Ever wonder how far someone would go for a story? Most modern journalists just check Twitter or fire off an email. But back in 1887, Nellie Bly—a woman who basically invented the "stunt" reporting genre—convinced a judge she was insane just to get locked up. She wanted to see the inside of the Blackwell’s Island Insane Asylum. She got what she wanted. It was a nightmare. Fast forward to 2015, and we get 10 days in the madhouse movie, a low-budget indie attempt to capture that specific brand of Victorian-era horror. Honestly, it's a weird film. It’s clunky and sometimes feels like a stage play, but it tackles a piece of history that most of us would rather forget ever happened.
The movie stars Caroline Barry as Nellie, and she honestly carries the whole thing on her back. Most people go into this expecting a polished Hollywood thriller like Shutter Island. It isn't that. Not even close. It’s a gritty, often uncomfortable look at how society treated "difficult" women. If you weren't compliant, you were "mad." If you didn't speak English, you were "mad." If you were just poor and had no one to advocate for you? Yeah, you were definitely "mad."
The Brutal Reality Behind 10 Days in the Madhouse Movie
The film focuses heavily on the conditions Bly reported in her original articles for The New York World. We're talking about ice-cold baths, rancid food, and nurses who were more like prison guards than caregivers. Timothy Hines, the director, chose to lean into the melodrama, which some critics hated. But here’s the thing: the actual history was melodramatic. It was over-the-top cruel.
When Bly finally got inside the asylum, she realized that many of the women weren't actually mentally ill. They were immigrants. One character in the movie, Anne Neville, is based on a real person Bly met—a woman who was essentially sane but just physically ill and penniless. The movie highlights this tragedy. It’s not just about the "madness" of the patients; it's about the madness of the system that put them there.
Why the Cinematography Divides People
You’ll notice immediately that the movie has a very specific "look." It uses high-definition digital cameras in a way that makes everything look hyper-real, almost like you’re standing on the set. For some, this breaks the "movie magic." For others, it adds to the claustrophobia. It doesn't hide the dirt. It doesn't hide the sweat. It feels raw. This isn't a high-gloss production; it’s an indie film with a point to prove.
📖 Related: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
The pacing is also a bit erratic. Sometimes it lingers on a single conversation for five minutes, then jumps through two days of Bly’s imprisonment in a blur. But isn't that how trauma feels? Time loses all meaning when you're being fed gruel and told you're never leaving.
Christopher Lambert and the Supporting Cast
It was a bit of a shock to see Christopher Lambert—the Highlander himself—show up as Dr. E.C. Dent. He plays the superintendent of the asylum. His performance is interesting because he isn't a mustache-twirling villain. He's just... indifferent. That’s almost scarier. He represents the bureaucratic side of the abuse. The doctors were often too busy or too arrogant to actually check if the women they were "treating" were actually sick.
Kelly Le Brock also makes an appearance. Seeing these 80s and 90s icons in a 2015 period piece about the 1880s is surreal. It adds a layer of "wait, is that who I think it is?" which, strangely enough, fits the disorienting vibe of the asylum scenes.
The Historical Accuracy Factor
So, how much of 10 days in the madhouse movie is actually true? Surprisingly, a lot.
👉 See also: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
- The "Cold Bath" scene: This was a staple of the asylum. Women were stripped and doused in freezing water.
- The Food: Bly really did report that the bread was "black" and the butter was "rancid."
- The Verdict: The fact that Bly was declared "hopelessly insane" by several doctors after just a few minutes of observation is factual. It’s a terrifying indictment of Victorian medicine.
What Most People Get Wrong About Nellie Bly
People think she was just a "girl reporter" looking for fame. That’s a huge oversimplification. Bly was a pioneer. Before her, women in journalism were mostly relegated to writing about gardening or fashion. She wanted to write about the hard stuff. She wanted to change laws.
The movie does a decent job of showing her internal conflict. She has to keep up the "act" of being insane, but as the days go by, the environment starts to break her down. You start to wonder: how long can you pretend to be crazy in a place like that before the lines start to blur? The film doesn't answer this perfectly, but it makes you ask the question.
The Legacy of Blackwell’s Island
Today, Blackwell’s Island is called Roosevelt Island. If you go there now, you can see the Octagon—the remains of the asylum. It’s been turned into luxury apartments. There’s something deeply haunting about that. People are drinking lattes and doing yoga in the same footprint where women were once chained to benches.
The movie serves as a digital monument to those women. It’s not a perfect film—the acting can be stiff, and the lighting is sometimes too bright for a horror-adjacent story—but it’s an important one. It refuses to let the viewer look away from the institutionalized misogyny of the 19th century.
✨ Don't miss: Why Love Island Season 7 Episode 23 Still Feels Like a Fever Dream
A Different Kind of Horror
Most movies about asylums rely on ghosts or jump scares. 10 days in the madhouse movie doesn't need ghosts. The horror is purely human. It’s the sound of a key turning in a lock. It’s the realization that no one is coming to save you because the people who are supposed to save you are the ones who locked you up.
There’s a specific scene where Bly tries to tell the truth—she tells a doctor she’s actually sane and was just testing the system. He laughs at her. He takes her "confession" as further proof of her delusion. That’s the ultimate trap. Once you’re labeled, everything you do is filtered through that label.
Actionable Insights for Viewers and History Buffs
If you're planning to watch the film, or if you've already seen it and want to dive deeper into the real story, here is how you can actually engage with this history:
- Read the Original Series: Nellie Bly’s original articles were compiled into a book titled Ten Days in a Mad-House. It’s in the public domain. It’s a quick read and significantly more graphic than the movie. It provides the "Director's Cut" of what she actually experienced.
- Compare the Narrative: Watch the movie alongside the 2018 version, Escaping the Madhouse: The Nellie Bly Story, starring Christina Ricci. The Ricci version is more "Hollywood" and polished, but seeing both gives you a better sense of how different directors interpret the same historical trauma.
- Research the "Grand Jury" Aftermath: Don't stop at the end of the movie. Research what happened after Bly was released. Her reporting actually led to a grand jury investigation and a $1,000,000 increase in the budget for the Department of Public Charities and Corrections. She actually changed the world.
- Visit the Octagon: If you’re ever in New York City, take the tram to Roosevelt Island. Walking the grounds after watching the film makes the experience 100% more visceral.
The film might not win any Oscars for its technical merits, but it succeeds in being a loud, angry, and necessary reminder of where we’ve been. It’s a tribute to a woman who refused to stay in her lane and, in doing so, shone a light into the darkest corners of New York City.