It is a question that has broken friendships, sparked global protests, and dominated the evening news for decades. You’ve probably seen the shouting matches on social media. One side screams about settler colonialism and apartheid; the other yells about terrorism and the right to exist. If you’re looking for a simple "yes" or "no" to who is in the wrong Israel or Palestine, you’re basically asking for a map of a minefield. It’s messy. It’s painful. And honestly, it’s a conflict where two different people claim the exact same piece of earth for very different—but deeply felt—reasons.
By early 2026, the situation has only become more layered. After the catastrophic violence that began in October 2023, the region is struggling through a fragile ceasefire and a "peace plan" that many experts, like those at the Stimson Center, fear might be "Westbankification" of Gaza. The death toll in Gaza has passed 70,000, and the trauma on both sides is so deep it feels generational. To understand who is "wrong," we have to stop looking for a villain in a comic book and start looking at the legal, historical, and human reality on the ground.
The Case Against the Status Quo
If you look at international law, the argument that Israel is "in the wrong" often centers on the occupation. In July 2024, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) dropped a massive legal hammer. They issued an advisory opinion stating that Israel’s presence in the occupied Palestinian territory is unlawful. They didn't mince words. The court said Israel is in breach of the prohibition on racial discrimination and apartheid.
Think about that for a second.
The highest court in the world basically said the entire setup—the settlements in the West Bank, the checkpoints, the dual legal systems—violates fundamental human rights. For Palestinians, being "right" is about the right to self-determination. They’ve been living under military rule for over half a century. Imagine not being able to visit your cousin ten miles away because of a permit regime you didn't vote for. That’s the daily reality in the West Bank.
💡 You might also like: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
Then there’s Gaza. Even with the current ceasefire, the destruction is mind-boggling. Human Rights Watch and other groups have pointed to the use of starvation as a weapon of war and the systematic leveling of neighborhoods. By January 2026, over 2,500 buildings have been demolished since the ceasefire was supposed to start. Critics argue that even if you have a right to defend yourself, you don't have a right to make a place unlivable for two million people.
The Security Dilemma: Israel’s Argument
Now, flip the script. From the Israeli perspective, the question of "who is in the wrong" starts and ends with security. They look at October 7, 2023—where 1,200 people were killed and hundreds taken hostage—as proof that they are fighting an existential threat. If you’re an Israeli parent living near the border, your "right" is the right not to be murdered in your bed.
The Israeli government argues that Hamas, which ruled Gaza for years, used civilian infrastructure—schools, hospitals, homes—to hide rockets and tunnels. This is the "human shield" argument. In their eyes, the high civilian death toll isn't a choice; it’s a tragic consequence of fighting an enemy that doesn't wear uniforms and wants to destroy their state.
They also point to the fact that every time they’ve withdrawn from territory—like Gaza in 2005—they’ve been met with more rockets, not less. It creates a "damned if you do, damned if you don't" mentality. If they leave the West Bank, will it become another launchpad for attacks? That fear drives the right-wing policies of leaders like Benjamin Netanyahu and Itamar Ben Gvir, who argue that only "total victory" or total control can keep Jews safe.
📖 Related: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number
Key Points of Contention in 2026
To understand the friction, you’ve got to look at the specific "tinderboxes" that keep the fire going:
- Settlements: There are now over 500,000 Israeli settlers in the West Bank. These aren't just tents; they are full cities with malls and highways. Palestinians see this as a slow-motion land theft that makes a future state impossible.
- Jerusalem: Both claim it as their capital. Specifically, the Temple Mount (Haram al-Sharif). It’s the holiest site in Judaism and the third holiest in Islam. A single riot there can start a regional war.
- The Right of Return: Millions of Palestinians are refugees. They want to go back to the homes their families left in 1948. Israel says "no way," because that would end the Jewish majority of the country.
- Hamas vs. Fatah: The Palestinians are split. Hamas (in Gaza) has historically rejected Israel's existence, while Fatah (the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank) recognizes Israel but is seen by many Palestinians as corrupt and powerless.
Is There a "Right" Side?
Kinda. But also, no.
Historians like Avi Shlaim argue that the power imbalance is so skewed that you can't treat this as a fight between equals. Israel has one of the world's most advanced militaries and the backing of the U.S. Palestinians have no state, no army, and limited movement. In this view, the "wrong" side is the one maintaining an illegal occupation.
On the flip side, proponents of Israel argue that you cannot expect a country to commit national suicide by ignoring groups that explicitly call for its destruction. They argue that the "wrong" lies with the leadership on both sides—Palestinian leaders who have turned down past peace offers and Israeli leaders who have expanded settlements to the point of no return.
👉 See also: When Does Joe Biden's Term End: What Actually Happened
The truth is, 2026 has brought us to a weird, dark place. The "Peace Plan" ratified by the UN Security Council in late 2025 talks about a path to statehood, but it doesn't have many teeth. It relies on a "Board of Peace" and an "International Stabilization Force" that includes countries like Indonesia and Azerbaijan. But meanwhile, the Israeli cabinet is still approving new settlements in the West Bank.
What Actually Happens Next?
If you’re trying to figure out who is in the wrong Israel or Palestine, the most honest answer is that the system is broken. The international community has spent thirty years talking about a "two-state solution" while the ground for that solution literally disappears under new construction and rubble.
The human cost is what really matters now. We're looking at a generation of children in Gaza who have lost everything and a generation of Israelis who feel more isolated and fearful than ever.
To move forward, the focus has to shift from "who started it" to "how do we stop it." This means:
- Enforcing International Law: If the ICJ says the occupation is illegal, there has to be a consequence. Without accountability, the cycle just repeats.
- Addressing the Humanitarian Crisis: Gaza needs a massive, Marshall-Plan-style reconstruction that isn't just about food but about dignity and political agency.
- Ending Settler Violence: The rise in radical settler attacks in the West Bank, often documented by Israeli NGOs like B'Tselem, has to be stopped by the Israeli government itself.
- A Real Path to Sovereignty: Palestinians cannot be expected to live in a "technocratic" limbo forever. There has to be a date on the calendar for actual statehood.
Instead of picking a side like it’s a football game, start looking at specific policies. Support organizations that work on the ground for human rights, like Amnesty International, B'Tselem, or Al-Haq. Follow journalists who are actually in the West Bank and Gaza rather than just pundits on TV. Understanding the nuance won't solve the war, but it's the only way to stop the spread of the misinformation that fuels it.