It is early. Honestly, it’s beyond early. We are sitting in January 2026, and the next time Americans head to the polls to pick a president isn't for another 1,000-plus days. But if you’ve spent any time looking at the political chatter lately, you know the "shadow campaign" is already in full swing. People are obsessed with who is in the lead for presidential election cycles that haven't even officially started yet.
The 2024 dust has settled, but the machinery never stops. We’re seeing a fascinating, somewhat chaotic scramble for position. Right now, the "lead" is a moving target made of name recognition, betting odds, and very early primary polling.
The Early Front-Runners: Newsom and Vance Take Center Stage
If you look at the raw data coming out of early 2026, two names keep popping up at the top of the pile: California Governor Gavin Newsom and Vice President J.D. Vance.
Recent polling from late 2025 and early 2026 suggests Newsom has carved out a narrow but consistent lead among Democratic voters. A Yahoo/YouGov survey placed him at 21%, just hairsbreadth ahead of Kamala Harris at 19%. It’s basically a statistical tie, but Newsom’s "Campaign for Democracy" PAC has been a fundraising juggernaut, pulling in over $100 million for various causes. That kind of cash doesn't just sit there; it builds a national infrastructure.
On the Republican side, J.D. Vance is currently the person to beat. Betting markets like Polymarket and Kalshi have him with roughly a 28% chance of winning the whole thing in 2028. Within his own party, his support is even more concentrated. YouGov data shows a staggering 44% of Republicans consider him their "ideal" 2028 nominee.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Air France Crash Toronto Miracle Still Changes How We Fly
Breaking Down the Democratic Bench
- Gavin Newsom: Leading with roughly 21-23% in primary preference polls. His strength is his massive fundraising network and high visibility.
- Kamala Harris: Hovering around 19%. She remains a powerhouse with the base but faces some "disappointment" metrics in certain demographics.
- Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez: She’s the wild card. Polling around 7-9%, she has massive "consideration" numbers—meaning people are open to her even if she isn't their first choice yet.
- The "Governors" Club: Josh Shapiro, Wes Moore, and Gretchen Whitmer are all in the single digits, but they are the names political insiders watch for a "breakout" moment.
Why Polls This Early are Kinda Unreliable
Let’s be real for a second. Asking who is in the lead for presidential election 2028 right now is like asking who will win the Super Bowl in three years based on high school recruiting classes. It's a vibe check. Nothing more.
Polls right now are almost entirely driven by name ID. That’s why you see someone like "The Rock" (Dwayne Johnson) popping up with 4% in betting markets. It’s not because he has a policy platform on trade with China; it's because everyone knows who he is.
Voters are also currently focused on the 2026 midterms. Gallup recently reported that 45% of Americans now identify as Independents—a record high. This means the traditional "lead" for any party is incredibly fragile. Most people are more worried about the price of eggs or whether the House will flip this November than who will be inaugurated in 2029.
The Trump Factor and Ineligible Candidates
One of the weirdest things about the current "who's leading" conversation is the presence of people who can't even run. Donald Trump shows up in some 2028 odds at around 3%. He’s constitutionally barred from a third term, yet his influence is so heavy that some people still bet on him.
🔗 Read more: Robert Hanssen: What Most People Get Wrong About the FBI's Most Damaging Spy
Elon Musk is another one. He shows up with about 1% odds despite the "natural-born citizen" requirement. This tells you that the "lead" isn't just about math; it's about the cultural gravity of certain figures. They pull the conversation toward them even when they aren't on the ballot.
The Rise of the Far Right Internationally
It's worth looking at what's happening outside the US to see the mood. In Portugal’s 2026 presidential race, André Ventura and the Chega party have been surging, showing a global trend toward anti-establishment candidates. While it's not a direct 1-to-1 with the US, these "vibes" tend to cross oceans.
The Midterm Litmus Test
You can't talk about who is in the lead for presidential election 2028 without looking at the 2026 midterms. This is the real-world trial.
If Republicans hold the House and Senate, J.D. Vance’s path becomes much smoother. If Democrats overperform—as they did in recent special elections in places like Virginia and Iowa—the Newsom/Harris/Shapiro camp gets a massive boost of "electability" points.
💡 You might also like: Why the Recent Snowfall Western New York State Emergency Was Different
Voters right now are signaling a deep desire for stability. According to a Minot Daily News report, the electorate is "allergic to chaos." Whoever can project "competence" over "theatrical politics" is going to eventually take a real lead, regardless of what the betting markets say today.
What You Should Watch Next
If you want to track who is actually gaining ground, ignore the national "head-to-head" polls for a few months. Instead, watch these three things:
- PAC Fundraising Totals: Money doesn't vote, but it buys the staff that gets people to vote. Watch the Q1 2026 filings for Newsom’s "Campaign for Democracy" and Vance-aligned groups.
- The 2026 Midterm Results: If a specific wing of either party wins big in November 2026, their preferred 2028 candidate will instantly become the front-runner.
- The Independent Shift: With 45% of the country identifying as Independent, watch which candidate starts talking about "common sense" and "stability" rather than just "red meat" for the base.
Right now, J.D. Vance and Gavin Newsom have the "lead" on paper, but the real race starts the day after the midterms. Stay skeptical of anyone claiming a "sure thing" this far out.
Actionable Insights for Political Junkies
To stay ahead of the curve, stop looking at "who is in the lead for presidential election" headlines and start tracking state-level approval ratings for governors like Shapiro (PA) and Whitmer (MI). These states decide the presidency. If their numbers stay high through 2026, they are the real threats to the current front-runners. Additionally, monitor the Federal Election Commission (FEC) filings for new Leadership PACs; often, a candidate's intent is signaled by where they are spending "travel" money long before they ever hold a press conference in Des Moines.