It was the most dangerous year in American history. No exaggeration. By the time the summer of 1860 rolled around, the United States wasn't just "divided"—it was basically two different countries sharing a single border and a whole lot of resentment. People weren't just arguing about taxes or infrastructure. They were arguing about whether the guy in the next state over was allowed to own human beings.
So, who were the candidates in the election of 1860? If you're looking for a simple list of names, you've got Abraham Lincoln, Stephen A. Douglas, John C. Breckinridge, and John Bell. But just listing them doesn't tell the real story. This wasn't a normal four-way race. It was a chaotic, fragmented explosion of political parties that literally couldn't agree on a single reality.
Honestly, the election was more like two separate regional contests happening at the same time. In the North, it was Lincoln vs. Douglas. In the South, it was Breckinridge vs. Bell. Because the Democratic Party—the only party that had a footprint in both regions—decided to set itself on fire right before the finish line, the whole thing fell apart.
The Rail-Splitter from Illinois: Abraham Lincoln
Abraham Lincoln didn't even expect to be the nominee. He was the dark horse. The Republican Party was still relatively new, and most people thought William H. Seward, a powerhouse from New York, had it in the bag. But Seward had too much baggage. He’d talked about an "irrepressible conflict," which scared the moderates.
Lincoln was different. He was viewed as a moderate who could actually win the "Lower North" states like Indiana and Pennsylvania. He wasn't an abolitionist in the way we think of them today—he didn't campaign on ending slavery everywhere immediately—but he was firm on one thing: slavery could not expand into the new Western territories.
The Republicans ran a brilliant campaign. They called him "Honest Abe" and the "Rail-Splitter." They leaned hard into his "pull-yourself-up-by-your-bootstraps" vibe. To the South, though, he was a radical revolutionary. He was so unpopular in the slave states that his name wasn't even on the ballot in ten of them. Imagine trying to win a national election when you aren't even an option for a third of the country. He did it anyway.
📖 Related: What Really Happened With Trump Revoking Mayorkas Secret Service Protection
A Party Divided: Stephen A. Douglas and the Northern Democrats
If you want to know why the Civil War became inevitable, look at the Democratic National Convention in Charleston. It was a disaster. The party couldn't agree on a platform regarding slavery in the territories.
Stephen A. Douglas, known as the "Little Giant," was the leading Democrat. He pushed a concept called Popular Sovereignty. Basically, he thought the people living in a territory should vote on whether to allow slavery. Sounds democratic, right? Well, it ticked off everyone. Southerners hated it because it meant slavery could be banned. Northerners hated it because it meant slavery could be allowed.
When the convention failed to reach a consensus, the Southern delegates literally walked out. They eventually held their own convention and nominated their own guy. This left Douglas as the nominee for the Northern wing of the party. He was the only candidate who tried to campaign in both the North and the South, but he was exhausted and increasingly desperate. He knew what was coming. Toward the end of the race, he stopped campaigning for votes and started campaigning for the Union, begging people to stay loyal to the country regardless of who won.
The Southern Choice: John C. Breckinridge
The Southern Democrats wanted someone who would protect "Southern rights" without compromise. They chose John C. Breckinridge, the sitting Vice President under James Buchanan. At 39, he’s still the youngest VP in American history.
Breckinridge wasn't a fire-breathing secessionist by nature, but he represented the wing of the party that demanded a federal slave code. They wanted the government to explicitly protect slavery in every single territory, no matter what the local population wanted. This was the exact opposite of Douglas’s popular sovereignty.
👉 See also: Franklin D Roosevelt Civil Rights Record: Why It Is Way More Complicated Than You Think
When we talk about who were the candidates in the election of 1860, Breckinridge is the one who really highlights the regional fracture. He swept the Deep South. For many Southerners, a vote for Breckinridge was a vote for their entire way of life. They felt that if Lincoln won, their economy and social structure would be annihilated.
The "Can't We All Just Get Along?" Party: John Bell
Then there was the Constitutional Union Party. This was a group of "Old Line Whigs" and members of the "Know-Nothing" party who were terrified of the country splitting in two. They nominated John Bell from Tennessee.
Their platform was incredibly simple—and arguably totally useless. They basically said, "The Constitution, the Union of the States, and the Enforcement of the Laws." They avoided the slavery issue entirely. They didn't want to talk about it. They just wanted everyone to stop fighting.
Bell did surprisingly well in the "border states" like Virginia, Kentucky, and Tennessee. These were places where people knew that if a war broke out, it would be fought in their backyards. They were desperate for a middle ground that no longer existed.
How the Math Actually Worked
Lincoln won because he swept the North. He didn't need a single Southern vote. Because the North had a much larger population, its electoral weight was massive.
✨ Don't miss: 39 Carl St and Kevin Lau: What Actually Happened at the Cole Valley Property
- Abraham Lincoln: 180 electoral votes (1.8 million popular votes)
- John C. Breckinridge: 72 electoral votes (848,000 popular votes)
- John Bell: 39 electoral votes (590,000 popular votes)
- Stephen A. Douglas: 12 electoral votes (1.3 million popular votes)
Check out that Douglas stat. He had the second-highest popular vote total but finished dead last in the electoral college. His support was spread out everywhere, but he wasn't popular enough in any single place to win many states. It’s a classic example of why the electoral college makes third-party (or fourth-party) runs so difficult.
Why This Matters to You Today
The 1860 election wasn't just a historical quirk. It was the moment the American political system failed to find a compromise. When the results came in, South Carolina didn't even wait for the inauguration. They saw Lincoln's victory as a "declaration of war" against their institutions.
If you're looking for actionable insights from this mess, look at how the media and political rhetoric of the time fueled the fire. In 1860, people were getting their news from highly partisan newspapers that didn't even try to be objective. Sound familiar? The lesson here is that when communication breaks down and regional identity becomes more important than national identity, the "checks and balances" we rely on start to crumble.
What to Do Next
To really understand the weight of this election, you should look into the specific debates that led up to it.
- Read the 1860 Party Platforms. Don't just take a historian's word for it. Look at what the Republicans and the Southern Democrats actually wrote down. You'll see two completely different visions of what America was supposed to be.
- Trace the Electoral Map. Look at a map of the 1860 results and compare it to a modern political map. While the parties have swapped names and ideologies in many ways, the geographic "sorting" of American politics has some eerie similarities.
- Visit a Civil War Battlefield. If you're near a place like Gettysburg or Antietam, go. Standing where the consequences of this election played out physically changes how you view a ballot box.
The candidates of 1860 weren't just names in a textbook. They were men caught in a storm that none of them could fully control. Lincoln's victory was a turning point that led to the end of slavery, but the cost was a war that claimed over 600,000 lives. Understanding who these men were helps us understand why that cost was paid.
Next Steps for Deepening Your Knowledge:
- Research the Dred Scott Decision of 1857 to see why the legal system was already failing before the election.
- Examine the Lincoln-Douglas Debates of 1858 to see the intellectual groundwork for the 1860 campaign.
- Investigate the Crittenden Compromise, the last-ditch effort to stop secession after Lincoln was elected.