The year was 632. Medina was reeling. The Prophet Muhammad had passed away, and for a moment, the entire community felt like it was teetering on the edge of total collapse. Imagine the sheer weight of that vacuum. People were confused, grieving, and frankly, terrified about what came next. There was no manual for this. No pre-written constitution for a post-prophetic world. Amidst this chaos, one man stepped into the gap. His name was Abu Bakr as-Siddiq.
When people ask who was the first khalifa, they aren't just asking for a name to put on a history quiz. They're asking about the guy who saved the nascent Islamic state from self-destructing within weeks of its leader’s death. Abu Bakr wasn't some distant political figure; he was the Prophet's closest friend, his father-in-law, and the man who stood by him when everyone else in Mecca thought he was crazy.
His election wasn't a pre-ordained coronation. It was a tense, localized meeting at a place called Saqifah Bani Sa’idah. There was arguing. There were different tribal factions—the Ansar (the locals of Medina) and the Muhajirun (the migrants from Mecca)—each with their own ideas about leadership. Abu Bakr didn’t even nominate himself initially. But his reputation for being "As-Siddiq" (The Truthful) and his calm demeanor made him the natural choice to bridge the divide.
Why the First Khalifa matters more than you think
It’s easy to look back 1,400 years and think this was all inevitable. It wasn’t. If the wrong person had been chosen, or if no one had been chosen at all, the entire movement might have just faded into a footnote of Arabian history.
Abu Bakr’s reign lasted only about two years. That’s it. Just two years, from 632 to 634 CE. But what he packed into those twenty-four months is kind of insane. He didn't just inherit a peaceful kingdom; he inherited a firestorm. Several tribes across the Arabian Peninsula decided that their loyalty ended with the Prophet’s life. They stopped paying taxes (Zakat) and started following various "self-proclaimed" prophets. This period is known as the Ridda Wars, or the Wars of Apostasy.
If Abu Bakr had been a weaker man, he might have compromised. He might have said, "Okay, don't worry about the taxes, let's just keep the peace." He didn't. He realized that the integrity of the community depended on its unity. He sent out eleven different columns of soldiers to bring the peninsula back together. It was a massive gamble. And it worked. By the time he passed away, the Arabian Peninsula was more unified than it had ever been under a single political authority.
The humble lifestyle of a leader
There’s this image of a "Khalifa" (Caliph) as a grand emperor on a gold throne. Abu Bakr was the opposite. Before he became the leader, he was a successful cloth merchant. Once he took office, he actually tried to keep running his business. Can you imagine the head of state walking to the market with a bundle of clothes on his shoulder to make ends meet?
👉 See also: How is gum made? The sticky truth about what you are actually chewing
Eventually, the community leaders had to tell him, "Look, you can't be the Khalifa and a street vendor at the same time. We need you full-time." They gave him a very modest stipend from the public treasury—just enough to feed his family. On his deathbed, he actually ordered that any leftover funds from his salary be returned to the state. He didn't want to owe the people a single dirham.
He lived in a simple house. He wore simple clothes. He was famous for going out into the outskirts of Medina in the middle of the night to help an old, blind woman with her chores, without ever telling her who he was. This wasn't "PR." There were no cameras. It was just who he was.
Addressing the "Ali vs. Abu Bakr" debate
We have to talk about the elephant in the room. If you look into who was the first khalifa, you'll immediately run into the historical tension between the supporters of Abu Bakr and the supporters of Ali ibn Abi Talib, the Prophet's cousin and son-in-law.
This is the root of the Sunni-Shia split.
Sunni Muslims believe that Abu Bakr was the rightful first successor based on his seniority, his role leading prayers during the Prophet’s final illness, and the consensus (ijma) of the companions at Saqifah. They point to the Prophet’s preference for Abu Bakr in various religious matters as a clear sign.
Shia Muslims, however, believe that Ali was divinely appointed by the Prophet at a place called Ghadir Khumm. They argue that the meeting at Saqifah happened while Ali was busy with the Prophet's funeral arrangements, effectively bypassing the rightful heir.
✨ Don't miss: Curtain Bangs on Fine Hair: Why Yours Probably Look Flat and How to Fix It
Honestly, both sides have deep, complex theological and historical arguments that have lasted for centuries. From a purely historical administrative standpoint, Abu Bakr was the one who actually held the office and governed. He was the one recognized by the state apparatus of the time. Regardless of where you land on the "rightfulness" of the appointment, his impact on the survival of the early Islamic state is a historical fact that both sides generally acknowledge in terms of its sheer scale.
The Compilation of the Quran
One of the most important things Abu Bakr did—which affects billions of people today—was the initial gathering of the Quran into a single written volume.
During the Prophet's life, the Quran was written on whatever was handy: bits of parchment, flat stones, shoulder blades of camels, and pieces of leather. Most people just memorized it. But during the Ridda Wars, specifically at the Battle of Yamama, a lot of the "Huffaz" (those who had memorized the entire Quran) were killed.
Umar ibn al-Khattab, who would later become the second Khalifa, got worried. He went to Abu Bakr and said, "We’re losing the people who carry the Quran in their hearts. If we don't write this down in one place, we might lose parts of it."
Abu Bakr was hesitant at first. He famously asked, "How can I do something that the Messenger of Allah did not do?" But eventually, he saw the necessity. He commissioned Zayd ibn Thabit, one of the Prophet's primary scribes, to collect everything. Zayd was incredibly meticulous. He wouldn't accept a verse unless it was written down in the presence of the Prophet and verified by two witnesses who had heard it directly from him. That original manuscript was kept with Abu Bakr, then passed to Umar, and eventually formed the basis for the standardized version we see today.
Key traits that defined his rule
- Decisiveness: When the tribes rebelled, he didn't flinch.
- Mercy: He issued strict codes of conduct for his armies. They weren't allowed to kill women, children, or the elderly. They couldn't cut down trees or kill livestock except for food.
- Loyalty: His entire life was defined by his "Siddiq" nature—his unwavering belief in the message he followed.
How Abu Bakr’s reign ended
Abu Bakr didn't rule for long. He fell ill in August 634. Unlike the chaotic uncertainty that followed the Prophet's death, Abu Bakr wanted to ensure a smooth transition. He consulted with the senior companions and nominated Umar ibn al-Khattab as his successor.
🔗 Read more: Bates Nut Farm Woods Valley Road Valley Center CA: Why Everyone Still Goes After 100 Years
He died at the age of 63 and was buried right next to the Prophet Muhammad in Medina. To this day, if you visit the Prophet's Mosque, you can see their resting places side-by-side.
It’s kind of wild to think about. He was only in power for about 27 months. In that time, he crushed rebellions, unified a peninsula, started the process of compiling the most-read book in the world, and launched the expeditions that would eventually see the Byzantine and Sassanid empires lose ground to the new Caliphate.
Why this history matters today
Understanding who was the first khalifa isn't just about ancient history. It’s about understanding the DNA of Islamic governance and the origins of one of the world's major religions. It teaches us about leadership under pressure and the importance of personal integrity.
Abu Bakr’s life reminds us that leadership isn't always about being the loudest person in the room. It’s often about being the most stable one. He was a man of few words, but his actions basically paved the way for everything that followed in the Islamic world.
If you're looking to dive deeper into this period, the best way to start is by looking at the primary sources—the early chronicles like those of Tabari or Ibn Hisham. They provide the gritty, human details that often get polished away in modern retellings.
Practical steps to learn more:
- Compare the Perspectives: Read both a Sunni and a Shia account of the events at Saqifah. It’s the only way to truly grasp the nuance of the historical tension.
- Study the Ridda Wars: Look into the specific tribes and their motivations. It wasn't always about religion; often, it was about tribal autonomy and taxes.
- Visit Historical Sites: If you ever have the chance to visit Medina, the geography of these events—the Prophet's Mosque and the site of Saqifah—brings the history to life in a way a book never can.
- Read the "Sermon of the Caliphate": Find the text of Abu Bakr's first speech after being elected. It’s incredibly short and focuses on the idea that he should only be followed as long as he follows the truth. It's a masterclass in humble leadership.
The story of the first Khalifa is ultimately a story of a friend trying to honor the legacy of his teacher while the world around him was trying to tear itself apart. He succeeded, and in doing so, he changed the course of human history forever.