It’s the question that sticks in your head after the credits roll or you flip that final, frantic page. You’ve spent hours inside Rachel Watson’s alcohol-fogged brain, trying to piece together a murder that she might have witnessed—or maybe even committed. But the climax is visceral. It’s messy. When the confrontation finally happens at the end of Paula Hawkins' The Girl on the Train, the violence is specific. Where did the girl on the train get stabbed? If you’re looking for the exact physical location and the narrative geography of that moment, the answer is as brutal as the book's themes: Megan Hipwell, and later her killer, are stabbed in the neck with a corkscrew in the underbourne near the railway tracks.
Wait, let's back up.
To understand why that specific injury matters, you have to look at how the story builds toward it. We aren't just talking about a random act of violence. This is about the "underbourne"—that scrubby, neglected patch of land behind the Victorian terrace houses in Witney. It’s where the private lives of the characters bleed into the public view of the commuters passing by on the 8:04 train to London Euston.
The Scene of the Crime: The Underbourne
The physical "where" is just as important as the anatomical "where." In both the 2015 novel and the 2016 film adaptation starring Emily Blunt, the climax takes place in the woods or the overgrown garden area behind the houses on Blenheim Road (or the Hudson Line in the movie's New York setting).
Megan Hipwell isn't just some victim in a vacuum. She’s "Jess" to Rachel. She's a symbol of a perfect life that turns out to be a hollowed-out wreck. When we finally learn the truth about what happened to her, it happens in a shallow grave. Tom Watson, the smooth-talking, gaslighting villain of the piece, kills her because she’s pregnant and refuses to be quiet about it. He strikes her with a heavy object—a stone—killing her in the woods.
But the "stabbing" people usually remember, the one that provides the catharsis, happens much later. It's the confrontation between Rachel, Anna (the new wife), and Tom.
The Corkscrew: Why the Neck?
Honestly, the choice of weapon is poetic. It’s a corkscrew. It’s a tool associated with Rachel’s alcoholism, the very thing that made her an unreliable witness and a social pariah. In the final showdown, Tom is the one who ends up on the receiving end.
Rachel stabs Tom in the neck. Specifically, she plunges the corkscrew into his throat.
It’s a grisly, desperate move. She doesn't just poke him; she twists it. This isn't a clean, cinematic death. It’s a struggle in the dirt. Anna, the woman who spent the whole book hating Rachel, actually helps finish the job. She doesn't call the police immediately. She watches. She even helps twist the tool further into Tom's neck to ensure he's dead.
This moment is the pivot point for the entire story. It’s where the "weak" women—the drunk and the housewife—reclaim their agency from the man who played them against each other.
Book vs. Movie: Small Shifts in the Violence
If you’re watching the movie and wondering why things look a bit different than the text you read, you aren't crazy.
In the novel, the setting is the outskirts of London. The atmosphere is grey, damp, and quintessentially British. The "underbourne" is a specific term for that wasteland between the tracks and the fences. In the film, the action is moved to Westchester, New York. The lush, green suburban sprawl of the Hudson Valley replaces the grimy London commute.
However, the stabbing remains consistent. The neck is the target.
📖 Related: St. Vincent: Why Melissa McCarthy In This Role Still Matters
Why the neck? From a narrative standpoint, it’s about silencing the liar. Tom’s power came from his voice—his ability to lie to Rachel, to lie to Anna, and to manipulate Megan. By stabbing him in the throat, Rachel literally cuts off his ability to deceive. It’s a visceral end to a story built on verbal abuse and psychological warfare.
Dealing with the "Unreliable Narrator" Confusion
A lot of the confusion regarding where did the girl on the train get stabbed stems from Rachel’s blackouts. For the first two-thirds of the story, Rachel (and the reader) isn't sure if she saw a stabbing, a hit, or a simple argument.
- The Blackout: Rachel gets off the train at Witney on the night Megan disappears.
- The Blur: She remembers blood. She remembers a tunnel.
- The Reality: She didn't see Megan get stabbed. She saw Tom. She was actually the one being attacked by Tom in the underpass.
Because the narrative jumps between Megan’s past and Rachel’s present, readers often conflate the two events. Megan was bludgeoned. Tom was stabbed. The locations are nearly identical—the edge of the property line near the tracks—which adds to the disorientation.
The Anatomical Reality of the Scene
Let’s get technical for a second. Stabbing someone in the neck with a corkscrew isn't like a knife wound. A corkscrew is designed to grip and pull. When Rachel uses it, it’s a blunt-force puncture. In a medical sense, this would likely hit the carotid artery or the jugular vein, leading to rapid exsanguination (bleeding out).
Hawkins writes the scene with a cold, almost clinical detachment that makes it feel more real. There’s no "action hero" vibe here. It’s just two terrified women and a dying man in a backyard.
Why This Specific Question Persists
People keep searching for "where did the girl on the train get stabbed" because the book is a masterclass in shifting perspectives. You’re constantly questioning what’s real.
Even when you finish, the trauma of the ending sticks. You want to verify the details because the book spent 300 pages making you doubt your own eyes. You're looking for a solid fact in a story made of shadows.
Actionable Insights for Readers and Writers
If you’re revisiting The Girl on the Train or writing your own psychological thriller, there are a few things you can take away from how this stabbing was handled:
- Weapon Choice Matters: Using a corkscrew wasn't random. It was a callback to Rachel's addiction. Always link your "how" to your character's "who."
- Geography is Destiny: The proximity to the train tracks represents the thin line between a normal life and a total wreck. The setting should always mirror the internal state of the characters.
- The Payoff Must Be Earned: The reason the neck stabbing feels so "right" to the audience is that Tom's lies were his primary weapon. The punishment fit the crime.
When you look at the evidence, the answer is clear. The "girl on the train" (Rachel) wasn't the one who got stabbed—she was the one holding the tool. The victim of the stabbing was the antagonist, Tom Watson, and the location was the vulnerable soft tissue of his neck, right there in the dirt by the tracks where it all began.
To fully grasp the impact of the scene, re-read the final chapter focusing specifically on Anna’s perspective. It changes the way you view the "justice" served in the underbourne. Pay close attention to the description of the "hole" in his neck; it's a grim reminder that in this story, nobody truly gets away clean. Look for the nuance in how the police eventually treat the site—it's ruled as self-defense, but the ambiguity of the "two women in the garden" remains the most chilling part of the story's end.