It’s been decades, but the question of who did OJ Simpson kill still triggers heated debates at dinner tables and across social media. You’ve likely seen the grainy footage of the white Bronco or heard the "if it doesn't fit, you must acquit" line a thousand times. But if we strip away the Hollywood drama and the legal gymnastics, the core of the story remains two people who lost their lives on a summer night in Brentwood.
Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman.
Those are the names. They aren't just characters in a true-crime documentary; they were real people. Nicole was 35. Ron was only 25. Their deaths on June 12, 1994, sparked a media circus that basically changed how we consume news forever. While a criminal jury found OJ Simpson "not guilty" in 1995, a civil jury later found him liable for the deaths. It's a weird, confusing legal split that leaves many people asking what actually happened.
📖 Related: George Clooney Looks Sick: What Most People Get Wrong
The Night Everything Changed in Brentwood
The scene at 875 South Bundy Drive was horrific. Honestly, the descriptions from the first responders are still tough to read. Nicole Brown Simpson, OJ’s ex-wife, was found near the gate of her condominium. She had been stabbed multiple times. The sheer brutality of the attack suggested something deeply personal. Nearby lay Ron Goldman, a waiter and aspiring model who had simply been stopping by to drop off a pair of glasses Nicole’s mother had left at a restaurant earlier that night.
He was in the wrong place at the wrong time. Total tragedy.
Investigators found a trail of blood, a bloody shoe print (size 12 Bruno Magli, a detail that became famous later), and a dark cashmere glove. When police went to OJ Simpson’s estate at Rockingham, they found another glove. It matched. That’s when the world stopped spinning and focused entirely on the Heisman Trophy winner.
Understanding the Legal Verdicts vs. Reality
If you ask a lawyer who did OJ Simpson kill, they’ll give you a nuanced answer about the burden of proof. In the 1995 criminal trial, the prosecution had to prove guilt "beyond a reasonable doubt." They failed. The defense team, led by Johnnie Cochran, successfully argued that the LAPD was riddled with racism and that the evidence could have been planted. Mark Fuhrman’s testimony was a disaster for the state.
But the civil trial in 1997 was a different beast.
In civil court, the standard is a "preponderance of evidence." Basically, is it more likely than not? The jury there said yes. They ordered Simpson to pay $33.5 million to the families of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman. So, in the eyes of the civil law, Simpson was responsible for the killings.
- The Glove: The most famous blunder. Simpson struggled to put on the bloody gloves in court. But experts later noted that leather shrinks when soaked in blood and then dried.
- The DNA: There was a "mountain of evidence," as the prosecutors called it. Blood from the scene matched OJ. Blood in his car matched the victims.
- The Bronco: That slow-speed chase was watched by 95 million people. Why run if you're innocent? That was the question everyone asked.
The Victims: Nicole and Ron
We focus so much on the celebrity that we forget the victims. Nicole Brown Simpson was a mother of two. She had documented years of domestic abuse during her relationship with OJ. Police had been called to their home multiple times. In one 1989 incident, OJ pleaded no contest to spousal abuse.
Ron Goldman was a guy just starting his life. He was a black belt in karate. He was a friend. He fought back—the evidence showed a struggle. He didn't have to be there, but he was doing a favor for a friend’s mom. That’s the part that really haunts people when they look back at the case.
Why the Case Still Matters in 2026
You might wonder why we're still talking about this. It's because the case was a perfect storm of race, celebrity, domestic violence, and police misconduct. It exposed the massive divide in how different communities viewed the legal system. When the "not guilty" verdict was read, cameras caught the world’s reaction: half the country was cheering, and the other half was in total shock.
It also pioneered the "24-hour news cycle." Without the OJ trial, we probably don't have the current landscape of true crime podcasts and wall-to-wall celebrity coverage. It was the first time a trial became a reality show.
Moving Beyond the Controversy
The facts of the case are archived in thousands of pages of court transcripts. While OJ Simpson maintained his innocence until his death in 2024, the civil judgment remains a permanent legal record of his liability. For the families of Ron and Nicole, the quest for "justice" has been a long, painful road involving book deals, auctions of OJ's memorabilia, and decades of public scrutiny.
If you want to understand the full scope of the evidence, the best step is to look at the primary sources rather than just the TV dramatizations.
✨ Don't miss: Jimmy Carter Today Picture: What Most People Get Wrong About His Final Chapter
Next Steps for Further Research:
- Review the Civil Trial Transcripts: This is where the most damning evidence regarding the Bruno Magli shoes was actually presented, which the criminal jury never saw.
- Read "If I Did It": The controversial book where Simpson describes a "hypothetical" version of the murders. The Goldman family eventually won the rights to this book to satisfy part of the civil judgment.
- Examine the LAPD Forensic Reports: Look into the specific DNA markers found at the Bundy scene and how they correlated with the samples taken from the Rockingham estate.
- Study the History of Domestic Violence Advocacy: Many experts point to this case as the turning point for how the legal system handles "red flags" in abusive relationships.
Understanding the tragedy of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman requires looking past the "Trial of the Century" headlines and focusing on the forensic and historical reality of what happened that night in June.