We used to think they were invisible. For decades, the black hole was a mathematical ghost, a tear in the fabric of spacetime that swallowed light so completely it left nothing behind for a camera to catch. If you asked an astrophysicist in the 1990s if we’d ever see one, they’d probably give you a polite "maybe" while internally thinking about the sheer impossibility of the physics involved.
Then 2019 happened.
The Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) collaboration released the first of the actual images of black holes, specifically the supermassive giant at the center of the Messier 87 galaxy. It wasn't a crisp, 4K render. It was a blurry, glowing orange donut. Some people were disappointed. They shouldn't have been. That "blurry" ring was the result of eight ground-based radio telescopes turning the entire planet Earth into one giant virtual lens.
It’s easy to forget how tiny these things appear from our backyard. Imaging the M87* black hole is roughly equivalent to trying to photograph an orange on the surface of the moon using a camera sitting on your desk in New York.
The Physics of the "Glowing Donut"
What you’re seeing in these actual images of black holes isn't the black hole itself. That’s physically impossible. You’re looking at the silhouette. The dark center—the "shadow"—is where light has been pulled past the event horizon, the point of no return. The glowing ring around it is the accretion disk, a swirling maelstrom of gas and dust spinning at nearly the speed of light.
It gets weird here.
Because gravity is so intense, it bends the light from the back of the disk and flings it over the top toward us. You aren't just seeing the front; you're seeing a warped view of the entire environment. It’s a gravitational lens that would make Christopher Nolan’s head spin. Speaking of Nolan, Interstellar got a lot right, but it missed one crucial detail: the Doppler effect.
👉 See also: Astronauts Stuck in Space: What Really Happens When the Return Flight Gets Cancelled
In a real image, one side of the ring is always brighter than the other. Why? Because that side of the gas is screaming toward us at relativistic speeds, which "boosts" the light’s intensity. The other side is moving away, so it looks dimmer. If you see a perfectly symmetrical ring in a movie, it’s fake. Real physics is lopsided.
Why M87* and Sagittarius A* Look Different
The EHT didn't stop with M87*. In 2022, they gave us a look at Sagittarius A* (Sgr A*), the beast living in our own Milky Way galaxy. Even though Sgr A* is much closer to us, it was actually harder to photograph.
Size matters.
M87* is a monster. It’s billions of times the mass of our sun. Because it’s so big, the gas orbiting it takes days or even weeks to complete a full circuit. It stays relatively still during the long exposure times needed to capture data. Sgr A* is a relative shrimp. It’s only about 4 million solar masses. The gas around it moves so fast that the "image" changes every few minutes.
Basically, M87* was like taking a portrait of a person sitting still. Sgr A* was like trying to photograph a hyperactive puppy running in circles in a dark room. The resulting image is a composite, a "best guess" based on thousands of snapshots stitched together by algorithms like CHIRP, pioneered by researchers like Katie Bouman.
Polarized Light: The 2021 Breakthrough
Most people saw the 2019 photo and moved on. But in 2021, the EHT team released a new version of the M87* image that looked like it had "brushstrokes" on it. This wasn't just an Instagram filter. These lines represent the polarization of light.
✨ Don't miss: EU DMA Enforcement News Today: Why the "Consent or Pay" Wars Are Just Getting Started
This is a big deal.
Polarization tells us about the magnetic fields. We've known for a long time that black holes aren't just vacuum cleaners; they are also massive engines that launch jets of plasma across entire galaxies. By looking at these polarized actual images of black holes, scientists realized that the magnetic fields at the edge are strong enough to push back against the gravity, helping some of that gas escape the "clutches" of the void and shoot out into space.
It’s a violent, beautiful balance between the pull of gravity and the push of magnetism.
The Tech Behind the Lens
How do you build a telescope the size of Earth? You don't. You use Very Long Baseline Interferometry (VLBI).
The EHT uses atomic clocks—specifically hydrogen masers—to sync up data from telescopes in Hawaii, Chile, Spain, and even the South Pole. They record so much data that it can’t be sent over the internet. Literally. They have to fly physical hard drives (petabytes of data) to central processing centers at the MIT Haystack Observatory and the Max Planck Institute for Radio Astronomy.
Fun fact: The South Pole data is often the last to arrive because you can’t fly planes out of Antarctica during the winter. Science literally waits for the seasons to change just to process one pixel of a black hole.
🔗 Read more: Apple Watch Digital Face: Why Your Screen Layout Is Probably Killing Your Battery (And How To Fix It)
Common Misconceptions You've Probably Heard
- "The images are fake/CGI." No. They are reconstructions. It's like a medical MRI. A doctor doesn't "look" into your brain with their eyes; a machine collects data and a computer interprets it into an image. Same thing here.
- "They are orange because they are hot." Kinda, but not really. The gas is millions of degrees, but the orange color is a "false color" choice. Radio telescopes don't see color. The scientists chose orange to represent the intensity of the radio waves. It could have been purple or green, but orange feels right for a fiery disk of doom.
- "We should see the 'hole' clearly." We do see the shadow, but the resolution is still limited. We are looking at the very edge of what physics allows us to see from this distance.
What's Next? (The "Black Hole Movie")
The goal isn't just more photos. It's video.
The next generation of the EHT (ngEHT) is adding more telescopes to the array. They want to capture the "flicker" of Sgr A* in real-time. Imagine seeing the gas actually swirl around the event horizon. That’s not science fiction anymore; it's the next five to ten years of astrophysics.
We are also looking at different wavelengths. While the EHT uses 1.3mm radio waves, moving to even shorter wavelengths would sharpen the image significantly. It's the difference between a blurry VHS tape and a DVD. We aren't at Blu-ray level yet, but we're getting there.
How to Follow the Real Science
If you want to stay updated on actual images of black holes, don't just wait for the nightly news to summarize it into a 10-second clip.
- Check the EHT official site. They release the "clean" data and the peer-reviewed papers (often in The Astrophysical Journal Letters) simultaneously.
- Look for "Pre-prints" on ArXiv. If you want to see the math before it goes mainstream, that's where the researchers post their drafts.
- NASA’s Chandra X-ray Observatory. Black holes look different in X-rays than they do in radio waves. Comparing the two is how we understand the "weather" around a black hole.
The most important takeaway is that these images prove Einstein was right. Again. Every time we look at the universe with a better camera, General Relativity holds up. The shape of the shadow, the size of the ring—it all fits the math scribbled down over a century ago.
Stop thinking of black holes as "nothingness." These images show they are the most energetic, chaotic, and visible things in our universe. They are the anchors of galaxies. And we finally have the "polaroids" to prove they exist exactly how we suspected they did.
Actionable Next Steps:
- Visit the Event Horizon Telescope gallery to download the high-resolution, non-compressed files of M87* and Sgr A*.
- Use a tool like the "Black Hole Visualization" simulator by NASA to see how gravitational lensing changes based on your viewing angle.
- Keep an eye out for upcoming announcements regarding the "Photon Ring," a theoretical thin sub-ring of light that should be visible with even higher-resolution imaging in the late 2020s.