It was 2010. 3D glasses were still a novelty people actually tolerated, and Disney decided to hand the keys to their most psychedelic kingdom to a man who basically built his career on pinstripes and shadows. When the Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton directed finally hit theaters, it wasn't just a movie. It was a billion-dollar cultural event that somehow managed to be both a massive success and a total lightning rod for criticism.
Honestly? It's kind of a weird beast.
If you go back and watch it now, the visuals hit you like a fever dream. But the story? That’s where things get messy. Burton didn't just remake the 1951 animated classic. He didn't even really adapt Lewis Carroll's book in a traditional way. Instead, he made a "sequel" where a 19-year-old Alice returns to Underland—yeah, not Wonderland—with absolutely no memory of her first trip.
People were confused. Some loved the gothic makeover. Others felt like the whimsical heart of Carroll’s nonsense was replaced by a generic "Chosen One" plot that felt more like The Chronicles of Narnia than a trip down the rabbit hole.
The Visual Identity of a Billion-Dollar Fever Dream
You can't talk about this movie without talking about the look. It’s iconic. It's also, if we’re being real, a bit much.
Burton teamed up with his usual suspects, including costume designer Colleen Atwood and production designer Robert Stromberg. They created a world that looked like a Victorian storybook dipped in neon acid. The Red Queen’s palace is all sharp angles and oppressive reds, while the Mad Hatter’s tea party feels like a graveyard for porcelain. It’s beautiful. It’s also claustrophobic because of the heavy-handed CGI.
Back then, the industry was obsessed with "volume" and green screens. Because of that, the Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton ended up feeling a little floaty. Mia Wasikowska, who played Alice, often looked like she was walking through a painting rather than a physical space.
Interestingly, the film won Academy Awards for Best Art Direction and Best Costume Design. You can see why. Every stitch on Johnny Depp’s Hatter costume tells a story, from the thimbles on his fingers to the changing colors of his eyes based on his mood. It’s high-effort world-building. But did the soul of the story get lost in all that digital lace? A lot of critics at the time, like Roger Ebert, thought so. He gave it two stars, calling it a "visual treat" but lacking a "heart."
That "Chosen One" Narrative: What Went Wrong?
Here is the thing about Lewis Carroll's original Alice’s Adventures in Wonderland. It has no plot. Not really.
It’s just a girl wandering through a series of increasingly frustrating logic puzzles and rude animals. Alice is a spectator. She’s reactive. She’s just trying to survive the nonsense.
The Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton version takes that and tosses it out the window. Linda Woolverton, the screenwriter who also wrote Beauty and the Beast, turned Alice into a warrior. She has a prophecy. She has a sword called the Vorpal Sword. She has to slay the Jabberwocky on "Frabjous Day."
📖 Related: Big Brother 27 Morgan: What Really Happened Behind the Scenes
It turned a surrealist masterpiece into a standard hero's journey.
This is the biggest sticking point for purists. By giving Alice a destiny, the movie removes the "wonder" and replaces it with "war." Suddenly, Underland isn't a place of chaotic nonsense; it’s a political landscape with a rightful ruler and an usurper. The Red Queen (Helena Bonham Carter) is the villain, and the White Queen (Anne Hathaway) is the "good" one, even though Hathaway played her with a subtle, creepy twitchiness that suggested she wasn't exactly a saint.
Johnny Depp and the Mad Hatter Problem
In 2010, Johnny Depp was the biggest star on the planet. He was fresh off the peak of Pirates of the Caribbean, and his collaboration with Burton was the stuff of legend.
His take on the Mad Hatter was... divisive.
To some, it was a brilliant portrayal of PTSD and mercury poisoning (the actual cause of "madness" in 19th-century hatters). To others, it was just Depp doing "weird for the sake of weird." He wore orange wigs, contact lenses that made his eyes look huge, and spoke in a lisping Scottish accent when he got angry.
The movie focuses a lot on him. Like, a lot.
Some fans argue that the Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton should have been called The Mad Hatter and Alice. His backstory with the Hightopp clan and his relationship with the Red Queen takes up a huge chunk of the emotional real estate. It’s a classic case of a movie being retooled to fit its biggest star. Is it entertaining? Sure. Does it overshadow Alice's own growth? Absolutely.
The Impact on the "Live-Action Remake" Trend
We have to acknowledge the elephant in the room. This movie is the reason we have so many Disney live-action remakes today.
Before 2010, Disney wasn't really doing this. After Alice made $1.025 billion worldwide, the floodgates opened. Maleficent, Cinderella, Beauty and the Beast, The Lion King—they all owe their existence to the financial success of Burton’s Underland.
It proved that there was a massive global appetite for "reimagined" childhood classics with a darker, more "mature" aesthetic. Even if the reviews were mixed, the money was undeniable.
👉 See also: The Lil Wayne Tracklist for Tha Carter 3: What Most People Get Wrong
A Closer Look at the Supporting Cast
One thing the Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton got undeniably right was the voice casting.
- Alan Rickman as Absolem the Caterpillar. His voice is like velvet and smoke. It’s perfect.
- Stephen Fry as the Cheshire Cat. He brings a level of smug, floating charm that feels exactly right for a cat that can disappear at will.
- Michael Sheen as the White Rabbit. He’s neurotic, frantic, and grounded in a way the rest of the film isn't.
These performances provide the texture that the CGI sometimes lacks. When Rickman’s Absolem blows smoke rings at Alice, you actually feel the weight of his boredom and wisdom. It’s a reminder that even in a sea of digital effects, a great actor can still anchor a scene.
Why the Sequel Didn't Land the Same Way
Six years later, we got Alice Through the Looking Glass. Burton didn't return to direct; James Bobin took over.
It tanked.
Well, maybe not tanked, but compared to the first one, it was a massive disappointment. It grossed about $300 million. That sounds like a lot until you realize the first one did triple that.
The sequel leaned even harder into the "epic fantasy" tropes and time-travel mechanics. It felt less like Wonderland and more like a generic blockbuster. The novelty of Burton’s visual style had worn off, and the audience had moved on to other things. It’s a fascinating case study in how a specific director's vision can be the primary selling point for a franchise, even if that vision is controversial.
The Cultural Legacy of Underland
Despite the criticism, Burton’s version has a massive cult following, especially in the gothic and alternative communities.
Go to any fan convention, and you’ll still see Mad Hatter cosplayers. Hot Topic sold out of Alice-inspired clothes for years. The "Futterwacken" dance (the weird breakdancing the Hatter does at the end) might have been widely mocked by critics, but it became a meme before memes were even really a thing.
The film captures a very specific 2010 "aesthetic." It’s moody. It’s over-designed. It’s theatrical.
And maybe that’s why it still matters. It wasn't trying to be a "safe" adaptation. It took a massive swing. Burton wanted to make Alice a rebel who refuses to marry the boring Lord Ascot and instead chooses a life of adventure on the high seas. In the final scene, Alice stands on a ship, ready to trade China, representing a total break from Victorian expectations.
✨ Don't miss: Songs by Tyler Childers: What Most People Get Wrong
That empowerment angle resonated with a lot of young viewers, even if the "Jabberwocky fight" felt a bit like a video game boss battle.
Navigating the Critics vs. the Fans
If you look at Rotten Tomatoes, the movie sits at around 51%. That’s a "Rotten" score.
But if you look at the box office and the merchandising, the movie was a triumph. This gap happens a lot with Tim Burton. His style is so specific—what some call "Burtonesque"—that it either clicks with you or it feels like an assault on the senses.
Critics like Peter Travers from Rolling Stone praised the visual "trippiness" but lamented the lack of narrative cohesion. Meanwhile, audiences were flocking to IMAX screens to see the Red Queen shout "Off with their heads!" in 3D.
How to Re-Watch It Today
If you’re planning to revisit the Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton created, try to look past the CGI.
Focus on the small details. Look at the way the Knave of Hearts (Crispin Glover) moves—he’s genuinely unsettling. Watch the interplay between the Tweedles (Matt Lucas). There is a lot of craftsmanship hidden under the layers of digital gloss.
Don't expect a faithful adaptation of the book. It’s not that. It’s a "Dark Fantasy" remix. Once you accept that it’s essentially an original story using Carroll’s characters as avatars, it becomes a much more enjoyable experience.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Collectors
If you're looking to dive deeper into the world Burton created, here are a few things you should actually do:
- Check out the Art Book: Alice in Wonderland: A Visual Companion by Mark Salisbury is actually incredible. It shows the concept art before it was digitized, and honestly, the sketches are sometimes more haunting than the final film.
- Compare the Soundtrack: Danny Elfman’s score is some of his best work. But don't sleep on Almost Alice, the "inspired by" album. It features tracks from Shinedown, Franz Ferdinand, and Robert Smith. It’s a time capsule of 2010 alternative rock.
- Visit the Costumes: If you ever get a chance to see a Colleen Atwood exhibit, go. Seeing the textures of the Red Queen’s dress in person makes you realize how much work went into the physical assets of a movie that felt very "digital."
- Watch the 1951 Version Immediately After: It’s a great exercise in seeing how different directors interpret "nonsense." One is whimsical and colorful; the other is heavy and gothic. Both are valid, but they feel like they’re from different planets.
The Alice in Wonderland film Tim Burton made isn't perfect. It’s loud, it’s messy, and it’s occasionally confusing. But it’s also bold. It’s a movie that refused to be small. Love it or hate it, it changed the trajectory of Hollywood for over a decade. And in a world of safe, predictable movies, there’s something to be said for a billion-dollar experiment that dares to be a little bit mad.
After all, as the Hatter says, all the best people are.
To explore more about Burton's filmography, you can track his evolution from Edward Scissorhands to his more recent work on Wednesday. Seeing how he handles "outcast" characters across different decades gives a lot of context to why his Alice is the way she is—less of a victim and more of a misfit finding her own path. You might also find it useful to read the original "Jabberwocky" poem by Lewis Carroll to see exactly which lines Burton chose to turn into literal plot points. It’s a fascinating look at how a few stanzas of nonsense verse can be stretched into a cinematic climax.