If you’ve spent any time on financial Twitter or watching the news lately, you've probably seen the headlines. There is a lot of talk about whether a President can just walk into the Eccles Building and tell the Fed Chair, "You're fired."
It sounds like a simple question. In reality? It's a legal minefield that has the entire U.S. economy holding its breath.
Honestly, the short answer is that the President of the United States is the only person with the potential power to do it, but they can’t just do it because they’re grumpy about interest rates. There are "golden handcuffs" on this power, and right now, in early 2026, those handcuffs are being tested like never before.
The "For Cause" Mystery: Why it’s not just a pink slip
The Federal Reserve Act of 1913 is the rulebook here. It says members of the Board of Governors—and the Chair is always a Governor—can be removed by the President "for cause." But here’s the kicker: the law doesn't actually define what "cause" means.
Legal scholars, like Peter Conti-Brown from the University of Pennsylvania, usually interpret this to mean things like:
📖 Related: TCPA Shadow Creek Ranch: What Homeowners and Marketers Keep Missing
- Inefficiency (Basically not doing the job)
- Neglect of duty (Sleeping at the wheel)
- Malfeasance in office (Actual crimes or corruption)
What it definitely doesn't mean is "I want lower interest rates and you won't give them to me." If a President fired the Chair over a policy dispute, it would likely be seen as a violation of the law.
The 2026 Legal Showdown: Trump v. Cook
We aren't just talking in hypotheticals anymore. As of January 2026, the Supreme Court is literally hearing arguments in a case called Trump v. Cook. This case involves President Trump's attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook back in August 2025.
The administration’s argument is basically that the President should have the power to fire anyone in the executive branch at will. They’re leaning on something called the "Unitary Executive Theory." On the other side, the Fed and its supporters point to a 1935 case called Humphrey’s Executor. In that one, the Supreme Court told FDR he couldn't fire a commissioner at the FTC just because they had different political vibes.
"The independence of the Federal Reserve is really at stake," says Harvard Law Professor Daniel Tarullo.
👉 See also: Starting Pay for Target: What Most People Get Wrong
If the Court rules that the President can fire a Governor like Cook without a massive legal reason, the Chair’s job becomes a lot less secure.
Can the Chair stay even if they are "fired"?
This is where it gets weirdly technical. Jerome Powell’s term as Chair ends in May 2026. However, his term as a Governor doesn't end until 2028.
If the President "demotes" the Chair, they might still technically stay on the Board as a regular Governor. Also, the Fed Chair is also the head of the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC). That group actually elects its own leader.
So, theoretically, the President could fire someone as "Chair of the Board," but the FOMC could turn around and say, "Well, we still want them to lead our committee." It would be a total constitutional crisis.
✨ Don't miss: Why the Old Spice Deodorant Advert Still Wins Over a Decade Later
The Nuclear Option: Pretext and Investigations
Lately, we’ve seen a shift in strategy. Instead of saying "I'm firing you for high rates," the current administration has opened a Justice Department probe into Powell over $2.5 billion in building renovations.
Powell calls this a "pretext." That’s a fancy legal word for a fake reason used to cover up the real reason.
If the government can prove actual "malfeasance" (like financial mismanagement), they have a much stronger legal case for a "for cause" firing. But if it looks like they're just digging for dirt to get their way on interest rates, the courts might step in and block the move.
What happens if the Chair actually gets fired?
- Market Chaos: Wall Street hates uncertainty. A firing would likely cause stocks to tank and bond yields to spike.
- Legal Injunctions: The Chair would almost certainly sue immediately. A lower court might issue a stay, meaning the Chair stays in their office while the lawyers fight it out for months.
- Congressional Backlash: Even within the President's own party, there’s usually a lot of pushback. For instance, Senator Thom Tillis has already signaled he’s wary of these moves.
Your Actionable Insights
If you’re watching this play out and wondering how it affects your wallet, here’s how to handle the noise:
- Watch the Supreme Court: The ruling in Trump v. Cook (expected by June 2026) will be the "Big Bang" moment for Fed independence. If the Fed loses, expect more political volatility in interest rate decisions.
- Ignore the "He Said, She Said": Presidents often complain about the Fed to shift blame for inflation. It's a tale as old as time. Don't make investment decisions based on a stray tweet or a "preliminary investigation" unless a formal removal notice is actually filed.
- Monitor the May 2026 Deadline: Since Powell's term as Chair ends naturally in May, the most likely scenario is that the administration simply waits him out and appoints someone more "aligned" with their views, like Kevin Warsh or Kevin Hassett.
The Federal Reserve was built to be a "lonely" institution, insulated from the heat of elections. Whether it stays that way depends on how those three words—"removed for cause"—are interpreted by the nine people in black robes across the street.