form publication. Force yourself to read something that takes more than 10 minutes to finish. It’s going to feel itchy and uncomfortable at first. That’s your brain’s "attention muscle" being weak. Work it out.
Second, recognize the "Now... This" moments. When you're scrolling, pause. When you see a tragic story followed by a funny one, take a second to acknowledge how weird that is. Don't just let the algorithm slide you into the next emotion. Developing this awareness is like a "firewall" for your brain.
Third, value silence over stimulation. Postman argued that our culture is terrified of silence because silence requires thought. Try a "digital Sabbath." One day a week, or even just a few hours, where the goal isn't to be amused. Boredom is actually where deep thinking happens.
💡 You might also like: Finding the Right Happy Father's Day Blessings Without Sounding Like a Greeting Card
Finally, ask the "Postman Question." Whenever you consume a piece of media, ask: "What is this asking me to ignore?" If it’s a flashy video, it’s probably asking you to ignore the complex, boring details. If it’s an angry tweet, it’s asking you to ignore the humanity of the person on the other side.
The world is not a show. It’s a messy, complicated, often boring place that requires our full, undivided attention to navigate. We can't afford to be "amused" while it falls apart.
Practical Steps to Reclaim Your Attention:
- Turn off all non-human notifications. If a person didn't send it, you don't need a buzz in your pocket for it. News alerts, game invites, and "suggested" posts are just hooks to get you back into the amusement loop.
- Read physical books. There is a tactile, spatial memory associated with paper that screens don't provide. It forces a slower pace of information processing.
- Watch long-form content intentionally. Instead of "vibe-scrolling" for two hours, pick one two-hour movie or documentary and watch it from start to finish without your phone. Practice being "captured" by a single narrative again.
- Engage in "low-stimulus" hobbies. Gardening, woodworking, or even just walking without a podcast. These activities help reset your dopamine baselines so that reality doesn't feel "boring" compared to the digital world.
The problem isn't the technology itself; it's our blindness to its effects. Once you see the "amusement trap," it becomes a lot easier to step around it.