You've probably sat through a high school English class where a teacher pointed at a grainy picture of a bust—a bearded, blind guy—and said, "This is Homer." They told you he wrote The Iliad and The Odyssey. Case closed. But if you actually dig into the history of who made the odyssey, you find out that the answer is basically a 3,000-year-old cold case that still drives historians absolutely wild.
It wasn't just a guy sitting down with a quill.
Honestly, the "Homer" we talk about might not have even existed as a single person. While the name is attached to these epic poems, the reality is a messy, beautiful, and complicated evolution of oral tradition that spanned centuries before it ever hit a piece of papyrus. Think of it more like a massive, ancient game of telephone, but the players were the most talented poets in the Mediterranean.
The Blind Poet vs. The Committee
For a long time, the standard answer to who made the odyssey was simply Homer. Legend says he was a blind bard from Ionia (modern-day Turkey). But here's the kicker: we have zero contemporary records of his life. None. Everything we "know" about him was written hundreds of years after he supposedly lived.
This sparked what scholars call the "Homeric Question."
In the 18th century, a guy named Friedrich August Wolf shook things up by suggesting that these epics weren't the work of one genius, but a collection of shorter songs stitched together. It's a bit like a "Best Of" album where nobody is quite sure who the original band members were. This group of thinkers, known as Analysts, believed the inconsistencies in the text—like a character dying and then showing up in the next scene alive—were proof that multiple authors were involved.
🔗 Read more: Blink-182 Mark Hoppus: What Most People Get Wrong About His 2026 Comeback
On the other side, you’ve got the Unitarians. They argue that the structure of The Odyssey is way too tight and the themes are too consistent for it to be a random mashup. They think one master architect, one "Homer," took the raw materials of myth and forged them into a masterpiece.
Milman Parry and the Oral Tradition Break-through
In the 1930s, a Harvard scholar named Milman Parry changed the game forever. He didn't look at the library; he looked at living traditions. He went to Yugoslavia and listened to illiterate bards who could recite poems thousands of lines long.
He noticed they used "formulas."
Whenever the sun rises in The Odyssey, it's "rosy-fingered Dawn." Whenever Athena shows up, she’s "grey-eyed Athena." This wasn't because Homer lacked a thesaurus. These were mental building blocks. They allowed a poet to improvise in real-time while keeping the rhythm (dactylic hexameter) intact. This discovery suggests that who made the odyssey isn't a "who" so much as a "how." The Greek people made it, collectively, over generations of singing in mead halls and marketplaces.
Why It Matters That We Don't Know
If we knew exactly who wrote it, some of the magic might evaporate. The mystery allows the poem to belong to everyone. The Odyssey isn't just a story about a guy named Odysseus trying to get home; it’s a repository of Greek values, fears, and survival tactics.
💡 You might also like: Why Grand Funk’s Bad Time is Secretly the Best Pop Song of the 1970s
Scholars like Gregory Nagy from Harvard suggest that the "Homer" we imagine is actually the end result of a long process of "pan-Hellenization." Basically, different regions had their own versions of these stories. Eventually, as Greece became more unified, these versions merged into the definitive texts we have today. The "Homer" we credit was likely the last great performer or the scribe who finally nailed the words down in the 8th or 7th century BCE.
- It wasn't written for the page.
- It was composed for the ear.
- The rhythm was the most important part.
- It was meant to be performed over several nights.
Imagine a world with no Netflix. No books. Just a guy with a lyre and a voice, telling you about monsters and gods. That's the environment that "made" the poem.
The Phoenician Connection and the Alphabet
We also have to talk about the tech. Around the 8th century BCE, the Greeks borrowed the Phoenician alphabet and added vowels. This was a massive upgrade. Before this, writing was mostly for boring stuff like accounting and inventory.
Someone—let's call him the "Primary Editor"—realized this new technology could preserve the ephemeral songs of the bards. This person, or group of people, is arguably who made the odyssey in the form we recognize. Without that specific technological leap, the oral tradition would have eventually morphed into something else or died out entirely. It’s the difference between a live concert and a studio recording.
The Role of Women in the Epic
There’s a fascinating, if controversial, theory put forward by Samuel Butler in the late 1800s. He argued that The Odyssey was actually written by a woman. He pointed out that while The Iliad is all about war and "guy stuff," The Odyssey is obsessed with domestic life, weaving, and the internal lives of women like Penelope and Nausicaa.
📖 Related: Why La Mera Mera Radio is Actually Dominating Local Airwaves Right Now
While most modern scholars don't buy the "authoress" theory entirely, they do acknowledge that the poem is uniquely empathetic toward female characters. It suggests the creator was someone—man or woman—who lived outside the pure warrior-culture that birthed The Iliad.
What We Can Actually Prove
The truth is sort of in the middle. Most experts today agree that there was likely one "final" poet who took the massive wealth of oral material and gave it its specific shape, pacing, and emotional core.
Whether his name was Homer doesn't really change the impact of the work. We see the influence of this "whoever" in every "hero's journey" story told since. From Star Wars to The Lord of the Rings, the DNA of The Odyssey is everywhere. It’s the blueprint for the survivor.
- Check the internal evidence. Notice the "bronze age" weapons mixed with "iron age" tools. This proves the story was updated by different creators over time.
- Look at the geography. The poet clearly knew the Ionian coast better than the actual islands of Ithaca, which suggests the "who" was someone from the eastern side of the Aegean.
- Respect the performance. Remember that the poem was meant to be heard. If you read it out loud, the repetitions make sense. They aren't "filler"; they are the beat.
If you want to get closer to the person who made the odyssey, stop reading it as a dusty textbook. Listen to a good translation—like the one by Emily Wilson—which captures the grit and the pace of the original Greek. The "who" isn't a name on a cover. It's the voice that survives every time the story is told.
The best way to honor the creator is to engage with the text as a living thing. Look for the "formulas" next time you read. Notice how the poet uses Odysseus's craftiness as a mirror for the poet's own skill. By understanding the oral roots, you move past the myth of the "lone genius" and see the epic for what it really is: a monumental achievement of human memory and collective imagination. It wasn't made by one man in a vacuum; it was made by a culture that refused to let its stories die.