If you ask a random person who invented color tv first, you’re probably going to get a blank stare or maybe a guess about RCA. Honestly, the answer isn’t just one guy in a lab with a "Eureka!" moment. It was more like a decades-long, multi-national bar fight involving patents, spinning wheels, and some really angry corporate executives.
Television didn't just "turn on" one day in Technicolor. It was a slow, agonizing crawl from grainy black-and-white silhouettes to the vibrant screens we have now. People were dreaming of color before they even had working black-and-white sets. Imagine that. You're looking at a flickering box that can barely show a human face, and you're already thinking, "Yeah, but what if his tie was red?"
The Scotsman who got there way before everyone else
John Logie Baird. Remember that name. In 1928—years before most people even knew what a "television" was—this Scottish inventor pulled off the world's first color transmission. It wasn't digital. It wasn't even electronic in the way we think of it. Baird used a mechanical system. He had these spinning discs with spirals of apertures, each covered with filters for the primary colors.
It was clunky. It was loud. But on July 3, 1928, it worked.
He showed off a flickering image of a basket of strawberries and a bunch of flowers. Think about the tech of 1928. Most people were still getting used to the idea of the "talkies" in movie theaters. Baird was literally light-years ahead, yet his mechanical system was ultimately a dead end. Mechanical TV just couldn't scale. You can't have a giant spinning wheel in your living room forever. Eventually, the physics of spinning metal hits a wall. You need electrons.
The Mexican teenager who changed the game
While the big corporations in the US were duking it out, a 17-year-old in Mexico City was busy filing a patent that would actually stick. Guillermo González Camarena is a name that doesn't get enough credit in American textbooks. In 1940, he invented the "Trichromatic Sequential Fields System."
Basically, he figured out a way to make color work using an adapter that could be fitted onto existing black-and-white sets. He was a kid. Well, barely twenty. He didn't have the backing of a massive conglomerate like Sarnoff at RCA or Paley at CBS. But his system was so effective that NASA eventually used a variation of it for the Voyager mission to take photos of Jupiter and Saturn. Talk about a legacy.
🔗 Read more: Finding an OS X El Capitan Download DMG That Actually Works in 2026
His first color broadcast in Mexico happened in 1946 from his own lab, XE1GC. If you’re looking for who invented color tv first in terms of a practical, adaptable system that didn't require a whole new infrastructure, Camarena is your guy.
The RCA and CBS war that almost broke TV
The 1950s in America were chaotic. The FCC (Federal Communications Commission) was stuck in the middle of a brutal corporate war. On one side, you had CBS. They had a system that looked great. The colors were rich. The problem? It wasn't "compatible."
If CBS broadcasted in color, anyone with a black-and-white TV saw... nothing. Just static.
RCA, led by the ruthless David Sarnoff, hated this. They wanted "compatible" color. They wanted a signal that would show up as black-and-white on old TVs but in full color on new, expensive RCA sets. Sarnoff poured millions—literally over $100 million—into research. He was obsessed. He called color TV "the most complex instrument ever to be brought into the home."
The FCC actually approved the CBS system first in 1950. CBS won! Or so they thought. Then the Korean War happened. The government banned the production of color sets to save materials for the war effort. This gave RCA the breathing room they needed to perfect their electronic system. By the time the ban was lifted, RCA had a better, compatible system ready to go. In 1953, the FCC flipped their decision. RCA’s NTSC (National Television System Committee) standard became the law of the land.
Why the first color TVs were a total flop
The RCA CT-100. It came out in 1954. It cost $1,000.
💡 You might also like: Is Social Media Dying? What Everyone Gets Wrong About the Post-Feed Era
To put that in perspective, in 1954, you could buy a decent car for about $1,500 to $2,000. Imagine paying half the price of a car for a 15-inch screen where most of the shows were still in black and white anyway. It was a disaster. Dealers couldn't give them away. People called color TV "the rich man's toy" and honestly, they weren't wrong.
The turning point wasn't a piece of hardware. It was Walt Disney’s Wonderful World of Color in 1961. When Disney moved his show to NBC (which was owned by RCA) and started broadcasting in color, people finally had a reason to buy the sets. That, and the "living color" peacock logo. Marketing won where engineering had stalled.
Peter Goldmark and the lost CBS system
We have to talk about Peter Goldmark. He was the genius at CBS who developed that initial mechanical-electronic hybrid that the FCC liked so much. He was a cellist. He was a perfectionist. He hated the "dot crawl" and artifacts in the RCA system.
The nuance here is that while RCA "won" the battle for the living room, Goldmark’s ideas lived on in specialized fields. Medical schools used his color systems for years to broadcast surgeries in high detail. It was better tech, just worse business. This happens a lot in the history of technology. The best version doesn't always win; the most compatible version does.
How to identify a true "first" in color TV
If you're trying to win a trivia night, you have to be specific about what "first" means.
- First experimental transmission: John Logie Baird (1928).
- First patent for a modern system: Guillermo González Camarena (1940).
- First FCC-approved system: CBS (1950).
- First commercially viable/compatible system: RCA (1953).
- First national color broadcast: The Tournament of Roses Parade (January 1, 1954).
It’s a timeline of increments. There is no single "inventor" sitting on a throne. It was a relay race where everyone was trying to trip each other.
📖 Related: Gmail Users Warned of Highly Sophisticated AI-Powered Phishing Attacks: What’s Actually Happening
The global perspective: PAL vs SECAM
While America was fighting over NTSC (which engineers jokingly called "Never Twice the Same Color" because the hues shifted so much), Europe was doing its own thing. Germany developed PAL (Phase Alternating Line). It was technically superior to the American system because it fixed the color-shifting issues automatically.
France, being France, developed SECAM. They wanted their own thing. By the 1960s, the world was divided into these three technical camps. It’s why you couldn't take a VHS tape from London and play it in New York without a special converter. The "invention" of color TV actually resulted in a fragmented world for nearly fifty years.
Why this history still matters for your 4K OLED
Everything we do now—HDR, 8K, Dolby Vision—stems from those early fights. The struggle to fit "extra" data (color) into a "narrow" pipe (the signal) is the fundamental challenge of all media.
When you see a "vibrant" red on your phone, you're seeing the result of the trichromatic theories that Camarena and Goldmark were obsessed with. We’ve just replaced spinning discs and vacuum tubes with microscopic light-emitting diodes.
Real-world insights for the curious
If you want to actually see this history in person or dig deeper into how color changed the world, here is what you should do next:
- Visit a museum with a CT-100: If you’re ever in Maryland, the Early Television Museum in Hilliard, Ohio (it's actually in Ohio, not Maryland—my mistake there) has working models. Seeing a 1954 color set in person makes you realize how far we haven't come. The colors are surprisingly warm.
- Look up the "Rose Parade" footage: You can find clips of the 1954 Rose Parade online. It was the first time the American public saw a live color broadcast of a major event. It looks primitive now, but at the time, it was like seeing a ghost come to life.
- Check your TV settings: Most people have their "Color" or "Saturation" turned up way too high because we are still chasing that "wow" factor that RCA used to sell sets in the 50s. If you want accuracy, look for "Filmmaker Mode." It’s the closest thing to what the creators intended before the marketing departments got ahold of it.
- Read "Tube" by David E. Fisher: If you want the gritty details of the Sarnoff vs. Farnsworth and CBS vs. RCA wars, this is the definitive book. It reads like a corporate thriller.
Color TV wasn't a gift; it was a hard-fought victory of engineering over the limitations of the physical world. It took thousands of people to make that strawberry in 1928 look like a strawberry on your screen today.