If you pick up A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry, you should probably clear your schedule and maybe buy a box of tissues. Honestly, it’s a lot. It is a sprawling, 600-plus page epic that doesn't care about your feelings or your need for a happy ending. Set primarily in 1975 during the Emergency in India—a period of intense political upheaval and civil liberties crackdowns under Indira Gandhi—the novel tracks four strangers who end up crammed into a tiny flat.
It's grim. Really grim. But it’s also one of the most human things ever written.
People often ask why they should bother with a book that is famously depressing. The answer is pretty simple: Mistry writes with a level of empathy that makes the suffering feel like a shared burden rather than a spectacle. You aren't just reading about poverty or political corruption; you’re living in a cramped room with Dina, Ishvar, Om, and Maneck. You feel the heat. You smell the tea. You feel the crushing weight of a government that views human beings as statistics to be "beautified" or "sterilized."
The 1975 Emergency: Not Just a Backdrop
To understand the stakes of the story, you have to understand the history. In 1975, Prime Minister Indira Gandhi declared a State of Emergency. This wasn't just some legal technicality. It meant the suspension of elections and the jailing of political opponents. For the characters in the book, it meant the "Internal Disturbance" became an excuse for the state to bulldoze slums and force the poor into horrific sterilization camps.
Mistry doesn’t look away.
He focuses on the "City by the Sea"—basically Mumbai—where Dina Dalal, a widow struggling to keep her independence, hires two tailors, Ishvar and his nephew Om. They’ve fled horrific caste violence in their village, hoping the city offers a fresh start. They’re joined by Maneck, a student from the mountains who is struggling with his own sense of displacement.
These four characters are the heart of A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry. They are a makeshift family. They argue, they sew, they eat together, and they try to navigate a world that is actively trying to erase them.
📖 Related: Ashley Johnson: The Last of Us Voice Actress Who Changed Everything
Why the "Balance" Matters
The title isn't just a poetic phrase. It refers to the "fine balance between hope and despair." If you have too much hope, you get crushed when things go wrong. If you have too much despair, you can't survive the day. You have to walk a tightrope.
Take Ishvar and Om. They are members of the Chamaar caste—traditionally tanners and leatherworkers. In an attempt to escape the cycle of violence, they learn tailoring. This is a massive act of defiance against a rigid social hierarchy. But the city isn't the refuge they expected. They end up sleeping on the streets, dodging "beautification" squads that kidnap beggars to work on irrigation projects or face forced vasectomies.
It’s brutal.
Mistry’s prose is surprisingly plain. He doesn't use fancy metaphors to soften the blow. He describes a leg being amputated or a house being destroyed with the same steady, unflinching gaze. Some critics, like those at The New York Times when the book was first released in the mid-90s, argued that the book is almost "relentlessly" cruel. But is it? Or is it just honest about what happened to the most vulnerable people during that era?
Maneck and the Problem of Cynicism
While Ishvar and Om represent the physical struggle for survival, Maneck represents the psychological toll. He’s a sensitive kid. He remembers the beauty of his home in the Himalayas and can’t reconcile it with the filth and cruelty of the city.
He’s the one who struggles most with the "balance."
👉 See also: Archie Bunker's Place Season 1: Why the All in the Family Spin-off Was Weirder Than You Remember
Maneck’s trajectory is actually the most controversial part of the book for many readers. While the tailors find ways to keep laughing—even when they have nothing left—Maneck finds that his spirit is more fragile. It’s a stark reminder that trauma doesn't affect everyone the same way. Sometimes, the people who have the most "options" are the ones who find the world the most unbearable.
Fact vs. Fiction in Mistry’s World
While the characters are fictional, the events are terrifyingly real. The forced sterilization programs (nasbandi) were a core part of the Emergency, led by Sanjay Gandhi. Thousands of men were coerced or literally dragged into camps to meet quotas.
Mistry uses these historical facts to anchor the narrative. He doesn't need to invent villains; history provided them for him. The "Workman" or the "Motilal" types in the book represent the petty bureaucrats who kept the machinery of oppression running. They aren't monsters with horns; they’re just guys following orders and looking for a promotion.
That’s what makes the book so chilling. It’s the banality of the evil.
The Lasting Impact of the Novel
Why does this book still rank at the top of "must-read" lists decades later?
It’s the characters. By the time you get to the middle of the book, you aren't thinking about the "Emergency" as a historical event. You’re thinking about whether Om will get married or if Dina will lose her apartment. You care about them.
✨ Don't miss: Anne Hathaway in The Dark Knight Rises: What Most People Get Wrong
Mistry manages to capture the specific texture of Indian life—the slang, the food, the complex social codes—while making the story feel universal. It’s a story about the endurance of the human spirit. Even when the state takes their homes, their dignity, and their health, Ishvar and Om find a way to crack a joke.
They don't give up. Not entirely.
Common Misconceptions About the Book
People often think this is a "misery porn" book. It’s not.
If it were just a list of bad things happening, no one would finish it. The reason it works is the humor. There is a lot of dark, biting humor in the dialogue. The tailors are funny. Their bickering is legendary. Without that light, the darkness wouldn't be as effective.
Another misconception is that it’s an anti-India book. Actually, it’s a deeply patriotic book in its own way—it’s a critique of power, not the people. It’s a love letter to the resilience of the Indian working class.
Actionable Insights for Readers
If you’re planning to dive into this masterpiece, here is how to handle it:
- Read the Historical Context first: Spend ten minutes on Wikipedia looking up the 1975 Indian Emergency. It will make the political subplots much clearer.
- Don't rush the beginning: The first 100 pages are slow. They build the foundation. Stick with it until the four characters are finally under one roof.
- Check your mental health: Seriously. If you’re already feeling overwhelmed by the world, maybe wait a week. It’s heavy.
- Look for the "Small Victories": Pay attention to the moments when the characters share a meal or a joke. That’s where the "fine balance" lives.
- Compare it to the modern world: Notice how the themes of government overreach and the marginalization of the poor still resonate today.
A Fine Balance by Rohinton Mistry isn't a book you read for fun. It’s a book you read to be changed. It’s a massive, heartbreaking, beautiful achievement that reminds us why we tell stories in the first place—to make sure the people who were supposed to be forgotten are remembered forever.
To get the most out of your reading experience, track the character of Maneck specifically. His reaction to the world serves as a mirror for the reader's own sense of justice. When the book ends, don't look for a tidy resolution. Instead, reflect on the final images of the tailors; their survival is the ultimate act of resistance.