When the final tally flashed on the Senate floor on February 20, 2025, the room felt heavy. You could hear a pin drop. Kash Patel, the man who once suggested turning the FBI headquarters into a "museum of the deep state," was officially the new Director.
The vote was 51-49.
It was a nail-biter. While most of the GOP held the line for Donald Trump’s pick, a couple of familiar faces decided to jump ship. People often ask which Republicans voted against Patel because, in such a tight race, every single "no" vote from the majority party felt like a thunderclap.
The Republican Holdouts: Who Actually Said No?
Honestly, if you've followed Senate politics for more than five minutes, the names won't shock you. But the reasons they gave? Those are what actually matter for the future of the Bureau.
Senator Susan Collins of Maine and Senator Lisa Murkowski of Alaska were the only two Republicans to vote against Kash Patel.
💡 You might also like: Percentage of Women That Voted for Trump: What Really Happened
They didn't just quietly whisper their opposition, either. They went on the record with some pretty pointed concerns about what Patel’s leadership might do to the country’s premier law enforcement agency. Collins, specifically, pointed to Patel's "aggressive political activity." She worried out loud that his history made it impossible for him to be the apolitical leader the FBI needs.
Murkowski was on the same page. She basically said the FBI should be about rooting out crime, not settling political scores. To her, Patel’s past—including his vocal criticism of the very agency he now leads—was a red flag that couldn't be ignored.
Why the GOP Defections Didn't Stop the Confirmation
You might be wondering: "If two Republicans voted no, how did he still get 51 votes?"
Mathematics in the Senate is weird. Because the Republicans held a 53-47 majority following the 2024 elections, they had a tiny bit of wiggle room. Even with Collins and Murkowski voting "no" alongside every single Democrat and Independent, the GOP still reached 51.
📖 Related: What Category Was Harvey? The Surprising Truth Behind the Number
The real story, though, was Mitch McConnell.
The outgoing GOP leader had been a thorn in Trump's side for weeks, voting against other "controversial" picks like Robert F. Kennedy Jr. and Pete Hegseth. Everyone expected him to be the third "no" vote on Patel. Instead, McConnell flipped. He voted "yes," giving Patel the cushion he needed to cross the finish line.
What Most People Get Wrong About the Patel Vote
A lot of folks think this was just about "loyalty" or "MAGA" vs. "Establishment." That’s part of it, sure, but the drama in the Judiciary Committee before the floor vote was much messier.
- The "Retribution" List: Democrats like Dick Durbin were freaking out over Patel’s book, Government Gangsters, which supposedly listed 60 "deep state" actors.
- Whistleblower Claims: During the hearings, rumors swirled that Patel—as a private citizen—was already helping "purge" FBI officials before he was even confirmed.
- The Experience Gap: Critics argued Patel didn't have the law enforcement resume typically required for a 10-year term. Supporters countered that his time as a public defender and prosecutor was plenty.
The Actionable Reality of the Patel Era
So, Patel is in. What does that actually change for you? If you’re tracking this because you care about how the law is applied in the U.S., here is the reality of what happens next:
👉 See also: When Does Joe Biden's Term End: What Actually Happened
1. Watch the 10-Year Term
Unlike Cabinet secretaries, FBI Directors are appointed for a decade to keep them away from politics. However, as we saw with James Comey and Chris Wray, a President can still fire them. Patel’s tenure is theoretically long-term, but his survival depends on maintaining that slim GOP support.
2. The Reorganization is Real
Don't expect the FBI to look the same in six months. With Patel at the helm, there’s a high probability of "decentralization." This means moving power out of the D.C. headquarters and into field offices across the country.
3. Oversight is Going to be Intense
Because the vote was so narrow, expect the Senate Judiciary Committee to keep Patel on a very short leash. Collins and Murkowski will likely be watching his every move, ready to join Democrats in calling for hearings if the Bureau starts looking too "political."
If you want to stay ahead of the curve, keep an eye on the internal memos coming out of the J. Edgar Hoover Building over the next few weeks. The "purge" people feared is either going to happen immediately or be tempered by the reality of leading 35,000 employees who are mostly career professionals.
Check the official Senate roll call records for the 119th Congress if you want to see the specific breakdown of every procedural vote leading up to this. Understanding the "cloture" votes—the ones that allow the final vote to happen—is often more telling than the final "yes" or "no."