Let's be honest. When 300 Rise of an Empire hit theaters back in 2014, most people thought it was just a quick cash grab to ride the coattails of Zack Snyder's original masterpiece. It felt like a gamble. Following up on Gerard Butler’s iconic "This is Sparta" roar is basically an impossible task. But if you actually sit down and watch it—I mean really watch it—you realize it’s doing something much weirder and more ambitious than the first film. It isn't just a sequel. It's a "side-quel." It takes place before, during, and after the events of Leonidas at Thermopylae.
The movie is a fever dream of bronze and blood.
The plot pivots away from the dusty mountain passes of the first film and throws us onto the Aegean Sea. We follow Themistokles, played by Sullivan Stapleton, who is trying to unite a fractured Greece against the massive Persian navy. It’s a different vibe. While the Spartans were all about "glory in death," the Athenians in this movie are more about politics, strategy, and desperately trying not to drown.
The Eva Green Factor
We have to talk about Artemisia. Honestly, Eva Green didn't just play a character; she ate the entire movie. Without her, 300 Rise of an Empire would probably be a footnote in action cinema history. She plays the commander of the Persian navy with this terrifying, wide-eyed intensity that makes Xerxes look like a secondary character.
Artemisia is actually based on a real historical figure, Artemisia I of Caria. The real one was a queen who advised Xerxes during the Greco-Persian Wars. Of course, the movie cranks the "evil" dial up to eleven, turning her into a vengeful warrior who decapitates people and then kisses their heads. It's over-the-top. It’s camp. It’s exactly what the movie needed to survive the shadow of the original.
Themistokles, by comparison, is a lot more grounded. He’s not a king. He’s a politician who’s good with a sword. Stapleton plays him with a sort of weary pragmatism. He knows he's leading a bunch of "poets and sculptors" against a professional war machine. That dynamic creates a tension that the first movie didn't really have because the Spartans were already perfect soldiers. Here, you actually feel like the Greeks might lose because they’re just regular guys in boats.
🔗 Read more: Anjelica Huston in The Addams Family: What You Didn't Know About Morticia
That Iconic Visual Style
Noam Murro took over the director's chair from Zack Snyder, but the DNA is still 100% there. We’re talking about the "speed-ramping" technique. You know the one—where the action slows down to a crawl so you can see every drop of CGI blood, and then speeds up to a blur. It’s a comic book come to life.
The color palette changed, though. Where the first movie was all warm golds, sepia tones, and scorched earth, this one is drenched in deep blues, grays, and blacks. It feels colder. Wetter. The CGI water was actually a massive technical hurdle back then. They had to simulate these gargantuan naval collisions that looked stylized but felt heavy.
Historical Reality vs. Hollywood Fantasy
If you go into 300 Rise of an Empire looking for a history lesson, you’re going to have a bad time.
The Battle of Marathon, which kicks off the film, didn't actually happen the way it's shown. In the movie, Themistokles kills King Darius with an arrow from across a battlefield. In reality? Darius died of old age or illness years later. And the "God-King" transformation of Xerxes? Pure Frank Miller fantasy.
But does it matter? Not really. The film is an adaptation of Miller's graphic novel Xerxes, and it treats history like a buffet—taking the cool names and locations and leaving the boring logistics behind. The Battle of Salamis was a real naval engagement, and it really was a turning point for Western civilization. If the Greeks had lost there, the world would look fundamentally different today. The movie captures the stakes even if it fumbles the dates.
💡 You might also like: Isaiah Washington Movies and Shows: Why the Star Still Matters
Why the Naval Warfare Works
Most action movies struggle with sea battles. They’re often slow or confusing. But 300 Rise of an Empire uses the triremes like they’re tanks. They ram each other. They use fire. They use crazy boarding maneuvers.
There’s a specific scene where the Persian ships are chained together to create a floating battlefield. It’s visually stunning. It allows for that close-quarters combat we loved in the first movie while maintaining the scale of a massive sea war. The sheer scale of the Persian fleet is meant to feel suffocating.
One of the most interesting things about the Athenian approach to war in the film is the reliance on "free men." Themistokles spends a lot of time giving speeches about democracy. It's a bit on the nose, sure. But it provides a necessary contrast to the Spartan cult of war. These men have families and businesses to go back to. They’re fighting for a concept, not just a king.
The Problem With Being a Sequel
It’s hard to ignore the "Butler-sized" hole in the middle of this movie. Gerard Butler chose not to return, and his absence is felt. The film tries to compensate by bringing back Lena Headey as Queen Gorgo. She provides the emotional anchor. When she finally shows up on the deck of a ship with a sword at the end? It’s a genuine cheer-worthy moment.
But the movie struggles with its own pacing in the middle act. There’s a long sequence between Themistokles and Artemisia that feels a bit like it’s stalling for time. It’s visually striking, but it drags. You find yourself wanting to get back to the ships splintering into toothpicks.
📖 Related: Temuera Morrison as Boba Fett: Why Fans Are Still Divided Over the Daimyo of Tatooine
The Cultural Impact and Legacy
Looking back, this movie was part of a specific era of "stylized gore" that peaked in the early 2010s. It’s unapologetic. It doesn't try to be a prestige drama. It knows it’s a B-movie with a massive budget and A-list visual effects.
Interestingly, the film was a massive hit internationally, even if the domestic US box office was a bit softer than the original. It proved that the "300 brand" had legs, even without its primary star. It also solidified Eva Green as the go-to actress for "dangerously unhinged" roles.
People still debate which movie is better. The first one is a tighter, more cohesive story. It has a simplicity that works. But the second one is more expansive. It tries to show you the bigger picture of the Persian invasion. It shows you that while the 300 Spartans were dying at the Hot Gates, the rest of Greece was actually doing the heavy lifting to save their culture.
Practical Takeaways for the Action Fan
If you’re planning a rewatch or seeing it for the first time, keep these things in mind to get the most out of the experience:
- Watch them back-to-back: Since the timelines overlap, seeing the fall of Leonidas right before the Battle of Salamis makes the narrative feel much more cohesive.
- Focus on the background: The production design on the Persian ships is incredibly detailed. The Greek ships are functional and Spartan (no pun intended), while the Persian vessels are floating palaces of excess.
- Ignore the "History Channel" brain: Just accept the fantasy. This is a mythic retelling, like a story told by a drunk veteran around a campfire.
- Turn up the sound: The score by Junkie XL (Tom Holkenborg) is phenomenal. It uses heavy industrial beats and tribal drums that make the naval rams feel like they’re hitting you in the chest.
300 Rise of an Empire isn't trying to win an Oscar for Best Screenplay. It’s trying to show you the most violent, beautiful, and exaggerated version of the birth of democracy ever put to film. It succeeds because it leans into its own absurdity. It doesn't apologize for the capes, the speed-ramping, or the fact that everyone has a twelve-pack. It’s a spectacle in the truest sense of the word.
Next time you’re scrolling through a streaming service and see that blue-tinted poster, give it another shot. It’s a lot smarter than people give it credit for, especially in how it handles the character of Artemisia as a tragic, albeit murderous, figure of her time. The movie reminds us that legends aren't built by perfect people; they're built by the ones willing to do the messy work.
To really appreciate the filmmaking here, pay attention to the transition scenes between the land and sea. The way the camera swoops over the Greek landscape to find the hidden harbors is a masterclass in establishing scale. It makes the world feel interconnected, showing that the sacrifice at Thermopylae wasn't in a vacuum—it was the spark that allowed the navy to eventually win the day. That’s the real story of the film: the cost of buying just a little bit more time.