If you’ve spent any time scouring the wikis or re-watching the early seasons of Hulu’s adaptation of The Handmaid’s Tale, you might have stumbled across a name that feels familiar but frustratingly out of reach: Commander Bell.
He isn't Fred Waterford. He isn't Lawrence.
Honestly, he’s one of those characters who exists more in the peripheral vision of the Gilead power structure than in the spotlight of the main plot. Yet, his presence—or rather, the presence of his household—serves as a crucial piece of the world-building puzzle that Margaret Atwood and the showrunners used to establish just how bleak June Osborne’s reality really was. You’ve probably seen his name mentioned in casting calls or deep-dive Reddit threads, but tracking down his actual impact on the story requires a bit of a detective's eye for detail.
Why We Rarely See Commander Bell on Screen
The thing about Gilead is that it’s a massive, bureaucratic nightmare. For every "celebrity" commander like Waterford or Pryce, there are dozens of mid-level officials who keep the gears of the totalitarian machine grinding. Commander Bell is essentially the archetype of the invisible oppressor.
In the television series, the "Bell" name is most notably associated with a Handmaid who isn't June. Think back to the atmosphere of the Red Center or the earlier market scenes. The naming convention in Gilead is brutal: Of-[Commander's Name]. When we meet an "Ofbell," we are seeing the direct shadow cast by Commander Bell.
It's a weirdly effective narrative trick. By showing us the Handmaids but keeping the Commanders in the background, the show emphasizes that these men are interchangeable cogs in a system of structural violence. It doesn't matter if Bell is a "kind" man or a monster; his title alone defines the existence of the woman forced to carry his name.
The Lore of the Commander Class
To understand where a guy like Commander Bell fits in, you have to look at the hierarchy established in the 2017 series and the original 1985 novel. Commanders are the elite. They are the "Sons of Jacob."
📖 Related: Wrong Address: Why This Nigerian Drama Is Still Sparking Conversations
But they aren't all equal.
- High Commanders: These guys sit on the Council and make the big decisions (think Commander Winslow or Commander Lawrence).
- Regional Commanders: They run local districts and handle the day-to-day enforcement of the Law of God.
- Economic/Bureaucratic Commanders: This is likely where someone like Commander Bell resides—the administrative backbone that handles things like logistics, trade, or the "Colonies" oversight.
Most fans get tripped up because they expect every named Commander to have a massive showdown with June. That’s just not how this world works. Some of them are just... there. They are the neighbors. They are the men nodding at Fred in the hallways of the Soul Scrolls shop.
The "Ofbell" Connection: A Glimpse into the Household
In the early seasons, the character of Ofbell provided a stark contrast to June's rebellious streak. While the show primarily follows June (Offred), the surrounding Handmaids represent different ways of coping with trauma.
When we see the Handmaid assigned to Commander Bell, we aren't seeing a person; we’re seeing a reflection of his status. In Gilead, a Handmaid is a status symbol. It’s like a luxury car that also happens to be a human being. The fact that Bell has a Handmaid tells us he’s in the top 1% of the Gilead social strata.
You’ve got to remember that most people in Gilead are "Econopeople." They live in cramped apartments and don't have servants. If you’re a Commander with a Handmaid, you’ve made it. You’re part of the inner circle.
Why Do People Keep Searching for Him?
Basically, there’s a lot of confusion because of how many "Commanders" are mentioned in passing. Sometimes a character is mentioned in a script or a background document but never gets a major close-up.
👉 See also: Who was the voice of Yoda? The real story behind the Jedi Master
Fans often confuse Commander Bell with other minor antagonists. It’s easy to do. All these guys wear the same charcoal suits. They all have the same self-important strut. But Bell represents the "everyman" of the ruling class. He is the banality of evil personified. He isn't the one orchestrating the grand escapes or the public executions; he's the one signing the requisitions for the rope.
The Reality of Gilead’s Leadership Structure
If you look at the historical parallels Margaret Atwood used to build this world—like the 17th-century Puritans or various 20th-century authoritarian regimes—the "Commanders" are based on real-world cadres.
In these systems, names like Commander Bell are vital for maintaining the illusion of a broad, unified front. If the only Commanders were the ones we see on screen, the resistance (Mayday) would have ended the war in a week. The reason Gilead is so hard to topple is because there are hundreds of "Bells" lurking in the background.
- Social Isolation: Commanders rarely socialize outside their rank.
- Uniformity: The strict dress code hides individual personality, making men like Bell seem like a monolithic force.
- Power Dynamics: The wives, like Serena Joy, are often the ones who define the "vibe" of the household, while the Commanders focus on the "Great Work" of the state.
What This Means for the Final Seasons
As The Handmaid’s Tale moves toward its conclusion and transitions into The Testaments (the sequel series), the focus is shifting away from individual Commanders and toward the total collapse of the system.
Characters like Commander Bell are starting to feel the heat. The cracks in Gilead aren't just at the top; they are in the mid-tier. When the economy fails or the border with Canada becomes too porous, these secondary Commanders are usually the first ones to turn on each other.
Honestly, the "Bells" of Gilead are probably terrified right now. They don't have the protection of being a High Commander, but they're high-profile enough to be hanged if a revolution happens. They are stuck in the middle.
✨ Don't miss: Not the Nine O'Clock News: Why the Satirical Giant Still Matters
How to Spot Details You Missed
If you’re doing a re-watch, keep an eye on the background during the large gatherings—like the Prayvaganzas or the Salvagings. The production design in the show is insane. They often use nameplates or seating charts that feature the names of these "invisible" Commanders.
It’s a fun (if slightly depressing) game to see how many times you can spot a reference to Commander Bell or his household. It adds a layer of realism to the show. It reminds us that June isn't just fighting one man; she’s fighting an entire phone book of men who all believe they have a God-given right to own her.
Actionable Insights for Fans and Writers
If you’re a fan of the show or someone writing about it, don’t ignore these minor characters. They are the key to understanding the scope of the story.
- Analyze the Naming Conventions: Pay attention to the "Of-" names in the background. They tell you which Commanders are currently in favor and who has been granted "biological assets."
- Look for the Bureaucracy: Gilead isn't just a cult; it's a government. Understanding the roles of mid-tier guys like Commander Bell helps you see how the state actually functions on a Tuesday morning, not just during a crisis.
- Note the Silent Compliance: The most terrifying thing about the Commander class isn't their shouting—it's their silence. They go to work, they come home to their stolen families, and they act like everything is normal. That’s the real horror.
To truly grasp the world of The Handmaid's Tale, you have to look past the main villains. You have to look at the men who are content to sit in the back of the room. Commander Bell might not have a redemption arc or a dramatic death scene, but he is a vital part of the architecture of June’s prison. He is the reason the system stays standing as long as it does.
When you see a Handmaid on screen, remember the name she carries isn't just a label; it's a tether to a man like Bell, who is doing everything in his power to ensure she never becomes "June" again. That is the fundamental tragedy of the story.