Honestly, if you ask most people about Charles Dickens on screen, they immediately start talking about Ralph Fiennes or that weirdly dark Great Expectations from a few years back. But for the real nerds, the ones who actually care about the grit of the French Revolution, the conversation usually stops at the a tale of two cities 1958 movie. It’s the black-and-white masterpiece that somehow manages to be more colorful than anything filmed in 4K today.
Ralph Thomas directed it. Dirk Bogarde starred in it. And yeah, it’s basically perfect.
Most adaptations of this book feel like a costume party where everyone is terrified of getting a smudge on their silk breeches. Not this one. This film feels heavy. You can almost smell the stale wine and the damp cobblestones of 18th-century Paris. It’s a movie that understands that Dickens wasn't just writing a romance; he was writing a horror story about what happens when a society finally snaps.
The Bogarde Factor: Why Sydney Carton works here
You can’t talk about the a tale of two cities 1958 movie without talking about Dirk Bogarde. Before he became the darling of arthouse cinema in the 60s, Bogarde was a massive matinee idol. He had that "Rank Organisation" polish, but there was always something a little bit broken behind his eyes. That’s exactly what Sydney Carton needs.
Carton is a tough role to pull off because he’s a drunk. He’s a "self-flayed" man, as Dickens puts it. Most actors play him as a hero who just happens to have a flask. Bogarde plays him as a man who genuinely hates himself. It’s uncomfortable to watch at times. When he’s lounging in the courtroom, looking bored out of his mind while Charles Darnay’s life hangs in the balance, you see the wasted brilliance. It isn't just acting; it’s a character study in nihilism.
Contrast that with Paul Guers, who played Charles Darnay. Guers was actually a French actor, which was a smart move by the production. Usually, in these movies, everyone just speaks with a crisp British accent regardless of whether they’re in London or Paris. Having a French actor for Darnay adds this subtle layer of "otherness" that makes the tension in the London scenes actually work. You realize Darnay is an exile. He’s vulnerable.
👉 See also: The Entire History of You: What Most People Get Wrong About the Grain
It was shot in black and white for a reason
By 1958, color was everywhere. Gigi won Best Picture that year. Technicolor was the standard for big-budget epics. So why did Ralph Thomas choose to shoot the a tale of two cities 1958 movie in black and white?
Money was part of it, sure. But artistically? It was the right call.
Cinematographer Ernest Steward used high-contrast lighting that makes the French streets look like a fever dream. The shadows are deep. The whites are blinding. When the mob starts sharpening their blades at the grindstone, the lack of color makes the scene feel like a documentary from a nightmare. If that blood had been bright red Technicolor, it might have looked campy. In monochrome, it looks like oil. It looks heavy.
There's this specific shot of Madame Defarge—played by Rosalie Crutchley—knitting while the guillotine drops. It’s iconic. Crutchley doesn’t play her as a cartoon villain. She plays her as a woman who has had the humanity burned out of her by years of systemic abuse. You don't like her, but in this version, you kind of get why she’s so angry.
What most people get wrong about the ending
People remember the "Far, far better thing" speech. It’s the ultimate spoiler that everyone already knows. But what the a tale of two cities 1958 movie gets right is the pacing leading up to that moment.
✨ Don't miss: Shamea Morton and the Real Housewives of Atlanta: What Really Happened to Her Peach
The movie doesn’t rush the sacrifice. It spends time in the prison. It shows the small, quiet interactions between Carton and the little seamstress (played by Marie Versini). That relationship is the emotional heart of the final act. She’s the only person who sees Carton for who he truly is in his final hours. It’s not about Lucie Manette anymore. It’s about a man finding a shred of dignity in a world that has gone completely insane.
Key differences from the 1935 version
It is inevitable. If you love old movies, you’re going to compare this to the Ronald Colman version from 1935.
- Tone: The 1935 version is very "Old Hollywood." It’s grand and theatrical. The 1958 version is leaner and meaner.
- The Violence: The 1958 film shows more of the revolutionary fervor. It feels more dangerous.
- The Acting: Colman is great, but Bogarde feels more modern. He’s less "stagey."
Production trivia you probably didn't know
They filmed a lot of the exteriors in Bourges, France. The production team actually had to hide modern TV aerials and street signs to make the medieval streets look authentic. Bogarde reportedly loved the role but found the filming grueling because Thomas was a director who moved fast. They weren't lounging around in trailers; they were working.
The film also features a young Christopher Lee as the Marquis St. Evrémonde. This was right around the time he was becoming a star at Hammer Films. He is terrifyingly cold. When he tosses that coin after his carriage runs over a child, you can feel the entire audience’s blood boil. It’s a masterclass in how to play an aristocrat who doesn't even view poor people as the same species.
Why you should watch it right now
If you’re a student of film or just someone who likes a good story, the a tale of two cities 1958 movie is a lesson in economy. It clocks in at just under two hours. Think about that. Most modern "epics" are three hours long and still manage to miss the point. Thomas and his screenwriter, T.E.B. Clarke (who wrote The Lavender Hill Mob, strangely enough), managed to strip the book down to its skeletal structure without losing the soul.
🔗 Read more: Who is Really in the Enola Holmes 2 Cast? A Look at the Faces Behind the Mystery
It’s a story about cycles. The cycle of oppression, the cycle of revenge, and the only thing that can break it: a radical, self-sacrificing act of love.
Actionable insights for film lovers
If you are planning to watch this, don't just stream it on a tiny phone screen. The composition is too good for that.
- Look for the framing: Notice how often Sydney Carton is framed behind bars or in doorways even when he’s "free." The visual language of being trapped is everywhere.
- Compare the dialogue: If you’ve read the book, pay attention to how they modernized some of the Victorian "fluff" while keeping the famous lines intact.
- Watch Christopher Lee: This is one of his best non-horror performances. It shows the range he had before he became synonymous with Dracula and Saruman.
- Check the supporting cast: Look for Leo McKern (who played Rumpole of the Bailey) as the Attorney General. The British character actor bench was deep in the 50s.
The best way to experience this movie today is to find the digitally restored version. The grain is still there, but the clarity of the night scenes in Paris is night and day compared to the old VHS rips that used to circulate. It’s a bleak film, but it’s a necessary one. It reminds us that history is a circle and that sometimes, the only way to win is to give everything up.
Go find a copy. Dim the lights. Turn off your phone. Let the black-and-white shadows of 1958 take you back to 1789. It's a trip worth taking.