Ever wonder why nobody can give you a straight answer about who established the church in Rome? Seriously. You’d think the most famous church in the world would have a clear "Founder" plaque right by the front door of St. Peter's Basilica. But it doesn't work that way. History is messier than a Sunday brunch.
The short answer? We don't actually know his or her name.
That’s a bit of a letdown, isn't it? We want a hero. We want a single date. We want a ribbon-cutting ceremony. Instead, what we have is a group of nameless, ordinary people—merchants, travelers, and perhaps even soldiers—who brought a radical new "Eastern" faith into the heart of the Empire long before any Apostle showed up. By the time the big names like Paul and Peter arrived, the party was already in full swing.
The Invisible Founders
Most folks assume Peter or Paul started it. It makes sense, right? They are the "Pillars of the Church." But when Paul wrote his Epistle to the Romans around 57 AD, he hadn't even been to Rome yet. Think about that for a second. He was writing a massive, complex theological letter to a community that was already flourishing. He mentions people like Priscilla and Aquila—Jewish Christians who had been kicked out of Rome by Emperor Claudius and then moved back.
These people were the real deal. They were "tentmakers." They were middle-class workers. They moved along the Roman roads for business, and as they moved, they talked. The church in Rome wasn't "established" by a decree; it was leaked. It was a grassroots movement that trickled into the capital through the Jewish synagogues of the Trastevere district.
History suggests that the initial spark likely happened shortly after Pentecost in Jerusalem. The Book of Acts mentions "visitors from Rome" (both Jews and converts to Judaism) were present during that massive event. These visitors went home. They didn't wait for a permit. They just started telling their neighbors about a guy named Jesus who changed everything.
💡 You might also like: Why the Blue Jordan 13 Retro Still Dominates the Streets
Peter and Paul: The Reinforcers, Not the Founders
So, if they didn't start it, why do we associate them so closely with the question of who established the church in Rome?
Well, because they gave it structure. They gave it "apostolic authority."
If the nameless travelers were the ones who laid the bricks, Peter and Paul were the ones who designed the roof and made sure the walls didn't fall down. Peter eventually made his way to Rome, likely in the early 60s AD, though some traditions place him there earlier. The Roman Catholic Church views Peter as the first Bishop of Rome, which is a massive part of their identity. But "establishing" an organization and "starting" a community are two different things.
Paul arrived as a prisoner. Even in chains, he was influential. He spent two years under house arrest, preaching to anyone who would listen. He basically turned his prison cell into a satellite office for the Gospel. Between the two of them, they solidified the Roman church's reputation, eventually dying there as martyrs under Nero. Their blood, quite literally, became the "seed" of the church, as Tertullian would later famously say.
The "Chrestus" Riot of 49 AD
Here is a piece of evidence that usually gets skipped in Sunday school. Around 49 AD, Emperor Claudius expelled all Jews from Rome. Why? The Roman historian Suetonius says it was because of "constant disturbances at the instigation of Chrestus."
📖 Related: Sleeping With Your Neighbor: Why It Is More Complicated Than You Think
Most historians agree "Chrestus" was a misspelling of Christus (Christ).
This means that by 49 AD—nearly a decade before Paul wrote his letter—the debate over Jesus was already so loud and so disruptive in the Roman synagogues that the Emperor got annoyed and kicked everyone out. That is a massive clue. It proves that the community was established, vocal, and influential enough to cause a civic disturbance long before the "Founding Fathers" of Christianity set foot in the city.
Why It Matters Who Started It
You might be thinking, "Who cares? It's just a trivia question."
Actually, it changes how we see history. If the Roman church was started by ordinary people, it means the spread of Christianity wasn't just a top-down phenomenon led by charismatic superstars. It was a "viral" movement in the truest sense of the word. It was a lifestyle that people found so compelling they carried it across borders like contraband.
The Roman church was unique because it didn't have a single "mother" church or a single founding father. It was a messy collection of house churches. They met in dining rooms. They met in warehouses. They were a diverse mix of Jews and Gentiles, which actually caused a lot of the friction Paul had to address in his letters.
👉 See also: At Home French Manicure: Why Yours Looks Cheap and How to Fix It
Debunking the Myths
Let’s get real about some of the common misconceptions regarding who established the church in Rome:
- Myth 1: Peter founded it in 42 AD. Some early traditions (like those from Eusebius) suggest Peter went to Rome early on. Most modern scholars find this unlikely given the timeline in the Book of Acts.
- Myth 2: It was a formal institution from day one. Nope. It was a loose network. No Vatican, no cathedrals, no fancy hats. Just people sharing bread.
- Myth 3: Paul was the first leader. Paul was a missionary and a strategist. He respected the Roman church but he didn't "own" it. He was more of an invited guest who stayed a long time.
The Impact of the Roman Environment
Rome was a melting pot. It was the "sink of the world," where every new religion and philosophy ended up. For the early Christians, this was both a blessing and a curse. It meant they could blend in for a while, but it also meant they were competing with dozens of other "mystery religions" like Mithraism.
The fact that this specific group—the one following a crucified carpenter from a backwater province—ended up taking over the capital is, frankly, statistically impossible. But they did. And they did it without a central headquarters for the first century of their existence.
Practical Insights and Next Steps
If you are researching the origins of the Roman church for historical or personal reasons, don't just look at the big names. The story of who established the church in Rome is a story of the "little guys."
- Read Romans 16. It’s a boring list of names to most people, but it’s actually a "Who's Who" of the people who were actually doing the work on the ground. You'll see names like Phoebe, Andronicus, and Junia.
- Look into the archaeological sites of the Roman house churches. Search for "Tituli"—these were the original locations where Christians met in private homes before they were allowed to build public churches.
- Compare the accounts. Check out what Tacitus and Suetonius said about early Christians in Rome. It provides a "secular" view that balances the biblical narrative.
The establishment of the church in Rome wasn't a single event. It was a slow-motion takeover. It started with a few travelers whispering in a synagogue and ended with the most powerful empire in history bowing its knee. Whether you're looking at it through a lens of faith or a lens of sociology, the "bottom-up" nature of its founding is the most fascinating part of the story.
To understand the Roman church, stop looking for a founder and start looking at the community. That is where the real history is hidden.