If you tuned out after the first set of the men’s final, you probably thought you knew exactly how this was going to end. Carlos Alcaraz was doing Carlos Alcaraz things. He was sliding, hitting physics-defying winners, and looking every bit like the guy who was about to coast to a third straight title. But grass is a finicky surface, and momentum in SW19 is a fragile thing. By the time the sun started dipping over Centre Court, the narrative had flipped completely.
Jannik Sinner is who won Wimbledon this year on the men's side, and honestly, the way he did it was kinda terrifying for the rest of the tour.
It wasn't just a win; it was a statement. Sinner became the first Italian man to ever lift the singles trophy here. He did it by taking down the defending champ in a 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4 battle that lasted just over three hours. If you're looking for the short answer to who won Wimbledon this year, it's Jannik Sinner and Iga Świątek. But the "how" is where things get really interesting.
The Sinner Surge: Breaking the Alcaraz Streak
Everyone was talking about the "three-peat." Alcaraz hadn't lost a Grand Slam final in his entire career (5-0) going into that Sunday. He looked untouchable. When he took that first set 6-4, the "Alcaraz Era" felt like a foregone conclusion.
Then Sinner just... stopped missing.
Basically, Sinner turned himself into a wall. After that opening lapse, he didn't surrender a single break point for the rest of the match. Think about that for a second. Against perhaps the best returner in the game, he went three straight sets without even facing a break point. His serve was clicking at 125mph, and his baseline depth was so consistent it started to feel like a video game.
He didn't just beat Alcaraz; he out-grinded him on the surface Alcaraz was supposed to own.
Key Stats from the Men's Final
- Final Score: 4-6, 6-4, 6-4, 6-4
- Total Match Time: 3 hours and 4 minutes
- Sinner's Break Points Saved: 100% after the first set
- History Made: First Italian Wimbledon singles champion in the Open Era
Iga Świątek’s Historic "Double Bagel"
If the men’s final was a heavyweight boxing match, the women’s final was a clinical masterclass. Iga Świątek has always been the "Queen of Clay," but people have been skeptical about her grass-court game for years. She's heard the whispers. She's seen the tweets saying her extreme western forehand grip wouldn't hold up on the low-skidding lawns of London.
She silenced every bit of that noise this year.
Świątek faced Amanda Anisimova, the American who had a dream run to the final, including a massive upset over world No. 1 Aryna Sabalenka in the semis. But in the final, Iga was a different beast. She won 6-0, 6-0. A "double bagel." In a Wimbledon final.
It was the first time in 114 years that a Wimbledon final ended without the runner-up winning a single game. Honestly, it was almost hard to watch. Anisimova was clearly nervous, but Świątek was ruthless. She hit the lines with a precision that felt surgical. While most players struggle with the odd bounces on grass, Iga seemed to be playing on a hard court.
With this win, she’s now a six-time Grand Slam champion. At just 24 years old, she’s already moving into "all-time great" territory, especially now that she’s proven she can dominate on the green stuff too.
What Most People Missed: The British Doubles Joy
While the singles stars get the headlines, there was a massive moment for the home crowd that didn't get nearly enough love in the mainstream press.
Julian Cash and Lloyd Glasspool.
📖 Related: Did Mavs Win Last Night? The Real Story Behind the Final Score
They won the men's doubles title, and they did it as an all-British pair. That hasn't happened at Wimbledon since 1936. They took down the unseeded duo of Rinky Hijikata and David Pel in straight sets on Centre Court. If you were in the grounds that day, the roar was arguably louder than it was for the singles finals. It was one of those "I was there" moments for British tennis fans.
Why 2025 Felt Different
This year felt like a genuine changing of the guard. For the first time since 2002, none of the "Big Four" (Federer, Nadal, Djokovic, Murray) were in the final.
Novak Djokovic made a valiant run to the semifinals, but he was eventually dispatched by Sinner. It felt like the closing of a chapter. Djokovic’s 100th Wimbledon match win happened earlier in the tournament, a staggering achievement, but he couldn't quite find the gear needed to stop the youth movement this time around.
We also saw a ridiculous number of seeds fall early. By the end of the first round, 13 men's seeds were out. That's a record for the Open Era. It made the draw chaotic and wide open, which is exactly why someone like Anisimova (seeded 13th) or even a qualifier like Oliver Tarvet could make such a splash.
Realities of the Grass Season
One thing you've gotta realize is that the grass season is incredibly short. These players have about four weeks to transition from the sliding, high-bouncing clay of Paris to the fast, slick turf of London.
Sinner’s victory was actually rooted in his heartbreak at the French Open. He lost a five-set marathon to Alcaraz in Paris just a month earlier. His coach, Darren Cahill, noted that Sinner used that loss as fuel. Instead of moping, he went straight to the grass courts and worked on a shorter, more compact backswing to handle the speed of the ball.
It worked.
Alcaraz, on the other hand, admitted he struggled with the pressure of the "three-peat" towards the end. Even the best in the world are human. He played incredible tennis for most of the fortnight, but against a guy as locked in as Sinner, a 5% drop in intensity is a death sentence.
Actionable Insights for Tennis Fans
If you're looking to follow the momentum of this year's winners, keep an eye on these specific trends as we move into the hard-court swing:
- The Sinner/Alcaraz Rivalry is the New Standard: These two are currently playing a different sport than everyone else. Expect them to be the 1-2 seeds for the foreseeable future.
- Iga's "Grass Mental Block" is Gone: Now that she knows she can win on grass, the "Calendar Slam" (winning all four majors in one year) is a very real possibility for her in 2026.
- Watch the Italians: Between Sinner, Jasmine Paolini, and Flavio Cobolli, Italian tennis is in a golden age. They are training differently and it shows in their movement.
- The Serve is Back: Sinner won this tournament because of his serve. In an era of baseline grinding, having a "free point" weapon on grass is still the ultimate cheat code.
What to Watch Next
The tour doesn't stop. Most of these players are heading straight to North America for the hard-court season. Keep your eyes on the ATP/WTA 1000 events in Canada and Cincinnati. That’s where we’ll see if Sinner can maintain this #1 ranking or if Alcaraz finds his revenge on the quicker hard courts.
If you want to dig deeper into the stats, the official Wimbledon site has the full point-by-point breakdown of the finals. It’s worth looking at the "unreturned serve" percentages—that’s really where Sinner won the match.
👉 See also: Packers vs The Bears: What Really Happened to the NFL's Oldest Grudge
The 2025 championships gave us a glimpse into the next decade of tennis. It’s faster, it’s more aggressive, and for the first time in twenty years, it doesn't belong to the old guard.
Next steps:
- Check the upcoming ATP/WTA schedules to see where Sinner and Świątek are playing next.
- Review the updated world rankings, as Sinner has now solidified a massive lead at the top.
- Watch the match highlights of the Świątek final if you want to see what "perfection" looks like on a tennis court.