History isn't usually a clean line. If you ask a historian when was the First Crusade, they won’t just give you a single afternoon in July. They’ll give you a messy four-year window that basically reshaped the Mediterranean forever.
It started with a speech. It ended with a massacre. In between, thousands of people—some knights, some peasants, some literal children—walked across a continent because a Pope told them it was God’s will.
Honestly, the timeline is wild. You’ve got the official "Princes' Crusade" starting in 1096, but there was this whole chaotic "People's Crusade" that jumped the gun months earlier. If you’re looking for the exact moment the fuse was lit, you have to look at November 27, 1095. That’s when Pope Urban II stood up at the Council of Clermont and told the Frankish nobility that they needed to stop fighting each other and go "liberate" Jerusalem instead.
People think the Crusades were just about religion. It’s never that simple. Europe was crowded, violent, and hungry. The Byzantine Emperor, Alexios I Komnenos, was freaking out because the Seljuk Turks were knocking on the doors of Constantinople. He sent a letter asking for help. He probably expected a few hundred elite mercenaries. Instead, he got a tidal wave of Europeans who didn't plan on leaving.
The 1095 Spark: Why Urban II Spoke Up
Why then? Why 1095?
The Byzantine Empire was shrinking. Fast. After the Battle of Manzikert in 1071, the Seljuks had basically taken over Anatolia (modern-day Turkey). By the time we get to the mid-1090s, the situation was desperate.
Urban II saw an opportunity. He wasn't just being a "good Christian neighbor." He wanted to heal the Great Schism of 1054—the massive breakup between the Catholic and Orthodox churches. By helping the East, he hoped to flex some serious papal muscle and bring everyone back under Rome’s thumb.
When he spoke at Clermont, he didn't just offer a "thank you" for fighting. He offered an Indulgence. Basically, a "Get Out of Purgatory Free" card. If you died on the way to Jerusalem, your sins were wiped clean. To a medieval person who spent every waking hour terrified of hellfire, that was the ultimate incentive.
The People’s Crusade: The 1096 Disaster
Before the "real" soldiers were even packed, a guy named Peter the Hermit started preaching to the masses. This is the part of the First Crusade timeline people usually gloss over because it was a total train wreck.
In the spring of 1096, thousands of peasants, petty criminals, and low-level knights headed east. They didn't have supplies. They didn't have a plan. They mostly just had zeal.
They also had a lot of misplaced rage. Before they even left Europe, some of these groups—most notably led by Count Emicho—turned on Jewish communities in the Rhineland. It was a horrific series of pogroms. They figured, "Why travel thousands of miles to fight 'infidels' when there are non-Christians right here?" It’s a dark, often ignored stain on the era's history.
👉 See also: How Did Maine Vote in 2024? What Most People Get Wrong
When Peter the Hermit’s mob finally reached Constantinople, Emperor Alexios was horrified. These weren't soldiers. They were a liability. He ferried them across the Bosporus as fast as he could. The Turks annihilated them almost immediately at the Battle of Civetot.
The Real Deal: 1096 to 1097
While the peasants were getting slaughtered, the heavy hitters were finally mobilizing. We’re talking about names like Godfrey of Bouillon, Bohemond of Taranto, and Raymond IV of Toulouse.
They didn't travel as one giant army. That would have been impossible to feed. They took different routes through Europe and met up at Constantinople in late 1096 and early 1097.
By June 1097, they took Nicaea. Then came the Battle of Dorylaeum. This was the first time the Western knights really felt what it was like to fight the Turkish horse archers. It was a brutal wake-up call. The knights only won because they managed to hold a defensive line until a second wing of the army arrived to flank the Turks.
It was a miracle they survived. Seriously.
The Siege of Antioch: The Turning Point (1097–1098)
If you want to know when was the First Crusade at its most desperate, it was the winter of 1097 outside the walls of Antioch.
The siege lasted eight months. The Crusaders were starving. They were eating their horses. Some reports say they were eating leather. Desertion was rampant. Even Peter the Hermit tried to run away.
They eventually got in through a bribe—a traitor inside the city opened a window—but as soon as they entered, a massive Turkish relief army led by Kerbogha arrived and trapped them inside.
Now the Crusaders were the ones being besieged.
Then came the "Holy Lance." A guy named Peter Bartholomew claimed he had a vision of where the spear that pierced Jesus’ side was buried. They dug under a church and found a piece of iron. Whether it was real or a plant doesn't matter; it worked. The demoralized, starving army was so hyped up by this "sign from God" that they marched out and actually defeated Kerbogha’s superior force.
The Fall of Jerusalem: July 1099
After Antioch, the army spent a lot of time arguing about who got to keep the city. Bohemond won that fight, much to Raymond’s annoyance.
The remaining forces finally trudged south. By the time they reached Jerusalem in June 1099, the "Great Army" was a shadow of its former self. Out of the roughly 60,000 who started, maybe 12,000 were left.
They were thirsty. The Fatimid Caliphate, which held the city, had poisoned the wells outside the walls.
They needed wood for siege towers. Luckily, a couple of Genoese ships arrived at the port of Jaffa and dismantled their own timber to help. On July 15, 1099, the towers reached the walls. Godfrey of Bouillon was among the first over.
What followed was a bloodbath.
Contemporary accounts—both Christian and Muslim—describe the streets running "ankle-deep in blood." They killed everyone. Muslims, Jews, and even some local Christians who got caught in the crossfire. By the evening of July 15, the First Crusade had technically achieved its goal. Jerusalem was theirs.
Was it Actually "Successful"?
Depends on who you ask.
In the short term? Yes. They established the Crusader States: the Kingdom of Jerusalem, the County of Edessa, the Principality of Antioch, and the County of Tripoli. For about 200 years, Western Europeans held a slice of the Middle East.
In the long term? It was a disaster for diplomacy. It permanently scarred the relationship between the Catholic West and the Orthodox East. It created a legacy of holy war that the Islamic world would eventually use to unify under leaders like Saladin.
👉 See also: Giorgia Meloni: What Most People Get Wrong About Italy's Leader in 2026
Also, it was expensive. Most knights who went on the First Crusade came home broke—if they came home at all. They didn't go for the gold. Most went because they genuinely believed their souls were at stake.
Misconceptions You Should Probably Forget
There’s this idea that the Crusaders were sophisticated colonizers. They weren't. Most were younger sons with no inheritance back home, or deeply religious zealots who didn't even understand the geography of where they were going.
Another big one: the "Saracens" were a monolith. Not even close. The Seljuk Turks (Sunni) and the Fatimid Egyptians (Shia) hated each other. If the Muslim world had been united in 1096, the First Crusade wouldn't have made it past Nicaea. The Crusaders got lucky because they arrived during a massive power vacuum.
Timeline Summary
- 1095: Pope Urban II gives the speech at Clermont.
- Early 1096: The People’s Crusade leaves and is destroyed.
- Late 1096: The main Knightly armies depart.
- 1097: The Siege of Nicaea and the Battle of Dorylaeum.
- 1098: The fall of Antioch and the "finding" of the Holy Lance.
- 1099: The Siege and Fall of Jerusalem.
What to Do With This Information
If you’re a history buff or just curious about how we got to the modern geopolitical mess in the Levant, you need to read the primary sources.
Don't just take a textbook’s word for it. Look at the Gesta Francorum, which was written by someone who was actually in the army. Then, read the perspective of Ibn al-Qalanisi, a contemporary historian in Damascus.
Seeing how two different sides describe the same "miracle" or "massacre" is the only way to actually understand history.
Next Steps for Deep Diving:
✨ Don't miss: Finding Boston Globe Death Notices: How to Navigate Obits and Legals Like a Pro
- Map the Route: Open Google Earth and trace the path from Clermont to Jerusalem. Seeing the Anatolian mountains helps you realize why so many died of exhaustion.
- Check Local Museums: Many European and Middle Eastern museums have artifacts from this period, particularly coins minted in the Crusader States which show a fascinating blend of Western and Eastern styles.
- Read "The Crusades Through Arab Eyes" by Amin Maalouf: It’s a classic for a reason. It flips the script and provides the context that Western education often misses.
- Listen to Thomas Asbridge: He’s one of the leading modern experts on the Crusades. His documentaries and books strip away the romanticism and focus on the grueling reality of 11th-century warfare.
History isn't a static thing in a book. It’s a series of choices made by people who were just as confused and driven as we are today. Knowing when was the First Crusade is just the entry point. Understanding why they stayed is the real story.