Betting on the Vatican is a bit like betting on the wind. You think you know where it’s blowing, then suddenly, a door slams shut in a marble hallway and everything changes. Right now, everyone is asking who is going to be the next pope, but if you listen to the chatter in the cafes around the Borgo Pio, you’ll realize that the "favorites" often end up being the ones who walk into the conclave as popes and walk out as cardinals.
The stakes in 2026 are massive. We aren't just talking about a change in management. We're talking about the soul of a two-thousand-year-old institution that is currently split between those who love Pope Francis’s "field hospital" approach and those who think the Church has become a bit too... well, messy.
Honestly, the "frontrunners" change every time a cardinal has a cough or publishes a book. But there are a few names that keep coming up. You’ve probably heard of Cardinal Tagle or Cardinal Parolin. But do they actually have a shot? Let's get into the weeds of the real power players and the weird rules that will decide the next Bishop of Rome.
The "Asian Francis" vs. The Diplomat
If you want a continuation of the current vibe, you look at Cardinal Luis Antonio Tagle from the Philippines. People call him "Chito." He’s got this youthful energy, he’s known for literally crying with the poor, and he’s a communications powerhouse. He’s basically the "Asian Francis."
But there's a catch.
Some of the older, more "Roman" cardinals think he’s a bit too emotional. They worry he might not have the "teeth" to fix the Vatican’s nightmare-level bureaucracy. Then you have Cardinal Pietro Parolin. He’s the Vatican Secretary of State. Basically the Prime Minister. He’s Italian, he’s a brilliant diplomat, and he’s seen as a "safe" choice. If the cardinals want someone who knows where all the bodies are buried but won't start a revolution, Parolin is the guy.
He’s the ultimate "continuity" candidate, but some people are still annoyed about the secret deal he brokered with China. In the Vatican, a "secret deal" is usually a recipe for losing votes when the doors of the Sistine Chapel lock.
📖 Related: Trump Approval Rating State Map: Why the Red-Blue Divide is Moving
The Hungarian Dark Horse: Péter Erdő
If the pendulum swings back toward tradition, Cardinal Péter Erdő of Hungary is the name on everyone’s lips. He’s a canon lawyer. Very brainy. He’s the kind of guy who can cite obscure 14th-century church law while drinking an espresso.
He appeals to the "law and order" crowd.
- He’s a "friendly traditionalist."
- He’s well-liked by the European bishops.
- He’s young enough to have a long reign but old enough to have gravitas.
The problem? He’s seen as being a bit too close to the Hungarian government. In a church that’s trying to stay global, being linked to local nationalism can be a "kiss of death" for a papal candidate.
Why 2026 feels different
It’s about the College of Cardinals. Francis has "packed" the college—and I don't mean that in a bad way, he’s just appointed a huge majority of the guys who will actually be voting. He’s picked men from places like Mongolia, South Sudan, and the Amazon.
These guys don't care about Italian politics.
They care about climate change, poverty, and how to keep their churches open when there’s a war next door. This makes predicting who is going to be the next pope almost impossible because we don't know how a cardinal from a tiny island in the Pacific is going to vote compared to a cardinal from Chicago.
👉 See also: Ukraine War Map May 2025: Why the Frontlines Aren't Moving Like You Think
The "Street Priest" and the Peace Envoy
Cardinal Matteo Zuppi is another one to watch. He’s the Archbishop of Bologna. He’s been Francis’s point man for peace talks in Ukraine. He’s got that "street priest" vibe but he’s also very connected to the Sant'Egidio community—a powerful lay group that does a lot of back-channel diplomacy.
Zuppi is liked because he’s nice. Like, genuinely nice. In a world of high-stakes church politics, being the guy everyone likes is a huge advantage.
The "Great Surprise" Factor
Remember 2013? Nobody was saying "Jorge Bergoglio."
The Italian press was obsessed with Cardinal Scola. The Americans were hoping for Cardinal Dolan. Then, white smoke, and out comes a guy from Argentina who likes to ride the bus.
The conclave has a way of humbling the experts. There’s an old Roman saying: "He who enters the conclave a Pope, leaves a Cardinal." It basically means if you’re the favorite, you’re doomed. The moment you become the frontrunner, everyone starts looking for reasons to vote against you.
Maybe the next pope will be Cardinal Fridolin Ambongo Besungu from the Democratic Republic of Congo. Or Cardinal Pierbattista Pizzaballa, the Latin Patriarch of Jerusalem, who has been a voice of reason in the middle of a literal war zone.
✨ Don't miss: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
What to look for when the smoke starts
- The first two ballots: These are usually "protest votes" where cardinals honor their friends.
- The "Third Day" shift: If a candidate hasn't emerged by day three, the cardinals usually start looking for a compromise candidate.
- The Name: The name they choose tells you everything. If they pick "Pius," we're going back to tradition. If they pick "Francis II," the revolution continues. If they pick "John XXIV," expect a move toward unity.
Actionable insights for following the race
If you're trying to stay ahead of the curve on who is going to be the next pope, don't just look at the betting odds. Those are mostly driven by people who don't actually know how the Church works.
Instead, look at the consistories. Look at who the current Pope is giving the big jobs to. Look at who is being sent to handle the most difficult diplomatic missions. The guys who are trusted with the "messy" jobs are usually the ones being tested for the top spot.
Keep an eye on Cardinal Robert Prevost. He’s an American-born cardinal who spent years in Peru. He’s now in charge of the office that picks all the world’s bishops. That is a massive power base. He’s a "bridge" candidate—half American, half Latin American, fully Vatican-trained.
Ultimately, the choice will come down to a group of men locked in a room, praying and arguing until two-thirds of them can agree. It’s the world’s oldest democratic process, and it’s also the most unpredictable.
To stay informed, watch the "Vaticanisti"—the specialized journalists in Rome like John Allen Jr. or those at The Tablet. They know which cardinals are having lunch together, and in the Vatican, lunch is where the real voting happens.
Pay attention to the age bracket. Cardinals usually want someone who will last at least 10 years but not 30. Anyone between 65 and 72 is in the "sweet spot." Anyone older is a "transitional" pope. Anyone younger is a "generational" risk.
The next few months will be filled with rumors. Take them with a grain of salt. The Holy Spirit might have a plan, but the Cardinals usually have a shortlist, and those two things don't always match up until the very last second.