Honestly, Paul Feig shouldn’t have been the guy to make this. The man is the king of studio comedies like Bridesmaids and Spy. So when everyone heard he was directing A Simple Favor film, the collective industry eyebrow went up. People expected a romp. What they got instead was a neon-soaked, martini-drenched neo-noir that felt more like Hitchcock on a bender than a standard Friday night comedy. It’s been years since it hit theaters in 2018, yet it’s still the movie people pull out when they want to argue about "elevated" genre filmmaking.
The plot is a total fever dream. You have Anna Kendrick playing Stephanie Smothers, this pathologically cheerful mommy blogger who says "sorry" more than she breathes. Then comes Emily Nelson, played by Blake Lively, who is basically a walking Pinterest board of "cool girl" sociopathy. She drinks gin at noon, wears three-piece suits like a weapon, and disappears into thin air after asking Stephanie for a—you guessed it—simple favor.
It’s a weirdly specific movie. It manages to mock the suburban lifestyle while simultaneously being a deeply twisted thriller about identity theft, arson, and incest. Yeah, it goes there.
The Fashion Was a Character, Not Just a Costume
Most movies use clothes to tell you someone is rich or poor. In A Simple Favor film, the wardrobe is a tactical maneuver. Blake Lively famously worked with costume designer Renée Ehrlich Kalfus to create a look inspired by Paul Feig himself. All those suits? They weren't just for style. They were armor. Emily is a woman who has erased her past so many times that she needs a loud, undeniable present.
Stephanie’s evolution is the opposite. She starts in pom-poms and bright yellows—the visual equivalent of a scream for help. As she begins to inhabit Emily’s life, her clothes darken. She starts wearing the suits. It’s a classic "Double Indemnity" trope, but flipped on its head for the Instagram era. If you watch closely, the moment Stephanie starts to lie effectively is the moment she stops wearing prints.
📖 Related: Wrong Address: Why This Nigerian Drama Is Still Sparking Conversations
Why the "Mommy Vlogger" Subplot Actually Matters
We have to talk about the vlogging. It’s easy to dismiss Stephanie’s "Hi guys!" intro as a joke, but it’s actually the movie’s smartest engine. It grounds the high-stakes thriller in something incredibly mundane: the performance of motherhood. Stephanie uses her platform to seek validation because her real life is a mess of guilt over a past relationship with her half-brother (which, let's be real, is the darkest part of the whole script).
The internet is where the mystery actually gets solved. It’s not a gritty detective in a trench coat; it’s a group of suburban moms in the comments section and Stephanie’s own digital footprint. The film understands that in the 21st century, you can’t truly disappear if someone is looking for you on a 4G connection.
The Tonal Tightrope: Is it a Comedy or a Thriller?
This is where a lot of critics got tripped up. The movie is funny. It’s hysterical, actually. Andrew Rannells and the other "school gate" parents provide this Greek chorus of judgment that feels so real it hurts. But then, it pivots. One second you're laughing at a dry joke about a "Brother F***er" martini, and the next, you’re looking at a bloated corpse in a lake.
It’s tonally inconsistent on purpose. Life is like that. One minute you’re worrying about a playdate, the next you’re realizing your best friend might be a murderer. Feig leans into the camp. He uses French pop music—specifically Brigitte Bardot and Serge Gainsbourg—to give the American suburbs a sense of European chic and underlying rot.
👉 See also: Who was the voice of Yoda? The real story behind the Jedi Master
What Most People Get Wrong About the Ending
A lot of viewers think the ending is a bit too "neat." Stephanie wins, Emily goes to jail, and the husband, Sean (Henry Golding), is just... there. But look at the final frames. Stephanie didn't just survive; she transformed. She’s no longer the "lonely mom" looking for a friend. She’s a savvy content creator who used a tragedy to boost her numbers. She became the very thing she was investigating: a performer.
Emily, meanwhile, is playing basketball in prison. She’s still the alpha. She didn't "lose" in the psychological sense; she just changed venues. The movie suggests that both women are more alike than they’d ever admit. They are both manipulators; one just uses a smile while the other uses a snarl.
Let’s Talk About That Incest Twist
People forget how dark this movie actually is because it’s so brightly lit. The revelation that Stephanie’s son might have been fathered by her half-brother is a massive "WTF" moment. It’s handled with a strangely casual vibe that makes it even more disturbing. It explains why Stephanie is so desperate to be "perfect." She’s trying to outrun a scandal that would destroy her entire curated world. This isn't just a thriller; it's a study of how far people will go to keep their secrets buried under a layer of homemade lemon bars.
How to Lean Into the Aesthetic Today
If you’re revisiting A Simple Favor film or discovering it for the first time, there’s a whole lifestyle attached to it that people still obsess over on TikTok and Pinterest. The "Emily Nelson Aesthetic" basically kept the suit industry alive for three years.
✨ Don't miss: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
- Master the Martini: The "Emily Nelson" is specific. Frozen gin, a bit of vermouth, and a lemon twist. No ice in the glass. It’s cold, sharp, and slightly dangerous.
- French Noir Playlists: If you want to feel like you’re in a suburban conspiracy, put on "L'Anamour" by Françoise Hardy.
- The Power Suit: Invest in tailoring. The lesson Emily teaches us—before the whole "faking her own death" thing—is that if you look like you own the room, people will usually let you have it.
Moving Toward the Sequel
There’s been a ton of talk about A Simple Favor 2. We know Paul Feig is back. We know Anna Kendrick and Blake Lively are returning. The rumors say it’s set in Italy, which makes total sense. If the first movie was about the suffocating nature of the American suburbs, the second needs to be about the glamorous absurdity of the European elite.
The challenge will be capturing that same lightning in a bottle. You can't do the "secret past" thing twice. It has to be a new kind of mind game. But as long as the drinks are cold and the outfits are sharp, fans will be there.
Actionable Insight for Fans and Creators
If you're a storyteller or a filmmaker, the biggest takeaway from this movie is the "Genre Mashup." Don't be afraid to take a serious thriller and inject it with high-fashion comedy. The contrast makes both elements hit harder. For the casual viewer, the lesson is simpler: never trust a "simple favor," and always keep your gin in the freezer.
Start by re-watching the opening credits. Pay attention to the graphic design—it’s a direct homage to Saul Bass and the 1960s thrillers that paved the way for this weird, wonderful masterpiece. Then, look at your own "simple" friendships and wonder what’s really behind the suit.