You've probably seen the ink. A massive cross on a forearm. A delicate Hebrew script winding around a wrist. Or maybe a full back piece of the Last Supper. It’s everywhere. Yet, for anyone who grew up in a traditional church or had a grandmother with a sharp eye for "un-Christian" behavior, there’s always that nagging question. Honestly, where does it say in the bible about tattoos exactly?
Most people point to one specific verse like it’s a "gotcha" moment. Leviticus 19:28. That’s the heavy hitter. But if you think that’s the end of the story, you’re missing about 90% of the context. The Bible isn't a modern rulebook; it's an ancient library. Understanding what it says about body art requires looking at Bronze Age rituals, Roman punishment, and how the early church decided which old rules still mattered.
The Famous Prohibition: Leviticus 19:28
Let’s get the elephant in the room out of the way immediately. If you open a standard Bible to the Old Testament, specifically the book of Leviticus, you’ll find the primary answer to where does it say in the bible about tattoos.
The verse reads: "You shall not make any cuttings in your flesh for the dead, nor tattoo any marks on you: I am the Lord."
Seems pretty cut and dry, right? Not really.
To understand why this was written, you have to look at who the Israelites were living next to. They were surrounded by Canaanites, Egyptians, and various pagan tribes. For many of these cultures, cutting the skin or marking the body wasn't just about "style." It was a mourning ritual. It was a way to appease the dead or show devotion to a specific deity like Baal.
Biblical scholar Dr. John Walton often points out that these laws were about "sanctity" and "separation." God was essentially telling the Israelites, "Don't look like everyone else because you aren't like everyone else." He didn't want them participating in rituals that implied the dead still had power over the living. It was about identity.
The Weird Language of the Original Text
The Hebrew word used here is kethobeth. It’s a bit of a linguistic mystery because it only appears once in the entire Bible. Some scholars argue it refers specifically to "incised marks" or "branding."
In the ancient world, branding was for slaves. It was a mark of ownership. By telling the Israelites not to do this, there’s an argument to be made that God was protecting their dignity as free people. They weren't slaves to a human master, and they weren't supposed to use the ritualistic marks of the surrounding pagan religions.
💡 You might also like: Virgo Love Horoscope for Today and Tomorrow: Why You Need to Stop Fixing People
Context Matters: The Rest of the Chapter
If we’re going to be honest about Leviticus 19:28, we have to look at the verses surrounding it. This is where things get sticky for the "no tattoos" crowd.
Just a few verses away, the Bible says you shouldn't trim the edges of your beard (19:27). It says you shouldn't wear clothing made of two different types of fabric (19:19). It also says you shouldn't eat meat with the blood still in it (19:26).
Most modern Christians have no problem wearing a poly-cotton blend shirt or grabbing a medium-rare steak at LongHorn Steakhouse. They definitely don't think a trip to the barber for a beard trim is a sin. So, why do we isolate the tattoo verse?
This leads to the massive theological debate between the "Moral Law" and the "Ceremonial Law." Many theologians, including those from the Reformed tradition, argue that the ceremonial laws of the Old Testament were fulfilled by Jesus and are no longer binding. If the tattoo ban was a ceremonial law meant to keep Israel culturally distinct from Canaan, many argue it no longer applies to believers today.
Is There Anything Pro-Tattoo in the Bible?
Believe it or not, there are some passages that people use to argue the opposite. They aren't "tattoos" in the way we think of them—electric needles and ink—but they are mentions of marks on the body that seem positive.
Take Isaiah 44:5, for example. It describes a time of blessing where people will say "I am the Lord’s" and "another will write on his hand, 'The Lord's.'"
Writing on the hand? That sounds a lot like a permanent mark of devotion.
Then there’s the Book of Revelation. In Revelation 19:16, describing the return of Jesus, it says: "On his robe and on his thigh he has a name written, King of Kings and Lord of Lords."
📖 Related: Lo que nadie te dice sobre la moda verano 2025 mujer y por qué tu armario va a cambiar por completo
Some take this literally. They imagine Jesus with a tattoo on His leg. Others, like Dr. Michael Heiser, would argue this is symbolic imagery of authority and kingship, not a literal trip to a tattoo parlor in the celestial realms. Regardless, it’s a stark contrast to the idea that marks on the skin are inherently evil or "satanic."
The New Testament Silence
If you’re looking for where does it say in the bible about tattoos in the New Testament, you’re going to be looking for a long time. It simply isn't there. Jesus never mentions it. Paul never mentions it. Peter doesn't care.
The early church was much more concerned with things like whether or not you could eat food sacrificed to idols or if Gentile converts needed to be circumcised. If tattooing was a major moral failing, you’d expect the apostles to bring it up, especially as they moved into Greek and Roman territories where body marking was common.
Instead, the New Testament shifts the focus from the external to the internal.
- "Man looks at the outward appearance, but the Lord looks at the heart." (1 Samuel 16:7 - okay, that's Old Testament, but it's the vibe).
- "Your beauty should not come from outward adornment... instead, it should be that of your inner self." (1 Peter 3:3-4).
The primary New Testament argument against tattoos usually revolves around the "Temple of the Holy Spirit" concept from 1 Corinthians 6:19. The logic goes like this: your body is a temple, so you shouldn't "vandalize" it with ink.
However, if you actually read 1 Corinthians 6, Paul isn't talking about art. He’s talking about sexual immorality. Using that verse to ban tattoos is a bit of a stretch, though it does raise a valid point about stewardship and how we treat our physical selves.
Cultural Shifts and Modern Perspectives
For centuries, the Western world associated tattoos with sailors, criminals, or "heathens." This was largely due to the influence of the Latin Vulgate and early Catholic interpretations of Leviticus.
But culture changes.
👉 See also: Free Women Looking for Older Men: What Most People Get Wrong About Age-Gap Dating
Today, tattoos are a primary form of storytelling. For a Christian, a tattoo might be a "Ebenezer"—a stone of help, a physical reminder of a time God got them through a crisis. It becomes a conversation starter for their faith.
Is it possible that a tattoo could be a sin? Sure. If someone gets a tattoo of something hateful, or if they’re doing it as an act of rebellion against their parents, or if they’re spending money on ink while their children go hungry. But in those cases, the sin isn't the ink. It’s the heart behind it.
Why People Are Still Confused
The confusion exists because we want black-and-white rules. We want a list of "do's and don'ts." The Bible, especially the New Testament, tends to give us principles instead.
- Conscience: Romans 14 talks about not violating your own conscience. If you feel like getting a tattoo is wrong, then for you, it is wrong.
- Stumbling Blocks: If getting a tattoo is going to cause a massive division in your family or church, is it worth it?
- Motivation: Why are you doing it? Is it to glorify yourself, or is it a meaningful expression of your journey?
Historical Nuance: The Coptic Christians
If you want a fascinating real-world example, look at the Coptic Christians in Egypt. They have a tradition dating back centuries of tattooing a small cross on the inside of their right wrist.
Why? Because in a region where they have faced intense persecution, that tattoo is a permanent declaration of their faith. They can’t hide it. They can't deny Jesus when their skin literally says who they belong to. In this context, the tattoo is an act of extreme courage and devotion. It’s hard to look at a Coptic cross tattoo and say, "That’s a sin because of a verse in Leviticus about pagan mourning rituals."
Practical Takeaways for the Undecided
If you’re staring at a tattoo shop window and wondering if you should walk in, don't just look for a single verse. Think about the whole picture.
- Check the "Why": If you’re getting a tattoo to be "edgy" or to spite someone, wait. That’s not a great foundation for a permanent decision.
- Research the Symbols: Make sure the art doesn't have hidden meanings you don't actually support. Some ancient symbols look cool but carry heavy baggage.
- Consider the "Temple" Principle: Stewardship is real. Think about the quality of the work, the health risks (which are low in modern shops, but still), and the long-term impact on your professional life depending on your field.
- The "Grandma Test": You don't necessarily need her permission, but if you can't explain the meaning of your tattoo to someone you respect without feeling ashamed, you might not be ready for it.
The Bible doesn't give a "yes" or "no" to modern tattooing. It warns against pagan rituals and ownership marks in a very specific ancient context. Beyond that, it asks us to use wisdom, honor our bodies, and focus more on the state of our souls than the pigment in our skin.
If you're moving forward with ink, focus on art that reflects your values or tells a story of personal growth. Make it something that honors the "temple" rather than just cluttering it. Ultimately, the question isn't just "is it allowed?" but "is it helpful?" Use that lens, and you'll find the answer much more easily than by hunting for a single line of text in an ancient law code.